Comments on: Who Gave the Order to Turn on Bush? http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=544 Helping to Bring the Truth to the People Sat, 18 May 2013 14:01:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: binladensucks http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=544&cpage=1#comment-5033 binladensucks Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:51:55 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=544#comment-5033 The media started attacking Bush because it was the popular thing to do. The problem with the media is not that their biased but that they only care about whats popular. Look at the downing street memo, CNN, New York Times, Washington Post, all the major news people except for Fox news of course (please stop calling them a tool of the government, we already know that they are right wing, using them as an example doesn't work anymore) but all of thoses networks had storys about the memo, they've also had stories about impeacment, the 9-11 conspiracy lies. The reason why non of that made a huge difference is not that they were biased but because, sadly not enough people cared. The media started attacking Bush because it was the popular thing to do. The problem with the media is not that their biased but that they only care about whats popular. Look at the downing street memo, CNN, New York Times, Washington Post, all the major news people except for Fox news of course (please stop calling them a tool of the government, we already know that they are right wing, using them as an example doesn’t work anymore) but all of thoses networks had storys about the memo, they’ve also had stories about impeacment, the 9-11 conspiracy lies. The reason why non of that made a huge difference is not that they were biased but because, sadly not enough people cared.

]]> By: sinjohn http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=544&cpage=1#comment-4983 sinjohn Sun, 14 Jan 2007 04:52:18 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=544#comment-4983 It did seem like an onslaught, but it has been coming for awhile, Jessie. I think it began with Olbermann's first comment. Then we had Scarborough, of all people, questioning Bush's mental capacity; devoting a whole segment to it. Fox's numbers have been on a steady race down-hill ever since Katrina and MSNBC has been gaining viewers like they were paying 'em to watch. Could be that the CEOs of these outfits see exactly what we all see. This presidency is toast, for all practical purposes.Anything Bush does now is only going to make things worse, from getting more of our men and women slaughtered, as well as Iraqis, to driving the price of fuel through the roof and, therefore, the price everything else. Iran is switching to petro-euros and driving the the dollar to ruin, all at a healthy profit. There is no telling what Junior might do, but there is one thing that any fool can see. Our economic future is down-hill from here and we had trillions in projected surpluses when Bush and Cheney came to office. See you in the soup lines, my friend. It did seem like an onslaught, but it has been coming for awhile, Jessie. I think it began with Olbermann’s first comment.

Then we had Scarborough, of all people, questioning Bush’s mental capacity; devoting a whole segment to it.

Fox’s numbers have been on a steady race down-hill ever since Katrina and MSNBC has been gaining viewers like they were paying ‘em to watch.

Could be that the CEOs of these outfits see exactly what we all see. This presidency is toast, for all practical purposes.Anything Bush does now is only going to make things worse, from getting more of our men and women slaughtered, as well as Iraqis, to driving the price of fuel through the roof and, therefore, the price everything else.

Iran is switching to petro-euros and driving the the dollar to ruin, all at a healthy profit. There is no telling what Junior might do, but there is one thing that any fool can see.

Our economic future is down-hill from here and we had trillions in projected surpluses when Bush and Cheney came to office.

See you in the soup lines, my friend.

]]> By: johnmccarthy http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=544&cpage=1#comment-4981 johnmccarthy Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:53:43 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=544#comment-4981 You forgot the Washington Post, Jesse! Have you missed todays article about Bush meeting "SKEPTICISM" on the hill? Yes, Aboramawitcz and Weisman used the soft word "SKEPTICISM" in their headline. Meeting "SKEPTICISM" like "this president's plan is the worst foreign policy blunder since the Vietnam War" is only "Skepticism". They should have used the word REVOLT. But the editor at the WP allows them to carry dual passports so what can I say? You forgot the Washington Post, Jesse! Have you missed todays article about Bush meeting “SKEPTICISM” on the hill? Yes, Aboramawitcz and Weisman used the soft word “SKEPTICISM” in their headline. Meeting “SKEPTICISM” like “this president’s plan is the worst foreign policy blunder since the Vietnam War” is only “Skepticism”. They should have used the word REVOLT. But the editor at the WP allows them to carry dual passports so what can I say?

]]>