Comments on: 9/11 in Perspective : Flight 93 and WTC7 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573 Helping to Bring the Truth to the People Thu, 23 May 2013 13:36:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: TvNewsLIES.org » Archive » Testifying Behind Closed Doors, Not Under Oath with No Notes or Recordings: Sound Familiar? http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573&cpage=1#comment-5378 TvNewsLIES.org » Archive » Testifying Behind Closed Doors, Not Under Oath with No Notes or Recordings: Sound Familiar? Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:19:09 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573#comment-5378 [...] As we watch the US Attorney firing scandal unfold and we watch the standoff between the Bush administration and Congress over who will testify and under what conditions they will do so, I want you to remember back to the 9/11 Commission hearings. You remember the 9/11 Commission, don’t you? They are the people who neglected to mention in their report that WTC7’s destruction took place on that day. They are also the guys who did not report about the multiple war games taking place in the northeast corridor that day. Anyway, my point is that I want you to recall the conditions set by George W. Bush for his participation in that most important investigation. Bush would only testify if his testimony was private, limited to one hour, not under oath, not recorded in any way shape or form, excluded all 9/11 Commission members except the co-chairman, and with Dick Cheney by his side. [...] [...] As we watch the US Attorney firing scandal unfold and we watch the standoff between the Bush administration and Congress over who will testify and under what conditions they will do so, I want you to remember back to the 9/11 Commission hearings. You remember the 9/11 Commission, don’t you? They are the people who neglected to mention in their report that WTC7’s destruction took place on that day. They are also the guys who did not report about the multiple war games taking place in the northeast corridor that day. Anyway, my point is that I want you to recall the conditions set by George W. Bush for his participation in that most important investigation. Bush would only testify if his testimony was private, limited to one hour, not under oath, not recorded in any way shape or form, excluded all 9/11 Commission members except the co-chairman, and with Dick Cheney by his side. [...]

]]> By: jerseyjay http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573&cpage=1#comment-5365 jerseyjay Thu, 15 Mar 2007 03:17:53 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573#comment-5365 Jesse - I was excited to see your article. I came to this very conclusion about a year ago but have only expressed it to my wife and 9-11 truth type friends. When all the reports mentions 4 hijacked planes and 4 buildings down or damaged, it starts to sound logical. With this in mind, I was watching a report that, like most, mentions the fact that wTC 2 was hit second and fell first. That opened WTC 7 up on the south side for a hit. When Flight 93 never arrived, they were in trouble and had to bite the bullet and drop the building. I believe Flight 93 was downed by a lone jetfighter that slipped through the smokescreen. This really does answer a lot of questions and I fully agree. Thanks. Jesse - I was excited to see your article. I came to this very conclusion about a year ago but have only expressed it to my wife and 9-11 truth type friends. When all the reports mentions 4 hijacked planes and 4 buildings down or damaged, it starts to sound logical. With this in mind, I was watching a report that, like most, mentions the fact that wTC 2 was hit second and fell first. That opened WTC 7 up on the south side for a hit. When Flight 93 never arrived, they were in trouble and had to bite the bullet and drop the building. I believe Flight 93 was downed by a lone jetfighter that slipped through the smokescreen.

This really does answer a lot of questions and I fully agree. Thanks.

]]> By: :: Dawn’s World :: » Blog Archive » 9/11 in Perspective – Flight 93 & WTC7 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573&cpage=1#comment-5352 :: Dawn’s World :: » Blog Archive » 9/11 in Perspective – Flight 93 & WTC7 Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:21:12 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573#comment-5352 [...] http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573 [...] [...] http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573 [...]

]]> By: robalb http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573&cpage=1#comment-5348 robalb Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:17:18 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573#comment-5348 I don't have much to add to what's already been said. I simply want to express my thanks to Jesse for his hard work and dedication to uncovering truth in so many areas. I don’t have much to add to what’s already been said. I simply want to express my thanks to Jesse for his hard work and dedication to uncovering truth in so many areas.

]]> By: MichaelR http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573&cpage=1#comment-5347 MichaelR Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:29:44 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573#comment-5347 p.p.s. I am not Michael Rivero at WRH.. sorry if you sought so due to my login name. p.p.s. I am not Michael Rivero at WRH.. sorry if you sought so due to my login name.

]]> By: MichaelR http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573&cpage=1#comment-5346 MichaelR Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:21:57 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573#comment-5346 p.s. I do NOT agree with this part of the report : "I believe that flight 93 was, to the surprise of the rogues running the operation, shot down by some true American patriot who was performing his or her duty. " If they were a true American patriot, then they (or co-pilot), or colleagues or family they would have spoken to, would have come forward by now. It is more logical that the shooting down was deliberate, especially to be ready with the coverup story that the passengers deliberately flew the plane into the ground to prevent it reaching a city. This is non-sense, not least since the passengers could not have known that where they were going to hit the group wasn't a built up area. p.s. I do NOT agree with this part of the report :
“I believe that flight 93 was, to the surprise of the rogues running the operation, shot down by some true American patriot who was performing his or her duty. ”

If they were a true American patriot, then they (or co-pilot), or colleagues or family they would have spoken to, would have come forward by now. It is more logical that the shooting down was deliberate, especially to be ready with the coverup story that the passengers deliberately flew the plane into the ground to prevent it reaching a city. This is non-sense, not least since the passengers could not have known that where they were going to hit the group wasn’t a built up area.

]]> By: MichaelR http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573&cpage=1#comment-5345 MichaelR Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:15:13 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573#comment-5345 Following the above "big picture" theory, i.e. the plan went wrong and they still had to it "pull" WTC 7, then maybe Flight 93 was also shot down because the plane deviated from the plans .. and had no target it could get to. It couldn't land because the "hijackers" would be interrogated (or if there was any remote control, the equipment would be found). One possible twist on this is the following piece of the puzzle : "the missing LAST few minutes of the cockpit data recorder" on Flight 93. This could make sense IF the passengers managed to overcome the hijackers, but the plane was still shot down to prevent the real Hijackers (or the means of remote control) being discovered. Following the above “big picture” theory, i.e. the plan went wrong and they still had to it “pull” WTC 7, then maybe Flight 93 was also shot down because the plane deviated from the plans
.. and had no target it could get to. It couldn’t land because the “hijackers” would be interrogated (or if there was any remote control, the equipment would be found).

One possible twist on this is the following piece of the puzzle : “the missing LAST few minutes of the cockpit data recorder” on Flight 93. This could make sense IF the passengers managed to overcome the hijackers, but the plane was still shot down to prevent the real Hijackers (or the means of remote control) being discovered.

]]> By: MichaelR http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573&cpage=1#comment-5344 MichaelR Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:59:39 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573#comment-5344 Just a thought : If the plan was for Flight 93 (or any other airplane) to hit WTC7 which would collapse like WTC1 & 2, then if the plane didn't make it (for any reason), then WTC 7 still had to be brought down otherwise investigators would have found the pre-positioned explosives, and the game would be up. What's the chances the fire in WTC7 was started deliberately, or if not deliberately, allowed to grow to give "plausible" deniability when WTC 7 was eventually demolitioned by the pre-positioned explosives.? Just a thought : If the plan was for Flight 93 (or any other airplane) to hit WTC7 which would collapse like WTC1 & 2, then if the plane didn’t make it (for any reason), then WTC 7 still had to be brought down otherwise investigators would have found the pre-positioned explosives, and the game would be up.

What’s the chances the fire in WTC7 was started deliberately, or if not deliberately, allowed to grow to give “plausible” deniability when WTC 7 was eventually demolitioned by the pre-positioned explosives.?

]]> By: Passenger57 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573&cpage=1#comment-5343 Passenger57 Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:51:49 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573#comment-5343 VERY good point about the rapid reconstruction of WTC7. Never thought of that ; will spread the word. I also heard that many of the WTC execs were at a Warren Buffett "meeting" at Offutt AFB-which just so happened to be Bush's second stop on hid "Don't Go Back To DC" Tour on 9/11. I love how people can construct an entire hypothetical scenario that adheres to the "Official Story" - but when people like Jesse do the SAME THING but claim government complicity, well,that's ridiculous! People who think the attacks were an inside job usually take ALL circumstances into consideration.Sure, a raging fire MIGHT bring down a building eventually-maybe after 2 or three days of fire - MAYBE- but don't try to claim that this OVERBUILT building -far away from the Towers-came down in a matter of hours, while a building ADJACENT to the Towers-ALSO heavily damaged and ALSO with fuel storage tanks that ruptured and burned- not only still stands,but has to be dismantled. They made a plausible claim that the asbestos dust and other gunk would spread all over if the building were inploded - but now I think they didn't want anyone to see how REMARKABLY SIMILAR a PLANNED implosion would have looked to the "ACCIDENTAL" ones! VERY good point about the rapid reconstruction of WTC7. Never thought of that ; will spread the word.
I also heard that many of the WTC execs were at a Warren Buffett “meeting” at Offutt AFB-which just so happened to be Bush’s second stop on hid “Don’t Go Back To DC” Tour on 9/11.
I love how people can construct an entire hypothetical scenario that adheres to the “Official Story” - but when people like Jesse do the SAME THING but claim government complicity, well,that’s ridiculous!
People who think the attacks were an inside job usually take ALL circumstances into consideration.Sure, a raging fire MIGHT bring down a building eventually-maybe after 2 or three days of fire - MAYBE- but don’t try to claim that this OVERBUILT building -far away from the Towers-came down in a matter of hours, while a building ADJACENT to the Towers-ALSO heavily damaged and ALSO with fuel storage tanks that ruptured and burned- not only still stands,but has to be dismantled.
They made a plausible claim that the asbestos dust and other gunk would spread all over if the building were inploded - but now I think they didn’t want anyone to see how REMARKABLY SIMILAR a PLANNED implosion would have looked to the “ACCIDENTAL” ones!

]]> By: DG http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573&cpage=1#comment-5342 DG Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:44:49 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573#comment-5342 Sorry to be picky. "I don’t think 93 was shot down however, as the planes imprint in Shanksville shows grass overgrowing where the wings allegedly plowed into the ground. And there was no wreckage." That is the point! If the plane was shot down there would be no wreckage apart from thousands of little pieces!! "If everyone will remember, there was at one point reports that 5 aircraft had been hijacked and believe that this will help us understand other aspects which probably went wrong." There were lots of reports about there being other hi-jacked aircraft because of all the War Games that were going on. Good article Jesse. Power to the People! Sorry to be picky.

“I don’t think 93 was shot down however, as the planes imprint in Shanksville shows grass overgrowing where the wings allegedly plowed into the ground. And there was no wreckage.”

That is the point! If the plane was shot down there would be no wreckage apart from thousands of little pieces!!

“If everyone will remember, there was at one point reports that 5 aircraft had been hijacked and believe that this will help us understand other aspects which probably went wrong.”

There were lots of reports about there being other hi-jacked aircraft because of all the War Games that were going on.

Good article Jesse. Power to the People!

]]>