Comments on: More About Those Nuclear Attack Speculations http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=78 Helping to Bring the Truth to the People Sun, 19 May 2013 16:26:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: CyberChas http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=78&cpage=1#comment-90 CyberChas Thu, 04 Aug 2005 19:45:30 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=78#comment-90 I have been tracking the election on Tuesday in the Ohio 2nd Congressional District. Clearly it was another "questionable" result. And, I think it was done for a couple of reasons. Firstly, a victory by the anti-war vet Hackett would have been a very bad PR situation for the PNAC/WH. It would have given the few remaining "loose cannons" in the right-wing spin-machine controlled media something to hang their teeth on in their "the war is going bad" stories. It would have put a FIRST crack in the dam that is Republican control of congress, and it would have energized the fight to take back the house and senate in '06. No, that would have been bad. But, even more important, I think they wanted to produce a fairly BLATANT looking fraud to see if people would even care and if they really had the media well locked-down. They needed to "dry run" their plans for '06 to make sure they were well set. YES, they might go the "martial law" approach to keeping power, but they might also simply go the "fear" approach after a terrorist incident. They would begin to label Dems as "non-patriotic" and "pro-terrorist" if they didn't vote for Patriot III on the first vote, and hope to enable their continued theft of congress. Just as they did a "dry run" on the whole election fraud with Hagel's election in 98, I think Paul Hackett's defeat in the Ohio 2nd was a test run for another massive national election fraud in November of 2006. And, they were successful. Except for a few isolated instances in the blogsphere, this story is dead and they pulled off their silent coup once more. I fear for our republic. Charlie L Portland, OR CLL2001@Gmail.com I have been tracking the election on Tuesday in the Ohio 2nd Congressional District. Clearly it was another “questionable” result. And, I think it was done for a couple of reasons. Firstly, a victory by the anti-war vet Hackett would have been a very bad PR situation for the PNAC/WH. It would have given the few remaining “loose cannons” in the right-wing spin-machine controlled media something to hang their teeth on in their “the war is going bad” stories. It would have put a FIRST crack in the dam that is Republican control of congress, and it would have energized the fight to take back the house and senate in ‘06. No, that would have been bad.

But, even more important, I think they wanted to produce a fairly BLATANT looking fraud to see if people would even care and if they really had the media well locked-down. They needed to “dry run” their plans for ‘06 to make sure they were well set.

YES, they might go the “martial law” approach to keeping power, but they might also simply go the “fear” approach after a terrorist incident. They would begin to label Dems as “non-patriotic” and “pro-terrorist” if they didn’t vote for Patriot III on the first vote, and hope to enable their continued theft of congress.

Just as they did a “dry run” on the whole election fraud with Hagel’s election in 98, I think Paul Hackett’s defeat in the Ohio 2nd was a test run for another massive national election fraud in November of 2006.

And, they were successful. Except for a few isolated instances in the blogsphere, this story is dead and they pulled off their silent coup once more.

I fear for our republic.

Charlie L
Portland, OR
CLL2001@Gmail.com

]]> By: jhawk620 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=78&cpage=1#comment-89 jhawk620 Thu, 04 Aug 2005 18:42:12 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=78#comment-89 You are very accurate about the connection of Enron to 9-11. Also, a major criminal investigation of Exxon/Mobil was ongoing at that time also. George W. Bush is simply a pawn in the hands of his controller, Cheney. He is expendable, as was Reagan. GWB is a classic example of an individual who has been subjected to intense, and from an early age, trauma-based mind control, a la MKULTRA. This is not speculation. It is evidenced in his behavior and speeech patterns. We should feel sorry for him, and concentarte on the real gangsters, the PNAC-ers! You are very accurate about the connection of Enron to 9-11. Also, a major criminal investigation of Exxon/Mobil was ongoing at that time also. George W. Bush is simply a pawn in the hands of his controller, Cheney. He is expendable, as was Reagan. GWB is a classic example of an individual who has been subjected to intense, and from an early age, trauma-based mind control, a la MKULTRA.

This is not speculation. It is evidenced in his behavior and speeech patterns. We should feel sorry for him, and concentarte on the real gangsters, the PNAC-ers!

]]> By: TvNewsLIES.org » Blog Archive » About Those Nuclear Attack Speculations http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=78&cpage=1#comment-88 TvNewsLIES.org » Blog Archive » About Those Nuclear Attack Speculations Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:39:55 +0000 http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=78#comment-88 ]]>