<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flying a Plane Into the World Trade Center? Why Not Fly Out of LaGuardia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396</link>
	<description>Helping to Bring the Truth to the People</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gator</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396&cpage=1#comment-7083</link>
		<dc:creator>Gator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396#comment-7083</guid>
		<description>Here's a good one:  If the FAA was doing the reporting, were they the same FAA that did the reporting on the JFK Jr's disaster......and you want to believe them ?  You're better off in what they did then, was to turn it over to the Pentagon so you can believe them.  Oooh, we did that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a good one:  If the FAA was doing the reporting, were they the same FAA that did the reporting on the JFK Jr&#8217;s disaster&#8230;&#8230;and you want to believe them ?  You&#8217;re better off in what they did then, was to turn it over to the Pentagon so you can believe them.  Oooh, we did that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gator</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396&cpage=1#comment-7082</link>
		<dc:creator>Gator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396#comment-7082</guid>
		<description>You know, one of the problems I see is the fact, these flights dispatch and go directly to their destination, at 580 miles an hour, without missing their targets ?  Has anyone really looked at NY City ?  How do you pick-out the Towers while you're flying that fast and with pin-point accuracy, hit the damn things ?  It would be more believable if they circled the towers first before hitting, but we're told, they were master minds in aviation and geography....not to mention nuclear physics and mule riding !  

What kicks my butt is the part where they "order" the pilots to the rear of the planes ?  That's like driving down the road with a passenger in your car, telling you to hand over the wheel !  "yeah right, that happens all the time."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, one of the problems I see is the fact, these flights dispatch and go directly to their destination, at 580 miles an hour, without missing their targets ?  Has anyone really looked at NY City ?  How do you pick-out the Towers while you&#8217;re flying that fast and with pin-point accuracy, hit the damn things ?  It would be more believable if they circled the towers first before hitting, but we&#8217;re told, they were master minds in aviation and geography&#8230;.not to mention nuclear physics and mule riding !  </p>
<p>What kicks my butt is the part where they &#8220;order&#8221; the pilots to the rear of the planes ?  That&#8217;s like driving down the road with a passenger in your car, telling you to hand over the wheel !  &#8220;yeah right, that happens all the time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Occam</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396&cpage=1#comment-1479</link>
		<dc:creator>Occam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396#comment-1479</guid>
		<description>Wow, you guys are nuts. If they flew the planes out of NYC which the airports are only 2 minutes from the WTC, they'd have to start hijacking the planes while they were still sitting on the TARMAC. 

"We have been told that the so-called hijackers were barely able to pilot even simple two seater aircraft, but we are supposed to believe that they felt confident enough to navigate to NY from Boston without the help of ground control."

Who told you that? they all had their pilots licences, and the 4 that piloted the airplanes had dual engine certifications, and had used a 757 simulator for hours and hours. Whoever is telling you these "facts" is downright wrong. and you're downright stupid for believing it without doing research of your own. but of course... that's what fuels your movement... people with a lack of information, and a lack of motivation to actually search for the truth instead of believing everything you hear.

You guys need to open your eyes and stop listening to these kooks. but... you wont.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, you guys are nuts. If they flew the planes out of NYC which the airports are only 2 minutes from the WTC, they&#8217;d have to start hijacking the planes while they were still sitting on the TARMAC. </p>
<p>&#8220;We have been told that the so-called hijackers were barely able to pilot even simple two seater aircraft, but we are supposed to believe that they felt confident enough to navigate to NY from Boston without the help of ground control.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who told you that? they all had their pilots licences, and the 4 that piloted the airplanes had dual engine certifications, and had used a 757 simulator for hours and hours. Whoever is telling you these &#8220;facts&#8221; is downright wrong. and you&#8217;re downright stupid for believing it without doing research of your own. but of course&#8230; that&#8217;s what fuels your movement&#8230; people with a lack of information, and a lack of motivation to actually search for the truth instead of believing everything you hear.</p>
<p>You guys need to open your eyes and stop listening to these kooks. but&#8230; you wont.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigdaddy01</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396&cpage=1#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>bigdaddy01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>Regarding the DNA that a bunker refers to...who is to say there really was any DNA? How could there be any DNA when the two towers were reduced to dust...and for weeks after the demolitions, there was molten metal red hot inside the bases of the buildings...? There also was a repport that the Gov't got DNA results that identified the hijackers too...How on earth would such a thing be possible? what would the gov't match found samples against? Where did they get original DNA samples of these hijackers from? come on...too preposterous to believe...there was no DNA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the DNA that a bunker refers to&#8230;who is to say there really was any DNA? How could there be any DNA when the two towers were reduced to dust&#8230;and for weeks after the demolitions, there was molten metal red hot inside the bases of the buildings&#8230;? There also was a repport that the Gov&#8217;t got DNA results that identified the hijackers too&#8230;How on earth would such a thing be possible? what would the gov&#8217;t match found samples against? Where did they get original DNA samples of these hijackers from? come on&#8230;too preposterous to believe&#8230;there was no DNA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigdaddy01</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396&cpage=1#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>bigdaddy01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>Jesse, I just wanted to comment on the thought that there may not have been any one on the original planes...one individual I know if is actually missing. That is Barbara Olsen, the wife of the solicitor General. For that reason, I rather believe the passengers were sacrificed. anyway you cut it, there is no way a 757 hit the pentagon. Anyone who actually believes one did is simply blind and dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, I just wanted to comment on the thought that there may not have been any one on the original planes&#8230;one individual I know if is actually missing. That is Barbara Olsen, the wife of the solicitor General. For that reason, I rather believe the passengers were sacrificed. anyway you cut it, there is no way a 757 hit the pentagon. Anyone who actually believes one did is simply blind and dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie D. Bunker</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396&cpage=1#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Archie D. Bunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Hmm, midihc, why do &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; keep ignoring the DNA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, midihc, why do <i>you</i> keep ignoring the DNA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midihc</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396&cpage=1#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>midihc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396#comment-729</guid>
		<description>I have not seen any direct evidence of the "official theory", Mr. Bunker, but if there are mountains of evidence, proving it shouldn't be that hard, right? Please don't resort to immature disinformation tactics because that will falter our cause of investigating 9/11, which is something we all have in common, being that the official story does not hold any weight and the truth is out there.

Anyways, you want evidence for a hijack drill on 9/11? here:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&#38;before_9/11=militaryExercises

I also listened to the Betty Ong tape. She sounds suspiciously calm, I wish everyone acted like that in an emergancy situation. Perhaps she drank a lot of tap water before the phone call? (Sodium Flouride)

"Why is it so hard for you to accept the fact that 19 brainwashed murderers simply took advantage of an open society and a trusting nation that morning?"

I read the commission report but that still doesn't justify 2 huge buildings, made to withstand 2 major  commercial jet impacts, completely EXPLODING into smitherines.I didn't think much of it until every major news network started reporting "bombs in the buildings" and "additional expolosive blasts". ( Next day, there was no mention of such. on any network and there hasn't been since.)
Don't forget building 7! Abra Cadabra!?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y&#38;search=mineta
also check out Mr. Mineta's testimony.

That line about OJ Simpson makes you look like a disinformation agent. Don't hit below the belt unless you want to look more suspicious. 

"Your confession is floating in denial"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not seen any direct evidence of the &#8220;official theory&#8221;, Mr. Bunker, but if there are mountains of evidence, proving it shouldn&#8217;t be that hard, right? Please don&#8217;t resort to immature disinformation tactics because that will falter our cause of investigating 9/11, which is something we all have in common, being that the official story does not hold any weight and the truth is out there.</p>
<p>Anyways, you want evidence for a hijack drill on 9/11? here:<br />
<a href="http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&amp;before_9/11=militaryExercises" rel="nofollow">http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&amp;before_9/11=militaryExercises</a></p>
<p>I also listened to the Betty Ong tape. She sounds suspiciously calm, I wish everyone acted like that in an emergancy situation. Perhaps she drank a lot of tap water before the phone call? (Sodium Flouride)</p>
<p>&#8220;Why is it so hard for you to accept the fact that 19 brainwashed murderers simply took advantage of an open society and a trusting nation that morning?&#8221;</p>
<p>I read the commission report but that still doesn&#8217;t justify 2 huge buildings, made to withstand 2 major  commercial jet impacts, completely EXPLODING into smitherines.I didn&#8217;t think much of it until every major news network started reporting &#8220;bombs in the buildings&#8221; and &#8220;additional expolosive blasts&#8221;. ( Next day, there was no mention of such. on any network and there hasn&#8217;t been since.)<br />
Don&#8217;t forget building 7! Abra Cadabra!?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y&amp;search=mineta" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y&amp;search=mineta</a><br />
also check out Mr. Mineta&#8217;s testimony.</p>
<p>That line about OJ Simpson makes you look like a disinformation agent. Don&#8217;t hit below the belt unless you want to look more suspicious. </p>
<p>&#8220;Your confession is floating in denial&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie D. Bunker</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396&cpage=1#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>Archie D. Bunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396#comment-693</guid>
		<description>Jesse, why are you ignoring the statement from your own source:

&lt;i&gt;It is unknown whether any of the multiple overlapping war games included a hijack scenario on September 11.&lt;/i&gt;

Why are you pretending there was a hijack drill on 9/11 when there's no evidence for it?

&lt;b&gt;Why do you keep ignoring the DNA?&lt;/b&gt;

Why is it so hard for you to accept the fact that 19 brainwashed murderers simply took advantage of an open society and a trusting nation that morning?

Why do you cling to the  most tenuous and nonsensical explanations for the event and ignore the mountains of direct evidence that indeed do support the "official" version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, why are you ignoring the statement from your own source:</p>
<p><i>It is unknown whether any of the multiple overlapping war games included a hijack scenario on September 11.</i></p>
<p>Why are you pretending there was a hijack drill on 9/11 when there&#8217;s no evidence for it?</p>
<p><b>Why do you keep ignoring the DNA?</b></p>
<p>Why is it so hard for you to accept the fact that 19 brainwashed murderers simply took advantage of an open society and a trusting nation that morning?</p>
<p>Why do you cling to the  most tenuous and nonsensical explanations for the event and ignore the mountains of direct evidence that indeed do support the &#8220;official&#8221; version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396&cpage=1#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396#comment-690</guid>
		<description>Yes, I am saying that they were involved in drills. That is what I am saying. There were drills going on all over the east coast that day. These drills are designed to mock real emergencies. They are supposed to be as realistic as possible and if you listen to the tapes some of them don't even sound to realistic.

Yes, I am saying that the recordings were part of the multipe drill scenarios taking place that day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I am saying that they were involved in drills. That is what I am saying. There were drills going on all over the east coast that day. These drills are designed to mock real emergencies. They are supposed to be as realistic as possible and if you listen to the tapes some of them don&#8217;t even sound to realistic.</p>
<p>Yes, I am saying that the recordings were part of the multipe drill scenarios taking place that day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archie D. Bunker</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396&cpage=1#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Archie D. Bunker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=396#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Jesse are you serious?  You're telling me that the communications between flight attendants and the ground were part of a drill?  Are you saying that Betty Ong and Amy Sweeney  were involved in some kind of  NORAD exercise? 

&lt;i&gt;About five minutes after the hijacking began, Betty Ong contacted the American Airlines Southeastern Reservations Office in Cary, North Carolina, via an AT&#38;T airphone to report an emergency aboard the flight.&lt;/i&gt;

You're saying that NORAD would have involved some unsuspecting reservations office in their "drill", unconcerned about the panic that would ensue?  Or are you going to say that this office was involved as well?  What a tangled web you are weaving.

&lt;i&gt;"I suppose that you are not aware of the live hijacking simulations taking place that day".&lt;/i&gt;

To that I would respond with a line from your above link:

&lt;i&gt;It is unknown whether any of the multiple overlapping war games included a hijack scenario on September 11.&lt;/i&gt;

Here's &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betty_Ong" rel="nofollow"&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; right back at you.  Go to the links at the bottom.  Listen to Betty's words via "the memory hole".   Then, come back here and tell me that Betty and Amy were part of a drill.

I learned something there I didn't know.  Apparently Betty's remains were identified at the WTC.  Which brings up something else.  You seem to have ignored that aspect of my above posts.  If the planes were swithched, as you claim, how do you explain the DNA of so many of the passengers turning up at ground zero?   Was O.J. involved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse are you serious?  You&#8217;re telling me that the communications between flight attendants and the ground were part of a drill?  Are you saying that Betty Ong and Amy Sweeney  were involved in some kind of  NORAD exercise? </p>
<p><i>About five minutes after the hijacking began, Betty Ong contacted the American Airlines Southeastern Reservations Office in Cary, North Carolina, via an AT&amp;T airphone to report an emergency aboard the flight.</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re saying that NORAD would have involved some unsuspecting reservations office in their &#8220;drill&#8221;, unconcerned about the panic that would ensue?  Or are you going to say that this office was involved as well?  What a tangled web you are weaving.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;I suppose that you are not aware of the live hijacking simulations taking place that day&#8221;.</i></p>
<p>To that I would respond with a line from your above link:</p>
<p><i>It is unknown whether any of the multiple overlapping war games included a hijack scenario on September 11.</i></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betty_Ong" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a> right back at you.  Go to the links at the bottom.  Listen to Betty&#8217;s words via &#8220;the memory hole&#8221;.   Then, come back here and tell me that Betty and Amy were part of a drill.</p>
<p>I learned something there I didn&#8217;t know.  Apparently Betty&#8217;s remains were identified at the WTC.  Which brings up something else.  You seem to have ignored that aspect of my above posts.  If the planes were swithched, as you claim, how do you explain the DNA of so many of the passengers turning up at ground zero?   Was O.J. involved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
