<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking a Law is Legal in America; For George W. Bush</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=472</link>
	<description>Helping to Bring the Truth to the People</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=472&cpage=1#comment-4035</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=472#comment-4035</guid>
		<description>DS, that is a good link you provided. I know the site. Thank you!
Peace,
Jesse</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DS, that is a good link you provided. I know the site. Thank you!<br />
Peace,<br />
Jesse</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DS</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=472&cpage=1#comment-3772</link>
		<dc:creator>DS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=472#comment-3772</guid>
		<description>Send your mindless wrong-wingers to this article I just found: &lt;a HREF="http://www.fdrs.org/purpose_of_a_democracy.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Purpose of a Democracy&lt;/a&gt;. That should provide them a good shock to the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send your mindless wrong-wingers to this article I just found: <a HREF="http://www.fdrs.org/purpose_of_a_democracy.html" rel="nofollow">Purpose of a Democracy</a>. That should provide them a good shock to the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth Seeker on March 4, 1972 on January 7, 2003 on August 21, 2004, or no, sorry, actually</title>
		<link>http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=472&cpage=1#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth Seeker on March 4, 1972 on January 7, 2003 on August 21, 2004, or no, sorry, actually</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 02:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=472#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>Jesse, I don't think you even read my comments, but let me fill you in as to what you're up against:  People are so pathologically and contemptibly stupid that they cannot--yes, STILL, cannot--look past the name of their party, and see what the members of the party are actually doing.  Yes, I'm talking about idiot Republicans.

As an example, I argued with one particular Republican, wrong-winged freak about the warrantless wiretap issue.  I temporarily forgot that I was talking to an idiot who was immune to logic, and kept going on about the legalities.  I also quoted the Fourth Amendment.  The wrong-winger replied by saying that, shucks, "The Fourth Amendment only protects against UNREASONABLE searches and seizures.  It's not 'unreasonable' to wiretap people to track terrorists, so therefore there's nothing wrong with warrantless wiretaps!"

What the hell are you or I going to do to combat stupidity of this magnitude?  We're pissing in the wind, my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse, I don&#8217;t think you even read my comments, but let me fill you in as to what you&#8217;re up against:  People are so pathologically and contemptibly stupid that they cannot&#8211;yes, STILL, cannot&#8211;look past the name of their party, and see what the members of the party are actually doing.  Yes, I&#8217;m talking about idiot Republicans.</p>
<p>As an example, I argued with one particular Republican, wrong-winged freak about the warrantless wiretap issue.  I temporarily forgot that I was talking to an idiot who was immune to logic, and kept going on about the legalities.  I also quoted the Fourth Amendment.  The wrong-winger replied by saying that, shucks, &#8220;The Fourth Amendment only protects against UNREASONABLE searches and seizures.  It&#8217;s not &#8216;unreasonable&#8217; to wiretap people to track terrorists, so therefore there&#8217;s nothing wrong with warrantless wiretaps!&#8221;</p>
<p>What the hell are you or I going to do to combat stupidity of this magnitude?  We&#8217;re pissing in the wind, my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
