Archive for the ‘9/11’ Category

Unqualified 9/11 Opinions

Sunday, April 8th, 2007

When you converse with an individual about a topic of which you have little knowledge, understanding or experience, you don’t chime in with opinions that contradict the information provided to you by the expert. For example if you ask someone for help with a computer because you can’t seem to access the Internet you are not going to stand there and blurt out your theories on why the problem is occurring, especially if you really don’t know much about computers. You are not going to say that you have bad cell phone reception in your home and that may provide a clue as to what the real problem is. You are not going to force him or her to take a look at your cell phone because it may help them solve your Internet problem. You’ll look like an idiot!Take 9/11 for example. I have been researching the events of 9/11 for about five years. I spend tens of hours per week keeping up on as much 9/11 related news and information as I can. I run TvNewsLIES.org full time. I don’t have a day job. (That’s why I need your support!!!) So I would pretty much say that I know a lot more about a lot of issues than the average investment banker, who may work 70 hours per week in the field of investment banking.

So why is it when I meet someone who has a full time job in a vocation that is completely unrelated to 9/11 they feel that their opinions about this issue are as valid as mine? I read a little bit about many subjects but I don’t go around correcting the conclusions and findings of various specialists. Even though I have owned and played guitar for almost thirty years I don’t tell my friend Jeff that my guitars are the best ever made because he owns a music shop (http://ampandguitar.com) and has been repairing musical instruments for 40 years. He knows better. Even though I have been a software engineer and systems developer I don’t tell my friend Fred, who is one of the best computer programmers I have ever know, how to construct an application. He knows better. I just wonder why programmers, and guitar shop owners and every Joe in the street thinks that they can jump in to a discussion about an issue like 9/11 and feel as if they are equally qualified to draw conclusions as people who have been researching the issue for years. They shouldn’t because we know better.

I know a lot about computers. When I help novices and even experts with their computers they usually sit quietly as I troubleshoot their systems. Sometimes they ask me questions and sometimes they just listen to my unsolicited explanation. Even if they are computer savvy they deffer to me on the computer issues that I know more about. I just wonder why the same people don’t show the same reasonable respect for persons with a higher level of experience when it comes to issues like 9/11, government conspiracies and media deception.

9/11 researchers, no matter how involved they are in the truth movement, need to do several things. They need to ease up on the theories, go long on the evidence and stop arguing with unqualified participants.

I had a funny friend who used to joke around by starting many discussions with the obnoxious line: “let’s start with what you DON’T know!” Maybe we 9/11 researchers should adapt that as our catch phrase! Think about it!

9/11 Truth Movement: Only Growing Stronger - And the Media are Frightened to Death!

Friday, April 6th, 2007

The corporate media have launched a desperate attempt to eliminate all discussions about the official body of evidence related to the events of 9/11. Just watch how they are trying frantically to get Rosie O’Donnell fired from ABC’s The View. Also think back to when the media launched a broad based attack against the character of Charlie Sheen for daring to publicly question the official story of 9/11. Rosie, however, is a much greater problem for the criminals in the media. She is on a daily network TV program with a large audience that doesn’t even know that questions and disturbing facts about 9/11 exist.

Let’s understand one thing: the 9/11 truth movement is doing nothing but growing. People who have been exposed to the actual evidence and understand the ramifications of what it reveals are not waking up one morning and suddenly deciding that they believe the official story. The dynamic works like this: those who are not aware of the evidence believe the official story. Once they start poking around they realize that the official story about the attacks could not possibly be true, and they discover the plethora of evidence that was hidden and misrepresented by the Bush administration, the 9/11 Commission and the corporate media. 9/11 truthers are not suddenly coming across new information that causes them to suddenly believe the official story. It’s a one way flow. The evidence speaks for itself.

Could that last statement possibly explain why the media are trying so desperately to quash any discussion about 9/11 or destroy the credibility of anyone who dares to try to raise the topic? You can bet that it is! But there is another angle here as well. The media are no longer trying to protect the insiders of the Bush administration whose involvement in the events and cover up of the evidence is implicated by so much that has been uncovered. This time around they are protecting themselves. Let’s be real here. With every day a liar continues to lie it becomes more difficult to undo, explain, correct or justify that lie. This is the position in which the corporate media find themselves right now.

The events of 9/11 pose a unique problem for the criminal corporate media. For generations, the media have kept Americans in the dark about topics like war, taxation, the monetary system, America’s involvement in atrocities in the world, domestic assassinations, science, health, and our environment. Yet, 9/11 is a topic that hits home like no other. Understand that this is not theory, this is provable.

We have to understand that the media have “protected the people” from the truth about many events over the years. I demonstrate this very clearly in a presentation that I give to live audiences. You can get some insight into media deception by perusing TvNewsLIES.org, but my lecture leaves no doubt in people’s minds that the media lie to them via distortions, distractions delusions and omissions. But even more important, they discover that the media are controlled by a single source. I don’t just tell people this, I show them the proof so they see it if for themselves. It’s right there, all the time and once you know what to look for you see it.

If anyone cares to call me out on this, all they have to do is invite me to give my presentation and provide an unrestricted question and answer session. Those who hear me will see the world in a different light; I promise you. That aside, my point here is that exposing the deceptions surrounding an issue such as the Federal Reserve to the American public would probably not provoke a huge amount of anger and outrage. I say that despite the fact that this topic involves perhaps the biggest conspiracy in the history of this country, and one that affects us all.

On the contrary, I can just imagine the horror and rage if the general public were to learn that the events of 9/11 had been actually carried out by rogue elements operating within our government, with outside cooperation (can you say Larry Silverstein?).The tragedy of 9/11 was personal. It was a vivid, calculated, murderous assault on Americans. Hindsight allows us to realize that 9/11 was the Bush administration’s first “shock and awe” campaign. It is easy to understand that. We all felt the pain and horror of that day, and many of us have lived ever since with 9/11 hanging over our heads and in our hearts, and we have seen those events eclipse our Constitution and democracy. Because of this, we have been easily emotionally manipulated and motivated ever since the attacks by the criminal corporate media. That is probably one of the most difficult realities to confront in all of this. Just think about the reactions of the newly awakened 9/11 truthers when they start to absorb the voluminous evidence that the criminal corporate media has hidden from them for all these years!

Have you ever seen the movie Cape Fear? In the film, Max Cady is a criminal who is released after a long prison term. While Cady was in prison he teaches himself law, using the prison library. While in prison Max discovers that his lawyer had been in possession of evidence that might have affected the outcome of the trial. However, the lawyer had not disclosed any of it to either Cady or the jury. He did not allow the jury to see evidence that might have led them to conclude that Cady did not commit the crime of which he was accused. For those of you who saw the movie, you know how angry Cady was when he got out of jail. And you also know that Cady’s vengeance is taken out on his lawyer, not on the jury that actually put him in jail.

Let me suggest that in the theoretical Case of 9/11, you, the American people, are very much like the members of the jury, just as and the criminal corporate media parallel the lawyer in the film. In a sense, as you will see a bit later, you also become one of the condemned defendants in the case of 9/11. In attempting to influence the jury as they try to determine what happened on 9/11, the criminal corporate media, like Cady’s lawyer, withheld evidence from you, the jury. Based on the cherry-picked evidence selected and presented to you, you were intentionally misled to draw prescribed conclusions related to the case. As a result, you easily found the defendant guilty. As a matter of fact the media in this case made sure that you pre-convicted the prescribed accused before they even presented any evidence to you.

But what you did not know when you reached your verdict was that you had not been allowed to see a massive amount of available evidence. The intent of the lawyer was to ensure a conviction, not to expose the truth. For example, in this predetermined trial, among so much more, you were never told about:

* A large organized group of highly placed people with known motives to commit the crime in question had far better opportunity to do so.

* Aspects of the crime that the accused could not possibly have carried out, such ordering NORAD not to follow procedures, preventing the US Secret Service from doing its job by immediately moving the president to a safe location once they knew the nation was under attack.

* Eyewitness testimony directly relating to the events of that day.

* Evidence of foreknowledge by people other than the accused.

* Scientific evidence that contradicts the official story by stating that pools of molten metal (much hotter than burning jet fuel ) burned below the collapsed building for weeks, by questioning how the buildings could have collapsed at faster than free fall speed, and by challenging the scientific accuracy of evaporating planes and impossible maneuvers by jet airliners.

And here is the more tragic irony. At the same time that you convicted a defendant on largely unsupported and highly unbelievable evidence, you actually sentenced YOURSELF as well. In this farce of a trial, you condemned yourself to an eternal post 9/11 nightmare world you could never have otherwise imagined!

You sentenced yourself to accepting the elimination of your own Constitutional rights. You sentenced yourself to supporting the use of your tax dollars for egregious and illegal assaults on other nations. You sentenced yourself to allowing the reduction of funding for vital domestic programs. In a nutshell, you sentenced yourself to supporting a foreign and domestic policy that has weakened almost every imaginable aspect of our nation.

All this has happened because evidence was withheld from you, making it impossible for you to seek the truth with any credible tools at your disposal. But, fortunately, that does not have to be the end of the story.

I submit to you that the Internet has served the American people in the same way that prison library served Max Cady. As we read and access legitimate public records on the Internet, we see more and more of the evidence that the lawyer (the criminal corporate media) withheld from us. And with each piece of evidence we find, we understandably become more and more angry with the lawyer.  in fact, the corrupt corporate media - who was supposed to work on our behalf!

As a result, the criminal corporate media have a lot to fear. They have to fear the response of the American people who may one day discover that they not only withheld evidence from the public, but duped the people of this country into supporting the actual criminals who committed atrocities against them on 9/11.

I learned this lesson before 9/11. I started TvNewsLIES.org while I still believed the official explanation of 9.11 but still had the US corporate media tagged as America’s #1 Enemy! I use 9/11 often in my writing because it is an issue that hits home with the American people. It is something they can understand. It is something that they experienced. The media have acted against the interest of the American people for generations, allowing a small group of powerful people to pretty much have their way with us and the planet in general..

Maybe 9/11 can serve as an eye opener and jolt the people into recognizing the US corporate media as the enemy. We don’t need media reform in this nation, we need media replacement. We need a real news industry, one that understands why its vocation is the only one protected by thy US Constitution. We don’t need a media with incestuous connections to the CIA or nefarious secret organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group). We don’t need journalists who report American Idol scandals; we need journalists to keep an eye on our government and show us every last piece of evidence they uncover about their misdeeds.

I often wonder what would happen if enough establishment institutions were to become really informed about 9/11. I have to believe that many Americans would probably accept the idea that 9/11 was an inside job and somehow justify it in their mind and heart. But I also wonder what would happen if a great many other people were like me and would not be OK with it. I often wonder how these people would react and who would be the target of their rage. But wondering aside, I know how I am reacting right now, and whom I want to punish. I am sure I am not alone when it comes to being angry with those who lie to protect the real criminals…and that’s why the media are becoming more and more terrified of any discussion about 9/11. Exposing the evidence can serve to wake up the millions of falsely imprisoned victims of their deception. And that can be fatal for the criminal corporate media.

The 9/11 truth movement can only grow. It’s not about theories. It’s not about accusations. It’s not about speculation. It’s about the official public body of evidence and how much of it has been kept from us, misrepresented and in some cases totally fabricated. You don’t have to convince people of a theory; all you have to do is show them the evidence. And the longer the criminal corporate media continue to withhold evidence, the harder it will be to explain to the growing body of very angry Max Cadys out there, why they have done so. Think about it.

To Bush the Hypocrite: There is no “Mission” to Accomplish in Iraq!

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2007

We are still being told, over and over, that US troops have to stay in Iraq until the ‘mission’ is accomplished. Nonsense!

Had the weapons inspections continued in Iraq, the originally stated ‘mission’ would have indeed been accomplished without a single life lost and George W. Bush would have been a respected global leader! But the mission was never about WMD and we all know it, but nobody is talking about it. No one ever publicly challenges this administration to clarify the ‘mission’ that has sent our soldiers into a self-sustaining meat grinder.

Reality check: the US launched an attack against a nation that had done nothing to provoke one. We were told that this war was needed to protect the American people from a real and growing threat based on Iraq’s WMD program and its cooperation with Al Qaeda. Both of those claims have been proven to be false and all indications, then and now, are that the Bush administration was intentionally lying about the threat posed by Iraq. No, they were not misled, nor did they ‘mislead’ the nation. They lied purposely and knowingly to terrorize a nation into accepting their war.

Bush and his cohorts were using their ‘imminent threat’ excuse to justify the planned agenda of the neoconservatives that had been prepared by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC.) So in, realty the stated mission was and is moot. There was nothing to protect us from and we all know that now.

Bottom line: THERE IS NO MISSION FOR OUR MILITARY IN IRAQ! Ergo, we cannot ‘complete’ the mission Mr. Bush talks about incessantly.

Now I ask the most obvious question…if George W. Bush is so willing to leave American troops in Iraq, where they are dying and killing people every day, and their presence there is increasing anti-American radicalism all over the world and leading to the financial death our nation, why was he not willing to leave the weapons inspectors there forever!

We could have left a non-stop inspection process in place indefinitely. It would have cost a fraction of what this invasion has cost us and it would have spared hundreds of thousands of lives. It would have sent a message to the entire world and it would have earned respect and admiration for America. George W. Bush’s popularity may have skyrocketed as a result, and the Republican party would have ruled supreme for a generation.

Instead, George W. Bush pushed the PNAC agenda. This was the real mission all along. This was why 9/11 happened Yes, I am saying that I believe 100 percent, based on the official body of evidence, that the events of 9/11/2001 were planned and conducted by elements within our government. This plan stemmed from from the determination of the PNAC neocon cabal to deliver the PNAC described New Pearl Harbor that they wrote about openly. Such a ‘cataclysmic event’ was a necessity for implementing their agenda which included regime change in Iraq, Iran and Syria!

Once again, the corporate media expose themselves as the enemy of the American people by continuing to report what has to be termed a “false reality.” They pretend that the mission in Iraq is legitimate. The ignore every single administrative hypocrisy; and there are more examples of this than one can be listed in a single day. And they continue to pretend that the obvious does not exist. In this case, the most obvious truth is still ignored by the networks - that the invasion of Iraq was based on a series of absolute lies. They still refuse to admit that inspectors were on the ground in Iraq, making the invasion completely unnecessary. For starters, do a search for the smoking gun known as the Downing Street Memos that the US media completely ignored)

The primary reason an invasion of Iraq became inevitable was that George W. Bush placed a time line on the inspections and he did this because WMD were never the issue. Regime change as per PNAC was. This should all be obvious to anybody who has even a minimally functioning brain ; if not then at least now! Think about it!

Would a White House Official Lie? Gee, I Wonder?

Thursday, March 22nd, 2007

While we have heard many a pundit describe the Bush administration insiders as Machiavelli types, we never hear the pundits describe what that means. I did a great deal of research on the people of the administration, their core neoconservative principles, their mentors and their histories. I also explained Machiavelli principles. Let me highlight one of those principles and then point you to my fully researched article; just for your reference:

Point: “A ruler can cheat and lie and do all sorts of things but should at all time maintain the outside appearance of adherence to human rights and caring for people.”

Please feel free to learn about the people who are currently occupy the White House:
Required Reading for Bush Supporters

Any Questions? Think about it!

Testifying Behind Closed Doors, Not Under Oath with No Notes or Recordings: Sound Familiar?

Wednesday, March 21st, 2007

As a human being, putting all politics aside, what is your gut reaction to an individual or group of individuals who only agree to take part in an investigation if their testimony is hidden from the public, not under oath and unrecorded in any way including by stenography? If you have human blood flowing to a human brain, and that brain has not been atrophied by extensive participation if freerepublic.com discussions, watching too much FOX News or listening to too much Sean Hannity, you probably feel that the person or people setting those conditions pretty much have something to hide. You would be correct.

As we watch the US Attorney firing scandal unfold and we watch the standoff between the Bush administration and Congress over who will testify and under what conditions they will do so, I want you to remember back to the 9/11 Commission hearings. You remember the 9/11 Commission, don’t you? They are the people who neglected to mention in their report that WTC7’s destruction took place on that day. They are also the guys who did not report about the multiple war games taking place in the northeast corridor that day. Anyway, my point is that I want you to recall the conditions set by George W. Bush for his participation in that most important investigation. Bush would only testify if his testimony was private, limited to one hour, not under oath, not recorded in any way shape or form, excluded all 9/11 Commission members except the co-chairman, and with Dick Cheney by his side.

So for those of you who draw the obvious conclusions about the real reason that Bush is setting these restrictive conditions for Rove and company during the attorney general scandal investigation, you may want to apply the same obvious conclusions to Bush’s behavior regarding the 9/11 investigation! Think about it!

Libby is No Scapegoat

Thursday, March 8th, 2007

While the media is playing up the fact that the Libby jury felt that Libby was a scapegoat for the real criminals in the CIA outing scandal, keep in mind Libby is a PNAC member. Libby was part of the cabal that wrote about invading Iraq before Bush was even in office. This is one of the guys who were part of the crew who wrote about how a “new Pearl Harbor” would help speed up their agenda. You know…a new Pearl Harbor…like 9/11!

Sure there were bigger fish and bigger criminals than Libby. I have said from the moment TvNewsLIES.org hit the web that Cheney was the ground zero of corruption in the Bush administration and with each day my claim becomes more valid. But Libby is not simply the fall guy here. He was part of a group that had been hell bent on going to war with Iraq and there was nothing that was going to interfere with their once in a lifetime opportunity to advance their agenda. Nothing.

Libby just a scapegoat, I think not!     Think about it!

Reference:

PNAC Gallery
Cheney - The Ground Zero of Corruption
Required Reading for Bush Supporters

9/11 in Perspective : Flight 93 and WTC7

Thursday, March 1st, 2007

I wrote about this several years ago and I was lambasted by the 9/11 truth community. Finally yesterday I noticed one person who made the same observation (Mike Rivero of Whatreallyhappened.com, a good friend of ours and not one of the people who criticized me.) Maybe now we can see the full picture of how the 9/11 events were supposed to unfold. Jesse Richard, Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

Disclaimer: The following is the opinion of the author. However this “opinion” is based on four years of research into the events of 9/11 and four years of full time investigative research into to how the US corporate media control information for the purpose of manipulating and maintaining a cult of false reality. If anyone among you doubts this claim, the author will gladly make his presentation to your group, radio or TV program, school, organization, etc. He will do this free of charge if travel accommodations are provided. He has an open challenge to every member of the media and will publicly debate anyone on this topic. It is not an issue of bias, it is an issue of deception and it is very easily exposed. You just have to be willing to take a few minutes to learn how to spot the deception!

It has become very clear to many 9/11 researchers that the events of 9/11/01 were planned and carried out by rogues within our own government under the cloak of war games that were being conducted on that very day. It is also clear that many things did not go as planned, and this is why there is so much suspicion related to the events. Perhaps, if the execution of the plan had been more perfect, fewer people would have been suspicious in the first place and much of the evidence noticed by the 9/11 researchers would have remained unnoticed.

One of the most obvious anomalies of 9/11 that attracted attention relates to the flawless, unexplained and virtually ignored collapse of WTC7, a 47 story building that was not hit by any airplane.

First some facts: WTC7 building collapsed in perfect controlled demolition form in less than seven seconds. This component of the events of 9/11 was not even mentioned in the bible of the blind known as the official 9/11 report. As a matter of fact, you can read the entire 9/11 Commission report and not even know that there was a WTC7, let alone that in collapsed under such suspicious circumstances. Another interesting little nugget relates to what appears to be a public confession by the owner of WTC7 acknowledging the intentional demolition of the building. Larry Silverstein seemed to openly admit to making the decision to “pull” the building. On public television, Silverstein was recorded describing the decision to “pull it,” a term used when a building is imploded via controlled demolition.

Now a new bombshell adds dramatic credibility to the suspicion surrounding the collapse of this now infamous building. The revelation comes in the form of newly publicized news footage from the BBC and CNN, clearly exposing the fact that the collapse was anticipated and that a detailed explanation of why this building could collapse was prepared for the press in advance, before anyone even knew why or if the building would fall.

Understand that these news organizations reported the building collapse almost half an hour before it actually did!

Some vital points: Many people will argue that WTC7 was damaged and burning quite badly, and that alone could cause the building to collapse. This is a reasonable assumption to some extent but it does not take many of the extenuating circumstances into account. Here are some things that have to be taken into account when assessing the reality of the situation: During the day we all heard radio and television reports telling us that the building was under great stress. We were told that the building was ‘œleaning’ and would not stay up for long. I suggest that we were being told this so there would be some reason to convince the public that this building would eventually collapse when, in fact, this was not true. Just think about this for a minute: if the building was indeed “leaning” then why didn’t it tip over? That’s what buildings do if they lean over badly enough.

It is not arguable that all objects on this planet are subject to the laws of physics as they currently exist. Physics 101 teaches that objects tip over do when they lean too far over. Why, then, did the core of the WTC7 building collapse first? Watch the video; that is what happened. The first thing that happens is that the penthouse structure drops into the building followed by what appears to be a completely simultaneous failure of every single supporting structure located on the same level of the lower portion of the building. Buildings do not collapse like this under any condition, and no acceptable explanation has ever been given as to how the building could lean and then collapse in the manner in which it did.

Let me repeat one fact that I can not emphasized enough: the warnings describing the building’s pending destruction described a building that appeared to be ready to fall because it was leaning. This would have meant that the building would eventually tip over totally or break at some point like a tree after a lumberjack gives it enough whacks with an axe. The building came straight down, center columns first, from the bottom, on to its own footprint. Repeat: Leaning = tipping over, and we were clearly told that the building was leaning.

Now let’s get on to the real question posed by those who refuse to accept the evidence, and who hold on to the belief that Americans would never do this, or who fall back on the old “why would the Bush administration, or other rogue elements within our government and military do this and leave so much suspicious evidence?”

The answer is simple, but difficult to accept: this was a hugely risky operation and could not have been completed without problems! And these problems have provided reasonable people with serious concerns about the real facts surrounding the tragic events of that day.

What is becoming clearer to me are the true intentions of the rogues within our government who conspired to shock and awe the American people into supporting a radical shift in American foreign and domestic policies. These criminals were intent on creating a scenario complete with a plausible reason for the collapse of WTC7. I believe that the planners of 9/11 originally wanted to counter the claims of potential conspiracy theory “wackos”  that WTC7 fell for the same reasons that caused the collapse of WCT1 and WTC2: because a plane hit it! I believe that WTC7 was the actual intended target of flight 93. I believe that flight 93 was, to the surprise of the rogues running the operation, shot down by some true American patriot who was performing his or her duty. I feel this person slipped by the efforts of the rogues who tried everything in their power to prevent the existing national defense procedures from operating successfully.

Had flight 93 actually hit WTC7, it would have served as an improbable but relatively reasonable explanation for the collapse of all three buildings. Science, witnesses, video and forensic evidence indicate that the main towers were brought down by controlled demolition and not as a result of any plane impact or raging fires. Still, the claim that the first two towers collapsed as a result of the damaging impact of aircrafts filled with jet fuel might serve as a reasonable explanation for what happened. On the other hand, the collapse of WTC7 - despite not having been hit by a plane - has caused people to reach for any explanation they could dream up and believe regardless of how implausible! These people look around frantically for scientific support for their unsupported theories, yet they ignore all of the other suspicious evidence surrounding the mystery of WTC7. They blind themselves to everything from comments by Silverstein himself to the dramatic video evidence and the revealing statements (and documentation) made by members of our government who were tasked with protecting us on that very day.

It is very important to pay close attention to the lack of public, official and media attention to WTC7. Most people do not know that there even was a WTC7. Most people don’t know the circumstances surrounding its collapse and have never seen a video of the collapse. Most people don’t know that this building has already been rebuilt! This may very well be because those involved did not want to draw attention to this building! Such publicity may have caused people to ask about a building so blatantly ignored on that fateful day. And, if they knew, they may have started poking around for answers to the obvious questions! You would also think that rebuilding the first WTC structure would have been a loud statement to the so called terrorists. You would think it would stand out as a symbol of American strength and resolve. And yet the reconstruction of this building went on and was completed with a virtual media blackout and to the surprise of anyone who eventually finds out about it.

It is equally vital to ask these questions: if construction of the new WTC7 was started in 2002 and completed in May of 2006, when was the replacement building originally planned? How long does it take to draw up the plans and actually build a 52 story building, especially in the footprint of damage done on 9/11? How long does it take to prepare for this kind of construction from the time you decide to build?

Let me repeat this as I scream as loud as I can: Construction for a 52 story building started less than one year after there was no reason to plan the project! How long does it take to come up with a design, arrange all the legalities, settle the insurance and arrange for the actual construction! Why wasn’t the rebuilding of this national historic symbol celebrated? Why didn’t FOX News taunt the terrorist with this as a sign of American resolve and as a sign that they did not beat us? Is it possible that this building plan had been initiated prior to the events of 9/11? Is this yet another smoking gun? I think it is!

A final point: The explanations given to the 9/11 research community by the people who like to debunk this evidence always follows the same pattern and always are hit and run piecemeal explanations. To my knowledge, nobody has ever debunked the entire body of evidence, that, along with the physical record include means, motive and opportunity as well as suspicious comments and actions. There is a big picture here and this issue must be discussed in a similar scope.

The body of evidence indicating the complicity of members of our own government in the events of 9/11 is growing daily. The ‘debunkers’ are starting to sound down right silly. Their apologist explanations are beginning to sound like typical “my dog ate my homework” excuses you might hear from a child. As a matter of fact, their responses to evidence are just that, excuses, not explanations. They often offer excuses that contradict the comments and admissions of the very people for whom they are providing these excuses!

One thing we must all admit at this time is that there are elements of the official 9/11 story that just do not add up; period, end of story. In that light, I ask the citizens of my country to stop fighting over speculation and start examining the big picture because the big picture may provide a clue as to how the smaller pieces of evidence fit together! Think about it!

How Many 9/11 “Anomalies” are Cause for Suspicion?

Tuesday, February 27th, 2007

Very few things baffle me more than how anyone, with all the information that has been pointed out, can not hold suspect the official explanation of the events of September 11th, 2001! It seems like every day a new piece of information comes to light that contradicts the official story yet people still have trouble coming to term with the ramifications of this trend.

I am not going to list the “anomalies” here. I am not even going to mention any. Suffice to say that you are being told that there is an apple in front of you and you are staring at an orange. All I am doing is pointing out the contradiction. What else needs to be seen before people suspect that the orange is not an apple? Think about it!

Bush: Incompetence or Complicity; Which is Worse?

Thursday, February 22nd, 2007

From the events of 9/11 to the ever worsening state of Iraq; from global warming to the pending end of public television, the damage being done to the world at the hands of the Bush administration, or under the watchful eyes of the Bush administration is real. Does it really matter whether or not the Bush cabal is causing these problems on purpose or as a result of unwavering ideology? Does it matter whether or not they believe that their actions will result in good things for us or if they are trying to destroy us on purpose? Do we have to believe the Downing Street Memos or the mounting evidence of 9/11 complicity at this point or can we just simply stop this nightmare regardless? At this point people need to stop the madness; we can not wait for the results of “investigations”; it will be too late for all of us!   Think about it!

So You Still Think Major Government Conspiracies Don’t Exist?

Tuesday, February 20th, 2007
Yesterday new footage of JFK was released to the public. This footage is yet another indication that the US government was most likely involved in the assassination. This film shows, as does many others, a Secret Service agent riding on the back of JFK’s limo and it shows two motorcycle police escorts riding along side the car, just behind JFK. Other films clearly show the head of the Secret Service calling back the agent just as the car was turning into the plaza where the fatal shots were fired. One of the agents called back shrugged his arms in disbelief three times when he was told to leave JFK’s car and retreat to the next car in the convoy. The rest of us should be shrugging our arms in disbelief that this happened.

Has this action by the head of the Secret Service ever been explained to the public? Is there an explanation that would account for this action?

Ten years after the Warren Commission issued the official white wash report, Congress held a new investigation into the assassination and they determined that there was at least one other shooter and that there was indeed a conspiracy to kill JFK yet the official story remains the same. Hello! Is anyone paying attention!

Between 9/11 and the invasion of Iraq we have conspiracies with a million times more evidence than we had regarding the JFK assassination, and people continue to disbelieve that conspiracies of this magnitude can take place. They took place, they take place and they are taking place. It is up to you to make sure we recognize this clear and obvious fact!  Think about it!


Bad Behavior has blocked 777 access attempts in the last 7 days.