Archive for July, 2005

Growing Economy? Think Again!

Saturday, July 23rd, 2005

Saying that the economy is growing while job losses are increasing is like saying that your healthy except for your terminal disease. How do they measure the economy?

If they simply look at totals and averages the results will be misleading. If the averages go up yet the wealth distribution goes down that simply means that the rich are getting richer and more people are becoming poor. Using current evaluation methods can make even the most unbalances failure of an economy appear positive. Don’t let the blanket assessments fool you! Think about it!

What’s With All the Leaks?

Friday, July 22nd, 2005

Who is doing all the leaking these days? The Bush White House has been the most secretive and tight lipped administration in memory. Where are all this leaked information coming from? Could information be leaked for disinformation purposes? We are seeing leaks about the Rove investigation, leaked GOP talking points, leaked information about the Downing Street Memo…who is doing all the leaking and where were they for the past 5 years? Hmmm…I am starting to get suspicious about the leaks. Bush does not tolerate leaks yet nobody seems to be paying a price for leaking. How is this possible?

George W. Bush is a Goddamn Liar - Part Deux

Thursday, July 21st, 2005

George W. Bush is a Goddamn Liar - Part Deaux

If George W. Bush tells us that we invaded Iraq because Saddam did not let the inspectors in, and we all know that the inspectors were indeed let in, then how does anyone not realize we are being lied to about the reason for going to war? It is SO OBVIOUS!

When George W. Bush opens his mouth out come blatant lies. But this lie was not just one of his usual lies where he twists his words so badly that you don’t even know what he is trying to say. This lie was his most blatant lie, the one that started a war, the one that got over 1700 Americans and 10’s of thousands of INNOCENT Iraqis killed. Remember the lie that he told the world on television? The lie: that he gave Saddam Hussein “a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn’t let them in.”

George W. Bush has repeated time and time again that he invaded Iraq because Saddam would not cooperate and that he would not let the inspectors in. What the hell is he talking about? Is the entire nation in a coma? Is every member of Congress completely insane? Does any member of the media have a functioning brain? Is there a single god damn Bush supporter who realizes that this is a lie?

This repeated lie is the conclusive evidence that we went to war based on lies. HEY YOU AMERICANS WHO MIGHT BE IN A COMA…WAKE UP…SADDAM LET THE INSPECTORS IN! Does the name Hans Blix ring a bell?

Reality check: The Downing Street minutes, that have been so shamefully ignored by the US media, show us why this was done.

One of the memo’s stated the following:

“It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force. … The Prime Minister said that it would make a big difference politically and legally if Saddam refused to allow in the UN inspectors.”

Enough said. Remember that this was the LAST of a series of lies…each one pulled out of the Bush/PNAC hat as the others failed. How much longer can we allow this to go unchallenged?

If George W. Bush tells us that we invaded Iraq because Saddam did not let the inspectors in, and we all know that the inspectors were indeed let in, then how does anyone not realize we are being lied to about the reason for going to war? It is SO OBVIOUS!

WHAT THE HELL IS GEORGE W. BUSH TALKING ABOUT? This is so surreal that words can not describe it. This reminds me of situations where you might be at a party having a conversation with some people you just met and a person joins in and starts making completely insane comments and claims. Everyone simply stays quiet until this obviously crazy person leaves. The comments made were so insane that it was clear to everyone that the person who was talking was not all there, so nobody says anything, they just let him talk. Well this seems to be the situation but in this case the entire nation is holding the conversation and George W. Bush is the crazy person who chimes in with statements so ludicrous that all remain silent.

This is not a joke people. George W. Bush’s insane comments took our nation to war. It is the reason that 100,000 are dead and more are dying every day.

Here is a little fact for you all: In this particular case George W. Bush is either a liar or he is completely out of his mind. Either way this has to be addressed. It can not be permitted to continue. Who is going to stop this insanity? We have a madman or a liar as our president!

SOMEBODY MUST ASK GEORGE W. BUSH TO PUBLICLY EXPLAIN HIS REPEATED FALSE ASSERTION THAT SADDAM HUSSEIN DID NOT LET THE INSPECTORS IN!

So once again I plead for someone in our press to ask him the Goddamn question!

Jesse - Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

Related:
Ask the Goddamn Quesion - Part 1

Reference:
Washington Post Article: Link

Bush said the CIA’s doubts about the charge — that Iraq sought to buy “yellowcake” uranium ore in Africa — were “subsequent” to the Jan. 28 State of the Union speech in which Bush made the allegation. Defending the broader decision to go to war with Iraq, the president said the decision was made after he gave Saddam Hussein “a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn’t let them in.”

Details, Details

Thursday, July 21st, 2005

This morning CNN was holding a live interview with someone in Aruba regarding the missing Holloway woman. They are discussing the latest detail of the case which is the fact that they are doing DNA testing on hair that was found on some duct tape. The pretend journalist lady person also brought up the fact that she understands that they will be doing layered voice analysis as well. The pretend journalists is making the interviewee “back up” and explain all the details of what this voice technology is and she wants to know if it is used in the US. This pretend journalist really did some homework on this issue that has no affect on the nation.

When was the last time you heard that kind of detail examined on CNN about a vital issue? When do you see the toy news men and women use their questioning skills on issues that affect us? When have they ever made a politician “back up” and explain something that they just said? Wouldn’t it be nice if these pretend journalists used their skills for our benefit? Think about it!

WTC 7 and the Missing Plane

Wednesday, July 20th, 2005

If we are told that Building 7 could collapse without a plane having hit it, why then must we believe that towers 1 & 2 came down as a result of planes hitting them? Can you say “contradiction?” Could the towers have collapsed without planes hitting them or for some other reason as did Building 7?

Theory: Building 7 was supposed to be hit by Flight 93 but Flight 93 was shot down by a pilot who was doing his job and was not in on the plot. The planes hitting the towers were the cover story for the cause of collapses.

Do you remember Donald Rumsfeld’s little slip of the tongue when he spoke about the events of 9/11 and about the plane that was “shot down” over Pennsylvania? What if that was not misspeak? What if that was just a Freudian slip where the truth mistakenly came out?

Let’s assume that the part of the goal of the attacks was to destroy all 3 main WTC buildings; WTC 1, 2 & 7. Let’s assume the plan was to crash a plane into each of the 3 buildings and then at a later time set off charges that had been placed throughout the buildings by people who appear to be doing routine or special building construction or reconstruction projects.

Here is where things might have gone wrong. Towers 1 & 2 were hit directly by aircraft. Even if the visual & scientific evidence indicate that the collapses were NOT the result of the collisions or of the pursuant fires caused by the collisions, it is quite understandable how a trusting public can accept the official explanation for the collapses of the 2 main towers based on the planes crashing into them.

Building 7 is different. Building 7 went down in what can only be described as a perfect controlled manner where all supporting structures gave way at precisely the same time resulting in a perfect vertical drop. The building did not tilt, it did not start to lean, it did not show signs of stress, it simply dropped to the ground with the inside dropping before the shell (standard procedure in controlled demolitions so that the walls fall inward and create a small footprint). Had a plane hit this building the unanswerable questions regarding why it fell would at least have an explanation that is somewhat plausible. With no plane hitting the building the government was unable to formulate any kind of explanation for the collapse of Building 7. As a result of the government’s inability to come up with even a partially realistic explanation for the collapse of Building 7 it has chosen to deal with this situation by completely erasing it from official history. Building 7 is not even addressed in the Kean Commission report. Therefore it is my suggestion that perhaps part of the plan was to have flight 93 hit this building lending some credence to the notion that the buildings collapsed due to the collisions.

What is quite clear and is NOT theory is the fact that there has been no explanation for the collapse of Building 7 and that its collapse has been erased from reality by our media and by our government. Even the most ignorant among us who blindly accept the official conspiracy theory, with all its omissions, contradictions and right our falsehoods, have to have some doubts when it comes to the collapse of Building 7.

Building 7 collapsing without being hit by any object validates completely the plausibility of the claims made by the independent research community that the main towers did not collapse as a result of the planes hitting them or of the pursuant fires. Of course the destruction of building 7 only proves that it is possible that the towers could have collapsed by means other than the planes and fires since neither a plane nor a significant fire did damage to Building 7 but it collapsed anyway. While the collapse of building 7 simply sets the precedence for the claims that the main towers were taken down by controlled demolition, the volumes of video evidence showing explosions at the base of the WTC prior to the collapse and showing that the towers did not collapse rather they exploded from the top down followed by charges going off in advance of the fall line, surely solidify that claim.

While we do not know for sure what happened that day we do know several things:
1. Members of the Bush administration were in a position to prevent, permit or conduct the events of 9/11/2001 and these same people openly professed how a new Pearl Harbor (which took place on 9/11) would help advance their agenda. As a result, these people turned out to be the greatest beneficiaries of the events of that day.
2. We do know that to date no official explanation has been given for the collapse of Building 7.
3. We do know that our corporate media have ignored every aspect of the collapse of Building 7.
4. We do know that the Bush administration expedited the destruction of all evidence related to the collapses of the towers and of Building 7, which we all know is not only suspisious but it is a crime.

What we do not know is why Building 7 collapsed.

Had Flight 93 slammed into Building 7, then the collapse would have had an official explanation. In essence the official conspiracy theory would be fairly complete. Without explaining this event the official conspiracy theory is invalid. The government’s solution: ignore the event. Our media have ignored it and most of the public have ignored it. However ignoring something does not always make it go away and it it surely does not change reality. The fact that Building 7 collapsed without being damaged by any significant outside forces puts into doubt the entire official explanation for the collapses of towers 1 & 2. That my friends, is a fact. If we are told that Building 7 could collapse without a plane having hit it, why then must we believe that towers 1 & 2 came down as a result of planes hitting them? Can you say “contradiction?” Could the towers have collapsed without planes hitting them or for some other reason as did Building 7?

I suggest that a plane was supposed to hit Building 7 as the cover reason for its collapse. The building was set to come down by controlled demolition which is obvious by the videos of its destruction. The plane was part of the cover story. Somebody slipped up and that last plane was not allowed to reach its target. The government and the media did not have a fall back story to tell the public if the operation did not go exacly as planned so they did the only thing they could have done, they pretend it did not happen. They ignored Building 7 and thanks do the controlled story telling by our media most of the public did not even notice. The corporate media just pretended Building 7 never existed and the public just swallowed the story without even chewing.

Do I know for sure if this theory is true? No; that is why I call it a theory, or better yet it is a reasonable suggestion based on what we know. This is also why I published this on my blog and not on the main site. This is a theory but it a reasonable and plausable theory at that.

Well folks, Building 7 came down and to this day your government did not tell you why and your news media did ask why. What else haven’t they told you?

Think about it!
Peace,
Jesse - Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

RELATED:

  • 9/11-PNAC, 9/11-PNAC - SHOULD BE THE #1 TOPIC OF DISCUSSION: A WAKE-UP CALL THE ALTERNATIVE AND LIBERAL MEDIA: TO STOP IGNORING 9/11 AND THE PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY
  • Larry Silverstein, WTC 7, and the 9/11 Demolition
  • 9/11 – US Complicity: Implausible, or Very Probable? - Questions for the People Who Believe the Official Conspiracy Theory
  • Books on 9/11
  • Videos on 9/11
  • Discuss 9/11
  • WTC 7.net
  • Bill Hemmer, From CNN to FOX - A Perfect Migration

    Wednesday, July 20th, 2005

    For those of you who are regular readers of my newsletter the news of Bill Hemmer being hired by FOX News should be of no surprise. Time and time I have pointed out, specifically, how Hemmer is not even close to being a real journalist. This of course makes him the perfect candidate for the FOX News channel. I should have predicted this. All he needs now is a serious conflict of interest between the issues he covers and his personal life and he will be the perfect FOX News employee!

    Bush’s Appointed Criminals - Am I the Only One Who Noticed?

    Tuesday, July 19th, 2005

    Am I crazy or am I the only one who realizes that George W. Bush has appointed several convicted felons to sensitive positions in our government? Everyone is talking about how he said he will fire Rove if a crime was committed but nobody asked him why he has appointed convicted felons and other people involved in crimes? Take a look around the administration and see how many ex-Iran-Contra criminals you can spot. You can probably make a game out of it at this point!

    Bush Fire Rove? Why? Bush Loves Felons; Just Look All Around Him!

    Monday, July 18th, 2005

    Another one of the uncountable outrageous, criminal, immoral and unethical habits of George W. Bush comes to light while our pathetic, no memory, runaway bride chasing news media pretend to take interest in one of the many the deplorable acts committed by the Bush administration. The act that comes to mind: appointing to office convicted felons and shady characters who have already violated laws and abused their power.

    Along with virtually every deplorable act of the Bush administration, the appointing of Iran Contra era characters, including convicted felons, is a prime example of how the media consistently give George W. Bush a free pass. It is also an example of the criminal mindset of this administration. Everyone is screaming about Bush’s loyalty to Rove even though it is quite clear that Rove was at the very least a player in the CIA leak case, but one careful look around will make you realize that this should be no surprised at all.

    Be they convicted felons such as John Poindexter or Elliot Abrams, or their shady cohorts cohorts, John Negroponte & Otto Reich, criminals are more than welcome in the Bush administration. As a matter of fact, the more sinister your background the higher the person climbs in this administration.

    Did you knows a that just last week, with no mention by our media, a confessed Iran-Contra figure landed a sensitive Pentagon position? Robert Earl, who helped in the failed cover-up of the ’80s scandal, is now chief of staff to Gordon England, acting deputy secretary of Defense. Earl actually told a grand jury that he had destroyed and stolen national security documents, and now he works for the Pentagon! This goes on at a time when we are being told that national security threats are the greatest dangers that Americans face.

    George Bush appoints criminal after criminal to sensitive positions in our government, yet the ignorant red state lemmings continue to wave their flags and worship this criminal ring leader!

    Treason? Been there, done that. What’s the big deal if Rove, Cheney or Libby committed acts of treason? Treason is petty compared to the collective rap sheet of the Bush administration.

    What we have here is an administration that is built on a foundation of shady characters and known criminals. There is a ridiculous number of major players in this administration with at least one major skeleton in his or her past. In essence, you have an administration who, based on past history, screams out to be scrutinized, but that under no circumstances deserve the benefit of the doubt when wrongdoing is suspected. They have already violated our trust yet America and our failed media still trusts them.

    Wake up America. We are being ruled by the Who’s Who of criminals in politics. The Bush administration is the political criminal all-star team. These guys make Nixon’s gang look like the Little Rascals. Then again, some of Nixon’s gang are back in office; Karl Rove to mention one. What a surprise?

    Here is a hint for you scandal seekers, try looking into fixed elections, 9/11 complicity, lying a nation into invading and destroying another nation or just pick a topic and look hard enough. Anywhere you look you’ll find a jackpot of scandals. Stop pretending that this leak thing is a big story. It’s standard operating procedure for the PNAC members who have taken over our government by coup d’etat, and have strengthened their grasp on illegitimate power thanks to their new Pearl Harbor on 9/11/2001.

    Rove is just a distraction. The leak is being treated as if it were an exception to the rule when in fact it is simply just another brick in the wall.

    Who to Trust on TV? Nobody!

    Monday, July 18th, 2005

    It is one thing for a government to try to get news or educational organizations to produce films that appear to be the work of those institutions yet are scripted propaganda pieces for the government. It is another thing for those institutions to go ahead and do it. We have found out about the many propaganda pieces disguised as news stories that were produced by the Bush administration and run on news programs, but now we find out that even the Weather Channel is involved. What next? At this point I would be suspect of Barney Rubble or Bugs Bunny! Who can we trust at this point? Think about it!

    Bush/PNAC Iraq Lie Bombshell…If It’s True…

    Sunday, July 17th, 2005

    If, and I repeat “if” the story about the Bush/PNAC administration planning to covertly affect the outcome of the elections in Iraq is true, it proves that this administration has lied virtually every single day since it announced its intentions for Iraq. Every comment about democracy and free elections would have been a lie if they intended on weighing in on the elections.

    It is important to note that intent here is the issue, so even if their plans were never implemented it still proves that their intentions did not match their words. There is no excuse for planning any kind of involvement in the Iraqi elections if the administration’s public position on Iraq was true.

    Here we have another bombshell expose of the lying criminals in the White House, and the lemming red state lemmings still refuse to take notice.

    How many outrageous crimes and lies must come to light before America takes notice? Didn’t America learn anything from the lessons of Hitler?

    Now consider this…if you were an Iraqi whose family members were killed as a result of the invasion, and you learn that after all of the rhetoric the Bush/PNAC administration was going to do what American government has done for a century, interfere with the internal politics of an Arab nation, how would you feel? Think about it!


    Bad Behavior has blocked 633 access attempts in the last 7 days.