Archive for September, 2006

Meet the Official White House 9/11 Myth Maker: Philip D. Zelikow

Tuesday, September 12th, 2006

On September 10th I was one of the guest speakers at a 9/11 truth event at Cooper Union in New York (sponsored by Les Jameson’s ny911truth.org). There were many esteemed speakers that day who shared a great deal of information related to the events of September11th 2001 but no information was more stunning than the little tidbit brought to light about the Executive Director of the famous Kean Commission, Philip D. Zelikow.

Think hard about what you would look for if you were to appoint a director of an investigation into the events of 9/11. Would you look for someone who has studied or even dabbled in the creation and maintenance of public myths? Would you search for or even consider placing someone in charge of that committee whose area of academic expertise is the creation and maintenance of, in his words, “public myths” or “public presumptions”, which he defines as “beliefs thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and shared in common within the relevant political community.” Well that is exactly what happened!

Do a little research on Philip D. Zelikow, the Executive Director of the Kean Commission and you will find that his area of expertise is precisely suited for people who have a story that is not necessarily known to be true, but want the public to accept it as such. Add that to your 110 story high pile of coincidences that comprise the official story! Think about it

Democrats: The 9/11 Johnnies Come Lately!

Friday, September 8th, 2006

For five long and frustrating years the people in the 9/11 research community have asked, no they begged the big powerful democratic organizations to use their power and access to large numbers of people to focus attention on the issues surrounding September 11th, 2001. I personally confronted Amy Goodman, the so called hero of the Democrats, about her ignoring the most incriminating EVIDENCE related to 9/11 and the Bush administration. I personally tried to influence Moveon.org, International A.N.S.W.E.R., and United for Peace and Justice to march their people down to the media outlets instead of herding the Democratic sheeple to empty buildings on deserted streets in Washington D.C. for the purpose of yelling at the criminals. Talk about wasting time. Talk about making people think they are activists while they accomplish absolutely nothing!

Now some right wing propagandist has pointed a finger at the Pope of Democrat Village, Bill Clinton. And guess what - these Democratic organizations are suddenly interested in 9/11! I have received dozens of e-mail from these organizations asking me to pressure ABC to cancel the propaganda piece on 9/11. Well, where were these e-mails during the past five years of surreal coverage of the events by the media?Where were the dozens of e-mail asking me to pressure ABC to air Barrie Zwicker’s “The Great Conspiracy, the 9/11 News Special You Never Saw”?  Where were the e-mails asking me to tell ABC to air documentaries by Michael Ruppert, Dylan Avery, Eric Hufschmid, Jimmy Walter or Alex Jones (to name a few)?

Now the Democrats come to life to protect Bill Clinton? Where were they when we asked them to help protect the truth? They spent five years ignoring the fact that we have an illegitimate administration who seized control of our nation via electoral coup and who very possibly committed the crimes that took place on September 11th, 2001.

My advice to these Johnny come lately Democrats is to shut up because this propaganda piece is exactly what you deserve. You refused to help us expose the truth and now you are paying the price. Think about it!

So When Do We Bomb Pakistan?

Wednesday, September 6th, 2006

We have heard in time and time again. George W. Bush has threatened all terrorists and all nations that support or provide sanctuary to these so called terrorists. We watched as Bush and company obliterated Iraq even though they did not meet this stated criteria. But now we have a nation that clearly meets that criteria: Pakistan. They have reached a peace agreement with the Taliban and they now claim that they will not arrest Osama bin Laden if he leads a peaceful existence in their nation. OK Bush…when does the bombing start? OK Bush supporters, when are you going to sign up for military service to go after this appeaser of our enemies? Think about it!

When is 2nd Place More Important Than 1st Place? When it Comes to al Qaeda!

Tuesday, September 5th, 2006

Bush administration officials, from George W. Bush, to Condoleezza Rice to every right wing mouth piece (and gutter mouth…can you say Ann Coulter?), has told us that Osama bin Laden is no longer a main focus of our war on Terror. Imagine that…they tell us that he is responsible for the attacks of 9/11 and then they say he is not an issue. OK, let’s follow their skewed logic (or cover up for the real facts about 9/11 and the role Osama bin Laden plays in the world), and let us for one minute believe what the Bush administration tells us when they say Osama bin laden is not a factor in the war on terror. Well then why the hell do the keep announcing the arrests or murders of whoever happens to be to be the number two al Qaeda man?

If number one is a non-factor then why the hell is number two so damn important?

How stupid has this world become? How much can we fall for before our brains can not take it anymore and simply jump out of our skulls? We keep falling for this fake or hyped global state of terror and no matter how stupid the claims of the Bush administration become we keep convincing ourselves that we should believe them. Well, at least some of us can see that we are victims of a grand distraction.

Then again maybe the Bush administration is right and bin Laden is a non-factor here; because perhaps they themselves are the real number one! Think about it!

Why No TVNL Election Race Coverage?

Friday, September 1st, 2006

I am sure many people wonder why I do not post any election race news items on the TVNL news page. Well I have a well founded reason for not doing so; it is not real news.

If I were to ignore the illegitimacy of our election process and pretend that polls were actual reflections of public opinion I would be lying to you. We do not elect our officials any more for the most part. Decisions about who may even run for office are made by people other than the voting public. Presidential candidates must be approved by the Council on Foreign Relationsm, not by the voting public (can you say “Howard Dean?”), and we have a rigged computerized voting system.

So if I report news about who is leading in a poll I would be pretending that the system was legitimate. It is not; but my reporting is. To report election news without ensuring the legitimacy of our electoral process would be nothing more than a deception.  Think about it!


Bad Behavior has blocked 638 access attempts in the last 7 days.