Archive for April, 2006

Iraq: Bush & PNAC Have Lit the Fuse

Saturday, April 29th, 2006

Whatever position you take in regards to the invasion of Iraq there is one clear fact that can not be debated. In the same way that one would release potential energy from a stick of dynamite by lighting its fuse the Bush/PNAC administration has lit a fuse in Iraq releasing its catastrophic potential.

Saddam Hussein’s Iraq was in a sense a stick of dynamite, or more accurately a bundle of dynamite sticks. Saddam personally was responsible for preventing many of the fuses from being lit. He kept many of these fuses dry by using brutal tactics however.

Enter the Bush/PNAC administration with their torch of freedom. They stormed into Iraq lighting fuse after fuse. We stand now watching the fireworks show brought to you by the actions of the Bush/PNAC administration.

One has to wonder if the actual goal of their operation was to light these fuses. It seems as if they did everything in their power to light each fuse and they did everything in their power to prevent anyone or anything from doing anything to keep the fuses dry. Now they have their excuse for keeping military presence in Iraq and they have their excuse for keeping the river of no-bid contract $billions flowing into their friends pockets.

This administration seems to have set a clear pattern where they get to do things that nobody would ever agree to only because of the existence of excuses of their own making. From 9/11 to the self manufactured instability in Iraq a trail of Bush/PNAC administration manufactured excuses pave the only possible path for their otherwise unacceptable agenda. Think about it!

Osama Connected to 9/11? Not According to the F.B.I.

Friday, April 28th, 2006

NOTE: TvNewsLIES.org new home page is linked here.

If you take a minute to visit the F.B.I. website and check out their Most Wanted list, you will run across a familiar face; Osama bin Laden. Of course we know that Osama is wanted by the F.B.I. but did you know he is NOT wanted in connection to the events of September 11th 2001?

As of today, 4/28/06, the F.B.I. website listing for Osama notes that it was last updated in November, 2001, after the events of September 11th 2001. While the site notes several crimes for which Osama is suspected, the site makes no mention of the events of September 11th.

Quote from the F.B.I. listing (copied on 4/28/2006):

USAMA BIN LADEN IS WANTED IN CONNECTION WITH THE AUGUST 7, 1998, BOMBINGS OF THE UNITED STATES EMBASSIES IN DAR ES SALAAM, TANZANIA, AND NAIROBI, KENYA. THESE ATTACKS KILLED OVER 200 PEOPLE. IN ADDITION, BIN LADEN IS A SUSPECT IN OTHER TERRORIST ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.

I find it very interesting that the F.B.I. sees no direct connection between bin Laden and the events of September 11th. Don’t you? Maybe they know something that we don’t know about the events! Think about it!

Wondering About This Crazy Weather?

Thursday, April 27th, 2006

One of the goals outlined in the Project for a New American Century’s plan to rebuild America’s defense apparatus is to completely dominate space. Well maybe this will give you something to think about when you combine the facts that PNAC is proceeding with their agenda and they are currently in charge of our White House with the interesting recent weather patterns we have been experiencing.

In a speech to Congress Lyndon B. Johnson’s made a statement proclaiming that our very future depended on being the ones who first seized ownership of space. “Control of space means control of the world,” Johnson declared.

“From space, the masters of infinity would have the power to control the earth’s weather, to cause drought and flood, to change the tides and raise the levels of the sea, to divert the gulf stream and change temperate climates to frigid.”

We really have to start linking current events to past proclamations of our leaders for they may shed light on the real history of their beginnings. Think about it!

About Tony Snow – What You Don’t Know – Can You Say Council on Foreign Relations?

Wednesday, April 26th, 2006

For those of you who continue to dismiss the notion that the U.S. government is not exactly what it appears to be and that the U.S. is controlled by people and bodies outside the officially accepted governmental body, the appointment of Tony Snow to White House Press Secretary should serve as an example of this not so hidden power behind the scenes.

Tony Snow is a well known “journalist” for the FOX News Channel. But did you know that he is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)?  Did you know he has no education in journalism? Tony graduated with a Batchelor of Arts degree and he studied among other things philosophy, an interesting line of study for someone who supposedly practices journalism; a field in which opinion and philosophy (should) play no role.

Fitting into the recent tradition of journalistic conflicts of interests by our corporate media Tony Snow served as a speechwriter for President George H. W. Bush.

While everyone is focusing on the implications of Snow’s appointment as it relates to the Bush administration’s cozy little relationship with their PR firm known as the FOX News Channel, you should really be focusing on the cozy little relationships between the CFR and the corporate media and between the CFR and our government. The CFR is in fact a secret society. Well, at least it is run like it is a secret society. Just check out their membership rules. You can not apply for a job there. Their membership rules are similar to those of the Skull and Bones secret society, although the initiation rituals may greatly differ.

Who funds the CFR? Why is it so influential? Why has its members been drawn from media outlets and governmental institutions?
While it may appear that it draws its members from these institutions a more accurate way of describing the proliferation of CFR members in the media and in government is to say that the CFR has operatives scattered among the institutions of government and media. Why? Who is behind this? Who funds this? Who permits this?

When a journalist is a member of an organization that is involved in the political processes of our nation that journalist is no longer fair, balanced or unbiased. Inside players can not act as outside observers. Journalists are not supposed to be inside players.

Groups like the Council on Foreign Relations must not be allowed to continue to infiltrate our institutions of democracy. There must be full disclosure and transparency where groups like this are involved. Those of you who think this is simply paranoia need to start researching this on your own. The closer you look the more alarmed you will become and the picture of the real power behind our government will become disturbingly clear to you. Think about it!

An Unqualified Decider In Chief

Tuesday, April 25th, 2006

Let us for a moment pretend that George W. Bush, or any American president for that matter, actually makes decisions for this nation. Let’s pretend that American presidents are not selected for us and instructed as to what agenda to carry out by organizations like the mysterious Bilderberg group, the Council on Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission. Let’s pretend that George W. Bush, an intellectual imbecile, is actually making decisions that affect our nation.

I ask this one question regarding George W. Bush and his decision making: How is this man qualified to make decisions on issues that he had no knowledge of prior to his appointment to the office of president? This man had no understanding of world affairs, history, culture, war, combat, veteran’s issues, science, the environment, human rights or geography. As a matter of fact George W. Bush is most likely the shallowest and most uninformed individual to ever inhabit the White House yet people trust him to be the “decider” on issues of global importance? A man that knows nothing about science being a decider on issues of global warming. A man who knows nothing about history or other cultures is making decisions related to the structure of five thousand year old cultures. A man who never stepped foot on a battle field making decision on wars that will last for generations.

Why is there no competency test for people who hold office in this nation? Are we really foolish enough to believe that “likeability” is the only quality required in order to lead a nation? Well, if I were to be the decider of this issue I would set some serous standards and requirement for future deciders in chief and I’d bet the ranch that George W. Bush would not meet a single one of my standards. Think about it!

McLaughlin’s Corporate Medicine Infomercial

Sunday, April 23rd, 2006

On the McLaughlin Group program today the topic was the rising cost of health care. On this program which has as its sponsors Kaiser Permanente (health insurance company) and Pfizer (a pharmaceutical company), had representatives from both these companies on to tell the American people why health costs are rising. The conclusion these industry profiteers came too: Americans don’t take care of themselves.

Missing from this panel, anyone who represents the patients or anyone from a health cost watchdog group. Also missing from this panel: anyone who represents organizations who monitor environmental and food chain related toxins, additives or genetically modified food stuff.

McLaughlin chose to replace his usual panelists with these medical profiteers who also happen to be sponsors of his program. This program was clearly an infomercial masquerading as an open discussion of the issues.

It may also interest you that much like the other Sunday morning “fake news” programs the McLaughlin sponsors include chemical companies that for some reason sponsor “news” programs even though they get no benefit from direct to the consumer advertising.
The Sunday morning “news” programs are clearly the propaganda tools of their sponsors and today’s McLaughlin Group episode/infomericals is perhaps the most perfect example of this blatant form of media deception. Think about it!

It Happened Under Hitler Too

Friday, April 21st, 2006

When I first learned about WWII and how Hitler did things like rounding up and killing people based on ethnicity, I asked the common sense question that any free thinking individual would ask: how did the people of Germany let this happen and why did the Jewish people (for example) allow themselves to be rounded up?
I wonder if free thinkers are asking similar questions about George W. Bush’s America. I wonder if a free thinker would ask how Americans permitted themselves to have their first amendment rights eliminated, without legal authority, by letting themselves get rounded up into free speech zones. I know this is not exactly what Hitler did, but it is not exactly that much different either.

This little sign of things to come started happening as soon as the Bush/PNAC administration took office. There was no 9/11, no Iraq and no war on terrorism yet we sat silently as the newly appointed administration started doing away with our Constitutional rights.

There were signs of things to come from the very inception of the George W. Bush presidential campaign. But the moment the open conduct of the newly appointed president mirrored that of a dictator we should have done something to protect our Constitution and our rights.

Never again will an American be able to comment on the notion that Germans should have seen the signs and should have stopped Hitler before he proceeded with his desires to rule the world without taking pause to ask why Americans did not see the signs when their own dictatorship was taking form. Think about it!

When I Realized There Was More to the Story

Thursday, April 20th, 2006

When I was a child, I really thought there was a tooth fairy. I would show my parents the coins that were left under my pillow, not knowing that my parents were themselves tooth fairies! When I realized that my parents were the people behind my belief system the world did not change; only my perception and understanding of the world changed.

When I was a child, I thought that a man named Lee Harvey Oswald, for some reason, took it upon himself to kill President John F. Kennedy. When I found out that there was more to the story than what I had read in the book on my parents’ shelf (Four Days), the world did not change; only my perception and understanding of the world changed.

When I was told that Saddam Hussein sent his troops into Kuwait for what appeared to be no other reason than to start his plan to rule the world, I cheered for George H. W. Bush. When I later learned that the U.S. had screwed Saddam in the past by selling weapons to his enemy while we proclaimed our support for him by selling weapons to him, the world did not change. And when I found out that the reason that Saddam invaded Kuwait was because they were stealing Iraq’s oil with the help of the British and that the US officially took a neutral position when Saddam asked for help, the world did not change. When I found out that the stories told to Congress and the American people about the atrocities being committed by Saddam’s troops in Iraq were a set of lies created by a P.R. firm that was hired by George H. W. Bush to sell the war to Congress, the world did not change. Only my perception and understanding of the world changed.

So when our nation underwent two fraudulent presidential elections and three fraudulent midterm elections, and when the events of September 11th took place, my perception of the world did not need to change much for me to realize that there was probably more to the story than we were told. As time passed and information became available about those events, I realized that I was correct. There was more to the story, only this time my perception did not have to change. The only thing that changed was that this time I did not foolishly believe the first thing that I was told.

So I ask you…what is your perception of the world? Do you still believe that the US is a democratic republic? Do you still believe that the Federal Reserve is part of our government and that the United States is not in fact fully owned by that private group of international bankers? Do you still believe that Congress represents the people of the U.S.? Do you still believe that there is no power beyond the façade of the U.S. government with an agenda designed to create one world government where the ruling elite control everything?

Just keep this in mind: when you finally realize that the world is not what it appears to be, nothing will change. Only your understanding of reality will change. The only way that we can indeed change the world is if everyone quickly changed his or her perception and understanding of the world! We are running out of time. Would you rather be in a position to say, “They tried to warn me and I didn’t listen,” or would you rather be in a position to say, “We did it; we woke up our fellow citizens!” Think about it!

Sore/Strep Throat? Try this!

Wednesday, April 19th, 2006

For those of you who live through the Bush/PNAC policy of global population reduction you may want to stock up on some grapefruit seed extract. It is an amazing anti-biotic and as long as you do not put it in your eyes it is 100% safe.

I had a bottle of this stuff in my cabinet for years but I pulled it out yesterday to give to someone who was suffering from strep throat. She had gone to the doctor and came back with 2 prescriptions. One was for a powerful anti-biotic called Azithromycin and the other was for a numbing agent called Lidocaine (the stuff the dentist injects to numb you before performing dental work).

Well, she took the antibiotic but she was still in pain. The Lidocaine had not reduced the pain at all. At this point the pain was so bad that she described it as feeling like she had swallowed shards of glass! Well, I prepared a mixture of about 6 ounces of water, a spoonful of iced tea mix and about 15 drops of grapefruit seed extract. After complaining about the terribly bitter taste it only took about 5 minutes before the bitter taste became worth putting up with. The pain diminished to about 50% of its original level.  She took the mixture two more times that day only the concentration was reduced to 10 drops each (the taste was too bitter in the stronger solution). With each dose the pain was reduced significantly within minutes. By the next morning the pain was all gone. Have you ever heard of a case where the pain from strep throat vanished within 12-15 hours of being treated by anything, even the most powerful antibiotic?

I am not saying that you should not visit a doctor or take prescribed antibiotics when you are sick, especially when something as potentially serious as a strep related bacterial infection in concerned. But I do recommend keeping some of this stuff in the house to use it in conjunction with prescribed medicine.

It has many other uses too, both for your health and for general sanitary germ killing purposes (cleaning tooth brushes, adding to soap, using in vaporizers). It is safe, natural and inexpensive. If you travel to places that may not have the cleanest water you can use a few drops of this stuff to kill the bacteria. I used it to battle Candida years ago and I found it to be more effective than the expensive antifungal medication that was prescribed to me.

Anyway, I thought I would share this tip. If we listen to what the pharmaceutical companies tell us you would wonder how the human species survived without them. Well, I think nature has a lot to offer. So before they make fruit seeds illegal in this country, pick up some of this stuff. Try it out and think of me every time your face wrinkles up after tasting this little bitter health miracle! Think about it!

ENOUGH with the “Discredit” Argument

Tuesday, April 18th, 2006

I find it quite unbelievable that so many people feel that they can simply “discredit” an article or a source for pretty much any reason they want. It cracks me up when someone finds a typo, or a minor factual error somewhere on a 500 page web site and uses that as a reason to discredit one of my articles or me personally.

If you were dying and a doctor operated on you to save your life, would you discredit him/her if he/she charted your weight incorrectly by adding a zero or two? Would you now be dead because your weight was written down incorrectly or because your doctor chose to write with a crayon?

These self declared authorities never take the time to correct my errors or ask me to clarify my point. They simply discredit my entire body of work. Some people have even been so stupid as to question my credibility because of the design I chose for my website. Because they feel that the design of my web site is not professional enough for them they take it upon themselves to declare that I am not a credible person. I would like to take a moment to call these illogical people idiots. I have other thoughts about these people but I’ll leave it at that.

I am not an artist. I am not a graphic designer or a web marketing expert. I still have problems spelling my own name and I have mild dyslexia. My mother still helps me with spelling even the simplest of words. I make other mistakes too. I also have an open disclaimer on my site where I open myself to input from people who can help correct me when I am less that accurate.

That being said I will also say this…to date I have yet to find a single individual, organization or institution that has analyzed media deception as accurately as I have. I spot deception that nobody else seems to find and that is a fact. Many of my observations have surprised and impressed many of the established icons of media analysis and I am now a respected player in the world of media watchdogs.

I know this newsletter is more of verbal patting of my own back, but there is an underlying point for everyone here. The use of the “discredit” argument has to be ended. A valid point, article, opinion, discovery, invention, observation or contribution of any kind must always be evaluated on its own merit. The use of the “discredit” argument is most often used by people who can not otherwise find fault with something or someone with whom they disagree. It is the old story about shooting the messenger if you can not defeat the message. Well someone has to say this once and for all; if the message is valid the envelope is not relevant and the messenger’s imperfections are not necessarily relevant.

Evaluate the message. If you find fault in that message, correct it and contact the messenger. You will quickly discover how credible the messenger is by the response you get. Simple little formula for evaluating credibility; wouldn’t you say? Think about it!


Bad Behavior has blocked 776 access attempts in the last 7 days.