Esoteric knowledge and symbolism aside, there were no planes entering the WTC Towers on 911. Perhaps all the related films produced before and since were made to condition the public into acceptance of the official “planes” fantasy.

Believing the government’s fairytale of planes colliding with the Towers is the main problem w/ fully understanding 911. The media was broadcasting fake, manipulated images of planes. Superimposing a plane on 911 was done w/ Wescam technology; it provided a single “live” feed from which all the TV networks broadcast. Other videos & images started to appear in the days, weeks & months following 911. All of them have anomalies & impossibilities which can only be explained by excluding planes.

Real planes would have been a potential liability for the perps on 911. It was easier to control the outcome of the event with much less risk by using the media to broadcast fake imagery. Real jets might miss their targets, get shot down, suffer pilot or computer errors, destroy or prematurely detonate any explosives, passengers could have overtaken the hijackers, and/or the plane might not inflict enough perceived damage to make a collapse believable.

A single fact which cannot be refuted is that a hollow aluminum plane (especially fragile wings) cannot slice through steel beams and concrete without any damage to the plane. News footage showing an airliner gliding into a Tower without any resistance is a cartoon. Aluminum planes are not built for impact and crumple immediately upon contact with solid objects; even a small bird can rip through a jet’s wing.

Furthermore, a large speeding jet’s vortex trails behind it creating a highly active atmosphere which follows in its path. Had a real plane impacted a WTC Tower, real film footage would have recorded the airliner’s vortex interacting with and violently dissipating the smoke from the alleged crash and the adjacent North Tower. No vortex literally means no planes on 911 (TV fakery).

During the South Tower “impact”, fake TV footage shows a WTC Tower sealing itself around the plane during the alleged penetration. Still another too incredible to believe anomaly is the width of the plane’s purported gash didn’t match the width of a Boeing 757’s wing span. Another widely publicized video shot by Scott Myers shows the forward fuselage of the “jet” exiting the South Tower, though other shots later reveal no exit hole.

To consider the media footage showing a plane slicing thru steel and concrete as reality is ludicrous. There were no planes; only spoofed images, manipulated witnesses and falsified evidence. America please wake up; the media was a complicit partner that was in on the crime from the beginning. In fact, the TV psyop 911 couldn’t have been pulled off without the mass media’s assistance.

Actually “no planes on 911? is the only explanation that makes any sense. There are far to many disturbing questions left unanswered which only TV fakery can address.

Besides all the other impossibilities I mentioned, why are there several “hijackers” still alive; some are even suing the US government to recover their reputation and good name.

Why have so many of the purported plane “victims” not been listed in the Social Security Death Index? …and their families not claimed the death $$benefits?

Why are there missing passenger lists and zero so-called Middle Eastern hijacker names on the flight manifest?

Why in the entire history of aviation has a plane never disappeared from a crash - yet on 911, four of them did in a single day? All plane parts are numbered; not one plane part from 911 has been identified by its number.

How could supposedly inexperienced “pilots” who couldn’t even fly a Cessna?

* threaten and subdue everyone on board
* break into the locked cockpits w/ their hands
* kill all the pilots and copilots

…then navigate a large Boeing jetliner above the clouds all over several states without airport tower assistance, with nav systems & radios turned off, and fly with pinpoint accuracy into a building that they couldn’t even see?

Not to mention that a Boeing 757 can’t fly at 500+ MPH at sea level - the air is too thick. Call Boeing; even they admit that - and they have been recorded in phone conversations recently.

Exposing “no planes on 911″ is probably the most important story to people beyond chemtrails, depleted uranium poisoning and nanotech genocide.

Americans are TV hypnotized, drugged up, dumbed down and so utterly dependent that in general they are incapable and disinterested in discovering how the media is adversely affecting their lives.

No planes on 911 and deception by the media is the Holy Grail of 911. It marks the beginning of an Orwellian double-speak mind-set which is now accepted as normal by the populace.

No-planes on 911 is highly important as it exposes the real perps behind this mass murder and offers justice to the thousands of people killed that day.

Without the covert deception by the media in collusion with the enemy in control of America’s military intelligence, 911 could not have happened.

The media was directly involved in 911 and together with a criminal government has helped diminish Americans’ freedoms and launch unending wars against innocent nations.

# # #

“Levels of the Game”
by P. Orin Zack
(08/05/2007)
http://klurgsheld.wordpress.com/2007/08/06/short-story-levels-of-the-game/

Other than putting myself in a fictional context, I also used other like-to-like events as a frame of reference, to bring myself to acceptance.

Those like-to-like events are numerous; several events come immediately to mind.

The 7/7 London Subway Bombing is easier to for me accept because it took place outside of my country, orchestrated by a government other than mine.

Another like-to-like event was the burning of the Reichstag, again, outside of this country.

Let’s look closer, at the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. The attack was a lie, but many accepted the fact; hence it’s called an incident, not a conspiracy.

It’s my hope that the ‘9/11 Conspiracy Theory’ will eventually turn into the ‘9/11 Conspiracy,’ and ultimately into the ‘9/11 Incident,’ seen in the same light as the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_Incident

- “The 9/11 Incident, not WMD, is Bush’s biggest lie.” -HenryFord555

As it happens, I posted a new story last night that addresses this very issue. It’s called “Levels of the Game”.
http://klurgsheld.wordpress.com/2007/08/06/short-story-levels-of-the-game/

Some Americans can’t seem to grasp the lie around 911 because their mind cannot accept that our government could be involved in anything so sinister as killing innocent Americans. It goes against all of our programing of what this country’s government has stood for since the Declaration of Independence.
The truth of 911 would shatter all of their mental programs because it would conflict with their established and engrained beliefs learned. The truth would be too cruel and the mind will block all things that are unpleasant.

“And The Truth Shall Set You Free”

I began my deprograming when the Supreme Court handed over the election to Bush. I can see clearly now thanks to Toto (Wizard of Oz).

Personally my initial reaction was that the towers, since being built so tall, were built with a design compromise. Hence, when subject to high jet-fuel temperature, the towers shattered into pieces like a broken window of a stolen vehicle.

Do I have this let-bygone-be-bygone attitude? Fortunately I am not exactly like the ducklings in possession of this amazing quality of imprinting (i.e. the first moving thing I see must be my mother; I better follow ‘her’).

In all likelihood, there will be another first impression, and another first impression - courtesy of the group that brought you the ‘Paris Hilton Live’ to be begin with.

Remember: The rebuilt Al Qaeda is stronger than ever. Something is cooking…

Could this be, perhaps, as simple as “You never have a second chance to make a first impression?”

It’s just part of the way humans are built: First impressions stick harder than second impressions.

The Bush Administration and the Main Stream Corporate-owned Media know this, so they use it to their full advantage.

They knew that if they could get the idea of “islamic hijackers with boxcutters” out there first, it would be virtually impossible for anybody to replace this first impression with “inside job” no matter how much evidence eventually turned up…it just takes an so much energy for people to form a second opinion, that most won’t or can’t expend the energy to really do it.

Same principle was used with Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman…once they were in the headlines as heroic patriot martyrs, it didn’t matter that the initial stories were found to be patriotic fairy tales…most Americans never learned the truth, which DID eventually get told in both cases.

In the case of 9/11, I think it would take a huge shock associated with the subject to clear the mass “first impression” programming in order to replace it with another “first impression” of the truth — that there is overwhelming evidence of inside complicity. Without some shocking news to remove the first impression, 9/11 will continue to be a murky, avoided subject in the minds of most Americans — not unlike the lone gunman theory of the Kennedy assassination, which even a deathbed confession from E. Howard Hunt explaining how the CIA did it has failed to overcome.

In short, the 9/11 Truth movement needs to quit framing their arguments as reactions to the official story which has already left a first impression seared with the shock of the original event, and start presenting the facts framed as shocking, totally new “News”.

How that can be done, I haven’t figured out yet, but it would need to create a jolt and then supply the relevant information. Maybe one of the 9/11 truth groups could arrange to try to reproduce the melting of a steel beam with a fire fueled by kerosene and office furniture with Paris Hilton strapped to the top…maybe something like that would be enough of a jolt to get the masses to really see the WTC collapses with fresh eyes again…

Exactly.

The old tactic of self inflicted wounds, as some call it the no-pain-no-gain approach.

And it doesn’t take much for the psychopaths to commit self inflicted wounds.

Nobody in his right mind should arrange or continue an ‘honor’ system with the psychopaths.

Realize the inherent conflict of interest, which is…

The more we the people are attacked, the more power will be gained by the ‘protectors.’

The problem is that the ‘protectors’ we entrusted is a gang of psychopaths.

What will come out from this conflict-of-interest scenario?

It’s hard enough for a saint to resist.

Better not to expect this group of psychopaths to respect or honor our trust we placed on them.