Archive for November, 2005

Hey Chris Mathews…You are a Lying Bastard Too!

Wednesday, November 9th, 2005

Last night MSNBC’s Chris Mathews was talking with Tucker Carlson and Ron Reagan Jr. They were almost laughing about the fact that at the start of the Iraq invasion 70% of America thought that there were Iraqi nationals on the list of 19 alleged hijackers on 9/11. They also laughed at the fact that at the time of the 2004 election 70% of America believed that WMD have been found in Iraq.

They acted surprised that people believed this and they seemed to point the blame at the Bush administration. Well guess what - 100% of that 70% get their information from the corporate media, not from the Bush administration! Guess what Chris - that’s you!

Hey Mr. Mathews - although you are trying to act like you are a journalist these days you are not fooling me. I watched you take part in the deception. Everyone watched you lie for 5 years. So I’ll tell you what will come on your program and talk about the 70% of America who were either stupid or duped. I’ll talk about your role in misinforming that 70%. Then we’ll see how giggle-worthy the facts are? I’ll bring some bleach so that you can try to wash some of the blood stains off of your hands - but I doubt history will let you do the same. I’ll be waiting for your invitation :-) Think about it!

Cheney’s Energy Meetings, Iraq Oil & 9/11 - A TVNL Reminder

Tuesday, November 8th, 2005

From the day I created I have claimed that the truth behind both 9/11 and the invasion of Iraq can be found by investigating Dick Cheney’s secret energy policy meetings. Judicial Watch was successful in forcing Cheney, by way of lawsuit, to disclose the fact that maps of Iraqi oil fields and energy infrastructure were included in the meeting documentation.

The common sense question is this: How could Cheney include Iraq’s oil resources as part of our energy policy if we had no diplomatic or business relationship with them? Iraq was under sanctions. What business did Cheney have with Iraq’s energy infrastructure? No dealings with Iraq were possible unless something drastic were to happen, like an invasion and occupation. How could he have anticipated such a change when only an event like 9/11 would have made that possible?

Why did Cheney’s maps include the entire energy infrastructure? Could it be because his pals, the energy industry profiteers who attended the meeting had something to gain financially when it came time to rebuilding the Iraqi energy infrastructure after Cheney’s military war profiteers destroyed it?

The invasion of Iraq was a jackpot for the war profiteers who destroyed Iraq and for the post war profiteers who rebuilt Iraq. And let’s not forget about the oil companies who will now make money on oil that used to belong to the people of Iraq and has now been parceled out to the thieves by the conquerors of Iraq’s resources. (You can scream all you want about how Saddam used his oil money for his palaces and for his personal use but he also provided, with that oil money, free health care, free education through college and an industrialized Iraq for his people! Where does American oil money go? How’s your medical coverage these days?)

Again we submit clear evidence that Dick Cheney, a PNAC member, had motives for conducting, enabling or permitting the events of 9/11 to take place and he was in a position to carry it out. And by virtue of the facts that Iraq’s resources were included in his planning, it indicates that Dick Cheney was actually anticipating those events.

Illuminati, Skull & Bones - Our Real Government?

Monday, November 7th, 2005

November 7, 2005 - 12:00 Noon ET - Topic: Illuminati, Skull & Bones - Our Real Government?

Live: Call in number: 317-776-4130 - AOL IM: tvnewslies
Monks Media Radio Network

What are secret societies? What role do they play in our world? Why do members of organizations like Skull & Bones, Council on Foreign Relations & the Freemasons dominate the powerful leadership positions in our society? What are these groups? Why do they exist? Who funds them?

What role does religion play in all of this?


  • Curtis Dall - FDR’s Son-in-law: “For a long time I had thought that FDR had developed many thoughts that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But he didn’t. Most of his thoughts were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the Council on Foreign Relations One-World Money Group.”
  • FDR, 1933: “The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial eleme
    nt in the large centers has owned Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
  • Barry Goldwater: “The Trilateral Commission is intended to be a vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States…They will rule the future.”
  • David Rockefeller - Founder of the Trilateral Commission: 1991 “We are greatful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of descression for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the work is now much more sophisicated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the auto determination practiced in past centureies”.
  • Henry Kissinger - 1991: “Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened their very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
  • What do these comments mean to you? How do they make you feel? They are actual verifiable comments. Intersting, don’t you think?

    Todays guests are:

  • Anthony J. Hilder - Documentary Filmmaker. Illuminati Expert. Films include “9/11, The Greatest Lie Ever Sold” - “Illiminazi 9-11” & “Illuminati, All Conspiracy, No Theory!.”
  • Kris Millegan - Author of Fleshing Out Skull & Bones - Skull and Bones, the pirates flag, a poison warning—an icon of death—an interesting symbol for what some say is merely a Yale ‘frat’ club. Just some college kids and their bizarre hazing humor—having fun. - For almost 170 years that grimacing visage and code of “strict secrecy”
  • Reference:

    9/11, Iraq & PNAC - The Connection is Clear & Undeniable

    Monday, November 7th, 2005


    With all the recent questions being asked about the lies that led us to war one question is still being ignored: what does 9/11 have to do with the US invasion of Iraq? The answer is not what you have been told; the illogical claim that 9/11 changed everything and it caused the US to change the way they dealt with potential threats. The real connection here is that 9/11 gave the men who wanted to invade Iraq so badly that they lied to the world in order to do it, the political and popular support to go ahead with their radical agenda.

    The one question that becomes more relevant, less controversial and more important as the lies that led us to war are brought to light is this: who benefited from the events of 9/11 and how did they benefit?

    Just as the members of the Project for a New American Century stated in their manifesto they needed a new Pearl Harbor in order to get the popular support for their radical agenda and they got that new Pearl Harbor on 9/11/2001. Imagine that; the very men who were in positions to prevent, permit or conduct the attacks of 9/11/2001 were the very people who had their wish granted at the moment the first plane hit the WTC.

    Another obvious benefit of 9/11 is the open ended financial jackpot delivered to the military industrial complex and to the energy industry; both of which are interwoven with the members of the Bush/PNAC administration. These people have received untold and virtually unlimited financial profits as a result of the events of 9/11. The independent researchers have uncovered mountains of evidence indicating inside (American) complicity in the events of 9/11 yet many people refuse to believe them based on one premise; they refuse to believe that Americans would hurt other Americans. If this were true we would not need prisons. We would not have a Mafia. Greed alone has been the driving force that has caused man to kill man on a massive scale. Greed has been the driving force behind the murders of spouses, children, parents and total strangers. What makes you think that greed alone is not a good enough reason for war profiteers, who as a livelihood deal in death, to sacrifice a few thousand strangers so that they can reap unlimited fortune? That alone could alone serve as motive for taking part in the horrific events of 9/11/2001.

    Nothing corrupts the human soul more than greed, but greed was not the only potential motivating factor for conducting such an event. The Project for a New American Century’s entire reason for being hinged on such an event. A huge part of that agenda was the invasion of Iraq. The invasion of Iraq was made possible only by the events of 9/11. To date we have not even heard a theory put forth on how Muslim extremists have, or would have benefited from those events. They had nothing to gain and from what we have witnessed as the world turned against the Muslim people, they had everything to lose. We have seen a great deal of “EVIDENCE” indicating, at the very least that many actions were taken by operatives within the Bush/PNAC administration to paralyze procedures that were in place to prevent and/or address an attack of that nature. Even more “EVIDENCE” has been uncovered that indicates a far greater level of involvement by insiders.

    What we have here is a group of men (PNAC) who had a plan. The plan included invading Iraq. They openly admitted that this would not be possible without an event like 9/11. (They used the term “new Pearl Harbor” but you can obviously see the connection.) They were in key positions to ensure that events of 9/11 take place, either by conducting them or by permitting them to play out. Now they are being exposed for the lies they told about Iraq that permitted them to invade a nation and kill 10s if not 100s of thousands of people including 2000 Americans.


    I ask all people to examine the motive/benefit/evidence links between the events of 9/11 and the members of the Bush administration who were involved with the Project for a New American Century. These links become more defined and understandable as each lie related to the invasion of Iraq is exposed. Think about it


    Covering Bush Protests; Why Start Now?

    Sunday, November 6th, 2005

    Did you see the coverage of the protests against George W. Bush in Argentina? Why was there more coverage this protest against Bush than there was of all the protests against him globally, combined? George. W. Bush is arguably the most protested figure in human history so why all of a sudden did we see extended coverage of this now? I attended at least 3 protests where there were so many participants that you could not see where the crowd ended with your eyes, you needed binoculars! Yet these massive protests were hardly mentioned by our media even the one was so large that the NYC Lexington Avenue subway system had to be shut down due to over capacity. Keep that in mind the next time you hear on the news how many people the use the NYC subway each day.

    As I said before, someone let the dogs loose on the Bush administration. Someone allowed reality to be exposed for the first time on 5 years. Who is allowing this and why? What changed and who changed it? Keep in mind there is nothing new going on…this is mostly old news. Protests are nothing new when it comes to Bush; showing the American public the protests however, is very new. Nothing has changed except the coverage. Think about it!

    Political Sins - Dems Endulge, Repubs Kill

    Saturday, November 5th, 2005

    Let’s give some credit to the folks at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. They did not put up with the political hack that had recently been appointed to lead them. The purpose of the appointment was to make sure public broadcasting shifted their content from accurate information to more conservative political & social content. Well that did not last long. It actually has given me a little hope for the future of broadcast news and information.

    It also did not take this Republican political hack to get into trouble. He is already under investigation. That didn’t take too long! How dirty can the GOP get? Let’s face it, both Democrats and Republicans in office are criminals but at least when a Democrat is breaking laws or acting unethically it usually is for personal gain (or pleasure), nobody actually gets hurt (in the literal sense) or killed and for the most part it does not weaken the nation. The same can not be said about Republican wrongdoings. Think about it!

    Bill Maher & Tony Snow Continue the Saddam Lies

    Friday, November 4th, 2005

    Bill Maher helped FOX News’ Tony Snow continue to lie to the public about Iraq. On Maher’s HBO show Tony Snow stated that women in Iraq are now permitted to attend college and they were not allowed to do so under Saddam. This is a lie and Maher let him get away with it. Women had equal rights under the Law when Saddam was in power. Women were permitted to attend college and hold any job that a man could hold including positions in government. They were not subject to Islamic laws that treat women like possessions owned and ruled by men. Another little tidbit that Snow left out was that a college education in Iraq was FREE and it was funded by oil money. Where do American oil profits go? Saddam may have been a tyrant, but there is more to the picture than the good and evil image that has been painted for us by the media. Think about it!

    Confessions Welcomed.

    Thursday, November 3rd, 2005

    Do you really think that it is possible that the entire corporate media apparatus was not aware of the information that our website made available to the public? Do you think that had some special top secret information source that was not even know to the NY Times, 60 Minutes or CNN?

    If you do not believe that has some secret source of information then don’t accept the claim that the corporate news entities were “duped” by the Bush/PNAC administration. They had the same information as we did and they could have come to the same conclusions that we did. Actually we did not need to conclude much because we simply knew the truth. Nothing much to figure out here, especially when it came to Iraq.

    So don’t fall for phony apologies with sympathetic claims that the Bush/PNAC administration duped everyone. The only thing you should accept is a confession of guilt. They lied. It’s as simple as that. There is no reason to accept an apology for the lies that have been told but it would be nice if they finally admitted their crimes. Think about it! – Jesse, Editor,

    ON ANOTHER NOTE: Keep an eye on Bush’s visit the South America. I have a strange feeling that there may be some newsworthy events taking place down there. The fact that the security team came down with food poisoning may not be a coincidence. Just being paranoid!


    Wednesday, November 2nd, 2005

    This is the only NY Times front page that will accept. We want the media, starting with the Times, to admit that they lied. They were not fooled…they lied.

    They were not duped about any issue. Not about 9/11, Iraq, stolen elections, global warming or the CIA leak. The media knew about everything. We have been reporting this for years. If anyone was duped it was the public and the dupers were the media…starting with the NY Times.

    Click here to download full size image.'s NY Times Front Page

    Nice Try Harry (Reid) But it Was Too Little, Too Late

    Wednesday, November 2nd, 2005

    Give me a break Harry Reid! NOW you ask about the evidence presented to the world related to Iraq? Why not ask this on the same day that it was announced in the UN in front of Colin Powel, that the evidence related to Niger were FORGERIES? Remember these words?:

    ElBaradei’s U.N. presentation Friday, March 7, 2003: “Based on thorough analysis, the IAEA has concluded with the concurrence of outside experts that these documents which formed the basis for the report of recent uranium transaction between Iraq and Niger are in fact not authentic. We have therefore concluded that these specific allegations are unfounded. However, we will continue to follow up any additional evidence if it emerges relevant to efforts by Iraq to illicitly import nuclear materials.”

    Now you are asking questions AFTER your Congress signed the OK to obliterate Iraq? Hey Harry…do you remember the 130 nations in the UN General Assembly that ALL voted against an invasion of Iraq? Were they fooled? Either you and your pals in Congress are completely incompetent idiots or your are lying bastard criminals. What do I think? - let’s just say I don’t think you are idiots.

    You still haven’t even looked at the New Pearl Harbor gang’s (PNAC members in the White House) connections to 9/11 so why should we expect anything more from you when it comes to Iraq? If you were a doctor you would probably need to go to the cemetery so that you can dig up the patients you finally decide to treat. Nice try with your little closed door session; I am sure many Democrats fell for it - but the clich  “too little, too late” is an understatement in this case! Think about it!

    Bad Behavior has blocked 228 access attempts in the last 7 days.