Archive for May, 2007

The Infamous “al Qaeda Linked” Terrorists = 6 Degrees of Kevin Bacon

Monday, May 28th, 2007

If the Bush administration and the establishment media had their way, every American would think of the famous rock star of the 60’s, Chubby Checker (of “the Twist” fame), any time anyone mentioned Kevin Bacon’s name. That’s right, the Bush administration and the US media would describe Kevin Bacon as “linked to Chubby Checker” because Chubby Checker was in the movie “Purple People Eater” with Dustin Diamond who was in the TV show “Saved by the Bell: The New Class”, with Michal Worth, who was in the movie “Acapulco H.E.A.T.”, with John Veron, who was in the movie “Animal House” with none other than Kevin Bacon. The link can not be denied. The link is clear and as Dick Cheney would say. “pretty much confirmed!”

Now many of you know that the “Kevin Bacon equation of association”, or as I like to call it A=KB-6, (Association = Kevin Bacon 6 times removed), comes from the grassroots phenomenon known as Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon. It is a trivia game where someone names an actor and the players have to find a link to Keven Bacon based on the type of association that I used in the prior paragraph. It’s a fun game, and for the most part any knowledgeable movie buff can pretty much find a link between Kevin Bacon and just about any major actor of our generation.

So goes the logic that brings us the infamous “al Qaeda” linked terrorist. You see in the eyes of the Bush administration and according to the clearly complicit establishment media, the word “link” is used in its most literal interpretation. All one has to do in order to tag someone with a link to al Qaeda is to apply the A=KB-6 equation. When you use that equation it does not take much to qualify for being linked to al Qaeda these days, unless you are a member of the Bush family. You know, the same Bush family that has direct, official and “pretty much confirmed” links to the bin Laden family. You know…the bin Laden family that has “pretty much confirmed” links to the member of the bin Laden family known as Osama bin Laden. But that link doesn’t really count! Not to the establishment media, anyway.

The big difference between using the A=KB-6 equation to tag someone as an al Qaeda terrorist, and playing Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon is that when you play Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon you have to elaborate and define the link, in complete detail, before you are given credit for your accusation. But the Bush administration and the criminal establishment media simply make a declaration that the link exists and they are done. They do not have to define the link in any way, and the public, so brainwashed by the establishment media, does not even think to question the claim. We are not sure how many hops have to be made until you see an actual connection. Then again, we are not exactly sure what the definitive heart of “al Qaeda” is, so we are not sure what link we have to reach in order to establish the actual connection.

One of the many problems with this scenario is that an idiot like Elizabeth Hasselbeck of the TV show “The View” repeats that link on TV to justify her approval for the Bush administration’s obliteration of Iraq as she argues with Rosie O’Donnell over the killing of innocent civilians by US troops. Then the millions of people who watch “The View” repeat Hasselbeck’s unsubstantiated claims of al Qaeda linked entities in Iraq, even though the links are never actually defined for these people and these people never bother to question the claims for themselves. But we all know that we should simply believe people on TV who show support for whatever our government is doing…otherwise they are not patriots! Right? Actually, that is a separate issue…but technically, by virtue of the A=KB-6 equation, it is connected to this discussion;-)

There is an episode of the cartoon South Park where the kids who star in the show are taken on a hunting trip with a couple of gung-ho gun freak hunters. You know, kind of like Dick Cheney, only these guys don’t murder, they hunt. (Cheney murders animals…he goes on so called hunting trips, but what really happens is that is he goes to farms and the owners of the farms release caged animals in the form of birds that can not even fly, a few dozen yards from Cheney, so that he can satisfy is psychopathic thirst for death by murdering a hundred or so of them.) Anyway, the gung-ho South Park hunters pretty much shoot any animal they want to, without hunting permits, even if the animal is out of season and poses no threat to the hunters. But the hunters taught the kids how to get around the law when it comes to killing things illegally and when it is not warranted by self defense; just prior to opening fire the hunter has to yell out “LOOK OUT, IT’S HEADED RIGHT TOWARDS US!” You see, this way the illegal kills made by the hunters appears to be justified by self defense. Technically the hunters can say that the animal appeared to pose a threat to them, even if the animal was a baby rabbit or something like that. Pretty smart, huh?

The Bush administration and the US media use the South Park hunting justification argument in their never ending war on humanity. I call it the “applying the terror tag”. And there is no better terror tag to apply to your target than one that reads “al Qaeda!” Yes, the mysterious mystical “al Qaeda” organization, whatever that may be, scares the b’jeezus out of the average uninformed American. So all you have to do in order to justify a kill these days is use the Kevin Bacon equation of association. Find a link between your target and “al Qaeda”, no matter how many degrees of separation exist, place your tag, have the media announce the link and start shooting! It is a clear formula, easily followed and proven effective on the catatonic viewers of the establishment media.

So, you see, today’s claimed “al Qaeda linked” targets of the Bush administration are just as linked to al Qaeda as Kevin Bacon is linked to boxing promoter Don King! (Look it up…it’s there;-) I made sure to “pretty much confirm” my claim! But what exactly do these links actually mean? Do they mean anything at all? Think about it!

Reference:

Bush/bin Laden links
Elmer (Dick Cheney) Fudd - One Sick Bastard
Elizabeth Hasselbeck - In a Room Without a View

Memorial Day: Remembering Troops Who Fought AGAINST Nazis, Not For Them

Monday, May 28th, 2007

It is hard to imaging the shame I feel for my nation growing stronger than it has been during these past seven years but this week good old “shoot-em-in-the-face” Dick Cheney helped me to more than just imagine the shame I feel increase. Just days before the holiday on which our nation remembers their fallen soldiers, Dick Cheney was asked to speak at the graduation of our next generation of military officers at the West Point Military Academy. And guess what the ground zero of corruption vice president chose to share with the new military yes men: his criticism of the Geneva Conventions. Can anyone say Nazi Germany?

I hate to say this and I know I am going to get abused over this statement, but I am not one to play politics, so here I go: it is getting very very difficult to support the troops and I no longer support any of the troops who have signed up for the US military after the US invaded a sovereign nation, Iraq. Knowing that Cheney was welcomed to speak at the West Point graduation, as opposed so say, someone who actually served his nation honorably by joining the military at some point during his life instead of getting multiple deferments like Cheney did, really sent it home for me. Then hearing about what he spoke about was the nail in the coffin in which lies my support for the troops. Out of all the respectable former military persons who may have been invited to speak at this year’s commencement, they chose Cheney. Well I say…screw them. They just lost my support.

Are this year’s graduates of West Point idiots and suckers? Are they not aware that the man for whom which they applaud lied to their fellow troops and to the nation when he sent their fellow soldiers to war, to die and kill innocent people? Did they all rise and say “Thank you sir, may I have another” as they showed their masochistic support of a man who betrayed the troops like no other American leader in history?

As the vile criminal, Cheney, who very likely was deeply involved in delivering the attacks of 9/11 to our unformed unsuspecting nation, and who spat upon his obligation to fight for his nation, gave a speech that would have made Hitler proud, protesters were denied their civil rights to free speech and were not permitted to protest our Nazi vice president. I thought the troops were supposed to be protecting our freedom, not cheering the man who is responsible for eliminating it.

Dick Cheney is a enemy of the state. He is in office via election coup which makes him an invader and a criminal. Mountains of evidence exist indicating Cheney’s involvement in the events of 9/11. He clearly was behind the effort to lie this nation into an illegal war and he was the central figure in exposing a covert intelligence agent. And Cheney has been the central figure behind the Bush administration’s assault on the US Constitution. I don’t want to support a military that welcomes a man like Dick Cheney, I want a military that protects us from a man like Dick Cheney! Think about it!

Reference: Cheney’s Secrets

Attention Democrats: I Told You So! Would You Like to Wake Up Now?

Friday, May 25th, 2007

So the Democrats in Congress caved in and the Iraq catastrophe continues. What a surprise. Who’d of thought? I never saw that coming. So what are all you brave bold Democrats going to do now; write an angry e-mail to your reps, get your crazy hats and creative signs and march to some empty buildings in DC? Ooooh you go get’em! The members of Congress must be shaking in their boots…from all the laughter that is!

I have a few questions for Democrats: Do you understand now? Are you starting to get it? Do realize that the issues facing out nation are not political and that they are actually criminal? Do you now realize that this thing you call democracy is a show and that representative government is now nothing more than a hoax! Do you realize that your party, along with the Republican party, is controlled by establishment figures, as are your wonderful do nothing sheep herding activists groups like MoveOn.org?

How many pretend hearings do you need to see before your realize that nobody is being held accountable for all the crimes being exposed during these meetings? What’s the point?

The Democrats were not defeated by George W. Bush or the Republicans during the recent vote on Iraq war funding. They did not cave in. They VOTED to support the Iraq war. Let me tell you something my friends, if something is not right I don’t do it. Period, end of story. If someone wants to hurt themselves I can’t always stop them, but I never support them. I don’t give anybody matches to light their cigarettes, I don’t over fill the plate when my father eats over my house (for health reasons), and I would not vote for something that I don’t believe in; no way, no how. Democrats in Congress made a clear lucid decision to continue on the path that this nation was on when Americans supposedly voted for change. No guns were held to their heads. They voted. Period, end of story. The Democrats have done nothing to change the criminal breakdown of our nation and unless unprecedented jail time is served by the members of the Bush administration and Congress who have treated this nation as the criminal electoral coup invaders that they are would, nothing of substance will have changed as a result of new Democratic control of Congress.

You think your party is better than the Republican party? Think again. Maybe Democratic principles are more human, compassionate and respectable than the greed and hate based theocratic Republican principles, but the parties are not controlled by the voters. They are controlled by the establishment. The one establishment that controls our government.

My friends, we have an executive branch that seized power via election fraud. Every single day for the past seven years new evidence is uncovered proving this. Many people are currently in prison for election fraud related to elections that took place over the past seven years and many more are under investigation or standing trial. If this nation had a legitimate press we would all know this but what this means is that election fraud has taken place. For Congress to pretend that this is not an issue Congress must not be of sound mind. But they are. It is just that they are not representatives of the people.

Democrats are good people but they are weak minded people. Their liberal disposition makes them too trusting of their fellow humans, especially those who call themselves Democrats. Just as with Republicans, all one has to do in order to earn the trust of a Democrat is talk the talk. That’s it. Go through the motions. But just like Republicans, Democrats never look close enough to see that their leaders are not walking the walk. Democrats go over to websites like Crooksandliars.org every day to watch their heroes in Congress make bold statements or to watch bombshell confessions or news reports about Iraq, US Attorneys, manipulated intelligence, criminal irresponsibility related to providing everything from training to health care for the military, etc. Yet these Democrats, completely appeased by “hearings” and freshly disarmed by the assumption of power by so called Democrats in Congress, don’t notice that nothing has changed. Nothing is becoming of any of this. The only difference now is that there are these little shows called hearings from time to time. That’s it. Democrats don’t seem to notice that nothing becomes of those hearings. It’s just a show! “Hey Dems, look, we are fighting for you…so please don’t revolt for real!”

I have to admit that I was fooled to a point. I thought there were some members of Congress who represent the people. Even now I think guys like Ron Paul actually carry out their responsibilities to the people. But all I have to do is look at how fooled I was by Congressman John Conyers before my dreams of a legitimate American government come crashing down to Earth. Remember good old John Conyers; one of the few members of Congress who seemed to notice that this nation had a president most worthy of impeachment and decided to actually prepare articles of impeachment? Did anyone notice that this man worked his butt off to address the issues of high crimes committed by George W. Bush and his gang of PNAC thugs, but he only worked on this little project during the period when it could not possibly go anywhere; you know, when the Republican crime syndicate was controlling Congress. The moment the wonderful world saving Democrats took control of Congress, John Conyers’ dog ate his homework. And guess what, the MoveOn sheep Democrats didn’t blink an eye.

Let me say this very clearly; Democratic control of Congress was a staged event. The establishment orchestrated this in order to calm the public. They created a false sense of security for the millions and millions of people who were getting angrier by the day. Their little gate keeping activists groups like MoveOn.org were only going to keep the public under control for so long by marching the masses down to empty buildings in DC. So the establishment did the smart thing, they gave the Democrats a big useless pacifier: Congress. And just like any pacifier, you can suck all you want…but you’re only going to end up with is spit!

Maybe this is good. Maybe as this joke called democracy becomes more obvious, the pathetic wing of the Democratic party will start taking seriously the very real mountains of evidence related to some real issues, like election fraud and 9/11! Maybe as this laughable in your face fumbling attempt at trying to appear to be doing the right thing continues, the Democrats in government will be the wake up call for the MoveOn sheep. Maybe the people will finally realize that something very serious is wrong. Something much more serious than they had previously believed. Maybe then the people will realize that the problems facing our nation are not all political, they are criminal. Maybe they will realize this this is not an issue of left versus right, it is an issue of the establishment versus the people and our so called democracy.

Folks, wake up. How obvious does it have to be. Wake up, smell the coffee, understand that there is a force, behind the scenes, that controls the agenda, and that your little vote is just just a pacifier. Wake up and realize that people who have researched this stuff and have been ridiculed and called conspiracy “theorists” are actually well researched observers who are trying to warn their fellow citizens. Maybe now you will start understanding this. Maybe this Iraq vote will serve as the first in a series of dots connecting what you see with what the so called conspiracy theorists have been telling you all along. Pay attention and start thinking for yourselves. When you do this you will realize that you are watching a show. A show put in place to keep you from getting out of your seats and doing something about the fact that our nation was taken over, a long time ago and that this thing called democracy is of no interest to the new management.

Your sheep herder activist groups keep you all very busy by marching you around and asking you to “tell Congress” this, or to “tell Congress” that. Save your energy. Stay home. Eat a carrot. Try to teach your dog to play chess. You’ll get the same results. Don’t waste your time or your money on these sheep herder groups. We live in an information age. We have telephones, cell phones, e-mail, web sites, faxes, text messages, bull horns, blimps, skywriters, posters, fortune cookies, and a billion other ways to get our message across. If we have to get in a bus and go down to Washington DC to yell at empty buildings with no media coverage in order to tell our representatives to represent us, the purpose of the trip should be to forcibly replace them with people who will represent us.

Democrats, smell the coffee. The problem is not political; it is sinister. You should be starting to understand this by now. Maybe when you finally understand this you will realize that even the events of 9/11 should come under your scrutiny. Maybe then I will welcome you into the reality based world. But until then, don’t expect too much to change because your establishment Democrats have assumed office. Get rid of the pacifier. It is keeping you from legitimate satisfaction. Think about it!

REFERENCE:

Conspiracy Theory
9/11 Evidence Vs. Conspiracy Theory
9/11
Brad Freedan’s ongoing coverage of election fraud.

Elisabeth Hasselbeck: In a Room Without a View

Thursday, May 24th, 2007

I have got to hand it to the folks over at FOX News. These establishment cronies masquerading as journalists have convinced America that journalism and reality itself are fair and balanced. They have the American people believing that there is always two sides to every issue and that every issue discussed in a public forum must allow equal time and representation to both sides and that countering “opinions” merit equal consideration.

The truth is that reality is rarely balanced. If it is raining outside you can not report that it is not raining just for the sake of being fair and balanced. Practicing “balanced” coverage of reality in essence distorts reality. This is dangerous. It prevents the public from accurately assessing important issues. It is like having one friend tell you not to drink and drive. They tell you the very real facts about how alcohol impairs your vision, affects your reflexes and is responsible for the overwhelming majority of vehicular homicides. Then, just to be balanced you listen to another persons who tells you that it is OK to drive because you only had a few drinks and you only live a few blocks away and so on and so on. Then they cite statistics that show that driving fatalities are caused by many things, not only alcohol and because they found a source for this information that does not view deaths related to drinking and driving as real “homicides”, the numbers look different. That’s balanced, but is it really the kind of balance that we need in this world? Do we really need an opinion that is clearly wrong and clearly dangerous just for the sake of having balance?

Following FOX News’ pathetically unrealistic precedent, the ABC daytime talk show called The View decided that they had to “balance” the reality and common sense provided by Joy Behar and Rosie O’Donnell with the idiocy and blind establishment parroting of Elisabeth Hasslebeck. Sometimes ignorance is dangerous. In the case of Ms. Hasslebeck ignorance is not only dangerous, but it is painfully embarrassing. I don’t watch the program often, but I do tune in from time to time, mostly to hear a rare sound byte of reality on an establishment controlled broadcast. This reality usually comes from Joy Behar or Rosie O’Donnell about issues like 9/11, the Bush administration or Iraq. On these rare occasions I have witnessed the most embarrassing example of a typical American citizen who is completely oblivious to the realities of the world; Elisabeth Hasselbeck. Personally I have not heard a single sentence uttered by this Republican talking point TIVO machine that I could not personally shred and expose as partial information, incomplete information, out of context information or a fabricated misrepresentation of known, officially acknowledged and in most cases undisputed reality.

Now before anyone thinks that I believe that the problem with Ms. Hasslebeck stems from the fact that she utters Republican talking points as opposed to uttering Democratic talking points…do some homework. Research me. Read my writings. This is not about left vs. right. This about a little fairy tales known as American Democracy and the wonderful do no wrong history of the United States of America. Folks, official undisputed history paints a very different picture of the world than the establishment media does. I expose media deception as my profession. I do it full time. I can not explain this claim or back it up in one blog entry. I can however offer to debate anybody on this issue, on TV, with the establishment media big shots. So before anyone ‘discredits’ this article or my opinion, keep in mind that I would gladly be a guest on The View, 60 Minutes, FOX News, CNN, etc, and I would gladly show the world how these media criminals are the greatest threat to American freedom and democracy. In essence I can show Americans that the media is our enemy. I don’t tell people this, I show people this. There is a difference. I offer to back up everything I say, in person, on TV. Even on The View.

Now back to The View. Consider the definition of “balance” in context to the meaning intended by FOX News or our current crop of establishment media criminals: “a state of equilibrium or parity characterized by cancellation of all forces by equal opposing forces.” Taking that definition into account in order to provide balance to “reality”, “truth” or “facts,” you would need something radically “unreal” or “baseless.” Enter Elisabeth Hasselbeck. Here you have the counter balance, if you will, to the legitimate fact based information provided to viewers of the television program The View by Joy Behar and Rosie O’Donnell. What about Barbara Walters you say? Well, Ms. Walters, just like a great many so called journalists and media personalities, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Like the other members of the media who are also part of this secretive organization, Ms. Walters does not inform her viewers about her association with the CFR and like the rest of the CFR members she is not allowed to discuss what goes on at the CFR. Keep in mind that a journalist is supposed to be a professional tattle tale. The Constitution protects journalists (the only profession protected by the Constitution) so that journalists can report back to the people what their elected officials are doing. They are not suppose to join secret organizations that are a very big, yet secretive part of our government apparatus, and then not tell the people what goes on. So to the question “what about Barbara Walters.”, my answer is…I consider her the enemy. She probably knows much more about what has taken place in this world than she has reported to her viewers and I am sure some of the things she has helped to keep secret or to played an active role in deceiving the public about would cause you to agree with my sentiments.

Reality has never been as unbalanced as it is now when it comes to the government of the United States. There is an endless list of disturbing “FACTS”, make that alarming facts related to the Bush administration when it comes to stolen elections, the events of 9/11, lying to start wars, eroding our rights, eliminating our freedom, human rights violations, weakening our nation, obliterating world opinion of our nation, etc. (Again…I offer to back up my claims on TV…but for now you can see the hundreds of pages of documented evidence on the TvNewsLIES.org web site.) We don’t need balance. We need reality. We need to discuss exactly what takes place in the world. We don’t need opinion, we need information. Providing us with this information is the Constitutional obligation of the press. The media should be informing us about what is happening, not exposing us to opinions or counter opinions about what is happening. Joy & Rosie provide us with information. Yes, I know that the information is delivered in an emotional politically charged wrapping, but they provide information none the less; a rarity for TV these days. Elisabeth repeats government talking points. That is not what the media is there for. The media is there to question government, not provide it with free advertising.

So I ask you this…do we really need Elisabeth Hasselbeck “distorting The View just for the sake of balance? Think about it!

Reference:
TvNewsLIES.org main site.
TvNewsLIES.org 9/11 Documentation
Fair and Balanced - A FOXyMornon
Hasselbeck’s Claims of al Qaeda in Iraq - Explained

What Makes Black Ops Legal?

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2007

Hello police? I want to report a possible crime in the White House. Oh, it’s out of your jurisdiction? Whom can I call to report this? Nobody? Oh, this is America and there is no place to report crimes committed by the President.”

When a US president orders the CIA to interfere with the internal affairs of another nation, help fix foreign elections or instigate, support or conduct political coups by way of military takeovers or assassinations, is he breaking the law? Where is it written in our Constitution that a president can use our tax money to break international law or to mess with the political systems of other nations, including nations with democratic rule?

I wonder how the American people would feel about their nation if they understood the history of US involvement in international affairs. I wonder how they would feel if they knew that at one time the US covertly supported most of the people or nations that eventually end up being America’s greatest enemies. From the assassination of Chile’s Allende and al Qaeda’s roots as the CIA trained forces in Afghanistan (supported to defeat the Russians), to the Shah of Iran to the financial support of Hitler and his war machine (thank George W. Bush’s grandfather for that one), America’s conduct around the world, using our tax money, is responsible for some pretty bad things.

But the American people will never know what their nation actually does. The media work hand in hand with our leaders to create policy and decide what to tell the American people, if anything at all. If you need proof of this just look at the upcoming super secret Bilderberg meeting where world leaders meet with media owners to discuss issues like Iran. Media owners should not be meeting with policy makers, they should be reporting about policy makers. Here you have a long history of the media meeting in secret with leaders of the world to discuss global issues yet they do not report about these meetings. What do you think they are talking about? The media are there because they are in integral part of the establishment, they are not the journalists who are supposed to report to the people, not brain wash them.

So now we read about covert operations designed to destabilize Iran, and I ask…who asked me for my OK do spend my tax money this way. I think the funniest thing about America is that Americans believe that we live in a democracy. Yet when you ask Americans what part they play in this so called democracy all they say is that they vote. Well the few who vote say that. So once a year, or once every two to four years people go into a little booth and press some buttons or pop some chads from a punch card. That’s it. That’s the average American’s total involvement in this so called democracy. And in the meantime our leaders do whatever the hell they want to anyone they feel like messing with.

Democracy? Give me a break. Think about it!

Reference: Bush Authorizes New Covert Action Against Iran

American Troops: Iraq’s Illegal Aliens

Monday, May 21st, 2007

Imagine for a moment you were living on another planet. Imagine that on the other planet there were legitimate journalists with no connections of any kind to governments in our universe. Now imagine you were a journalist on that planet. Imagine hard that you are not an American and for the purpose of this commentary try to detach yourself from any patriotic, home-team, emotional obligations.

Now pretend that you, as a journalist, were covering the events on Earth when the invasion of Iraq occurred. What term would you use to describe the “Coalition” forces, or most specifically the American forces? Even better, what terms would you use to describe the factions who have been fighting the American forces in Iraq?

In America we are told that the Iraqi’s who fight Americans are terrorists. We are told that they are insurgents. We are told they are the enemy. We hear the American media describe the forces who are fighting against Americans in Iraq and against each other, in terms of their alleged conduct…that is to say, in terms of their conduct according to America. For all we know they could simply be freedom fighters; or at least some of them could be. But despite their use of different terms for the ‘enemy,’ we never hear our media describe American troops as anything but American troops. Why is that?

So if you were a journalist on that other planet, what terms would you use to described the participants in the violence taking place in Iraq these days? When you wrote about the Iraqis (at this late stage in the game), you may have to use several terms because at this point a number of brand new “causes” have been created by the invasion, and that has resulted in a wide variety a motivation for the violence. As a responsible journalist you would have to clarify this for your readers. At this point in Iraq, you would have to describe the Iraqi forces as “religious fanatics fighting a civil war”, “vengeance squads” (you see there is a long history in Iraq…one that American’s don’t know much about), “furious native residence who have had family members killed or brutalized by the Americans and have had their homes and lives destroyed by those same Americans”, and you may have to use the term “foreign agitators” who have seized upon the opportunity created by the Americans to weaken America and drain our resources. You would not really use the term “terrorist”. You see a terrorist is one that inflicts harm using sneaky methods, resulting in fear. Terrorists target innocent people in random locations. The attacks taking place in Iraq are taking place on a battlefield. The Americans turned Iraq into a battlefield the moment they dropped the first bomb on a civilian occupied city. The warring factions in Iraq are hitting hard targets, specifically chosen by them. And if one were to believe American logic and reasoning, any innocent people who fall victim to this violence are simply “collateral damage.”  And we all know that “collateral damage” is a perfectly acceptable byproduct of war. So if civilians who are killed by Americans are called “collateral damage,” the civilians who are killed by Iraqi fighters should be called “collateral damage” Well, at least some of the killed civilians fall under that category.

Now that we settled that, what term would you use to describe the Americans in Iraq? Surely you would describe them as something other than “Americans”. You would not be able to use the term “defense forces” because they were not being threatened when they invaded Iraq. As a matter of fact, at the time of the invasion Iraq caved in to the pressure of a threat of an invasion and was pretty much cooperating with the international community to prove that it posed no threat. A lot of arm twisting was necessary but lets face it, there was plenty of arm twisting capability available for use when needed. I’ll tell you, I have thought about this for years and I can not think of a better term for the American troops in Iraq than “invaders.”  “Occupational forces” don’t even cut it for me. You see they had to invade in order to occupy. As a matter of fact American’s in Iraq are actually currently “illegal aliens!” (Can you hear me Lou Dobbs?) As a matter of fact if Iraq had a Lou Dobbs of their own he would be reporting, every day, about the outsourcing taking place! After all you have all these foreign companies hired to “rebuild” their nation!

Think about it, Americans crossed the borders into Iraq, illegally, took up residence, created a situation where their nation, a foreign nation, America, will make money from Iraqi oil, taking money away from the Iraqi people, and the Iraqi citizens are paying the price. Americans have had a catastrophic impact on the Iraqi economy, health care system, educational system, infrastructure, and American invasion has resulted in the obliteration of Iraqi’s “homeland security.” All this as a result of the new onslaught of illegals into Iraq. Illegals not only from America but brought in by America or attracted there by the American presence there. Mexicans Illegals in America don’t hold a candle to American illegals in Iraq! It is like the difference between trowing a bullet and shooting a bullet; no comparison!

Positive arguments can be made about the American illegals in Iraq, just like the positive arguments being made about the illegal Mexicans in America. The Americans are helping the Iraqis; they are building schools, and they got rid of a tyrant, and they give the children candy…you know…watch Fox News…you’ll see what I mean. And the Mexicans we are told take jobs that Americans don’t want to do, and they provide inexpensive labor, etc. You know…watch the Democrats on C-SPAN. The only difference is…The negative aspects of Mexicans in America pale in comparison to the negative aspects of Americans in Iraq. Can anyone seriously compare crossing a border to wash dishes and get health care for their children to obliterating a nation and stealing their oil money? If I had the time I would do a detailed comparison of the impact of Mexican illegals on America as compared to the impact of American illegals on Iraq; but it really doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see the difference.

So there you have it, the accurate terms for Americans in Iraq are “invaders” and “illegal aliens.”  But not just the average illegal alien, like to one’s in America. The America illegals in Iraq were placed there by (and actually are) the most powerful military on Earth! What would Lou Dobbs be saying if the Mexican military played a similar role here!

Here in dreamland, better known as America, people learn about what is going on in the world by listening to pundits and journalists (in America these are one and the same these days), instead of by actually watching the events that take place and making up their own minds. You see as Americans are given information they are simultaneously told how to feel. It’s like that scene in the movie Young Frankenstein where the monster (played by Peter Boyle) is sitting with the old man (played by Gene Hackman) , having wine, (well - trying to, anyway), and the old man offers the monster a cigar. Now the monster is scared of fire so he reacts loudly when the old man goes to light the monster’s cigar. The old man tells the monster “fire good” and the monster accepts this from the old man has he now allows the old man to light his cigar with the “good fire”  As the “fire good” attitude takes hold, the old man lights the monster’s finger on fire. For several moments that “fire good” attitude holds steady even as the monster’s finger cooks itself as it is now fully engulfed in flames. Finally the monster cant take it any more and bolts out of there! It is at this point he realizes that in this case fir was bad all along, even though he was told otherwise.

You see, the monster in the movie knew that fire was bad all along but for some reason he trusted the person telling him otherwise. He should have gone with his instincts. So should America when it comes to judging the actions of our government. Think about it!

27 Buildings on 104 Acres is NOT an Embassy; It’s an Occupation.

Thursday, May 17th, 2007

Keeping track of the lies of the establishment media and the Bush administration is like trying to keep track of sand and dirt particles during a tornado. But once in a while a huge chuck hits you right in the face! Even still…the establishment media pretend it’s not there.

We hear George W. Bush lie regularly about almost everything he says. But on the issue of Iraq we have heard many times how the Unites States will be leaving Iraq when the Iraqi’s are able to stand on their own. OK…fine…but how does that explain the 104 acre so called embassy consisting of 27 buildings? Leaving a 104 acre city in Iraq does not exactly meet the description of “leaving!”

Here we have a long time coming, in your face clear and obvious piece of proof that George W. Bush lies when he talks about plans for Iraq, and the establishment media will not inform the public about this. Not one word of this is ever mentioned on TV. 104 ACRES!!! Holy cow…give me a break! Did we steal the land from the Iraqis for this or did OUR tax dollars pay for it? Either way it is another smoking gun exposing the many lies of George W. Bush!

104 acres does not make an embassy. It makes a city, a base, occupied territory, but most of all in this case 104 acres serves as proof of another lie of George W. Bush and another lie to the American people by the media. We are not leaving Iraq, no way, no how, even though George W. Bush says otherwise.

Seven years on I am trying to find one thing that George W. Bush has not lied about and I am trying to find one lie that the establishment media accurately described as intentional and willing deception by George W. Bush. Then again I am still trying to figure out where the tooth fairy lives. How silly of me to try and find the answers to these obvious issues! Think about it!

Oh Government….Please Protect Me From Those Threatening Vitamins!

Wednesday, May 16th, 2007

While he Bush administration makes sure that we have the freedom to breath in more pollutants every day, and while they allow environmental polluters to comply with voluntary regulations the FDA is getting ready to protect Americans from all of those dangerous nutrients that we need to live! That’s right…vitamins are about to be outlawed!

Do a little research and you will find that there is a world wide effort, backed by big pharma, to keep nutrients out of the hands of citizens. This is outrageous!

The FDA, an institution that has made an art form out of approving drugs with more dangerous side effects than a drunk driver, is about to protect you from vitamin C! Ladies and gentlemen…these people must be stopped! I ask you to do a little research on this. The issue is bigger than one or two recent articles on may indicate!

It becomes more apparent every day that government has become the enemy of the people. It is going to be interesting to see how far we citizens let this go. Think about it!

Sometimes There Are Stupid Questions

Monday, May 14th, 2007

For most of my life I have encouraged curiosity. I have always felt that there is nothing wrong with asking questions about things that you don’t know. I had a long career in technology and I have had to teach many people many things. I have also had to learn many things. I was fortunate enough to work with people who were gracious with their knowledge and they shared it with me. I did and still do the same. I take the time to explain, what is to me the most boring and obvious technological information, with anyone who needs my help (well almost anyone). I understand that it is OK not to know everything and the only way to learn is to admit to yourself that you don’t know something…and then find out the answers. Asking questions is one way of learning and I understand that there is nothing wrong with doing so. So I adhere to the notion that there are no stupid questions, (just stupid people!)

On the other hand…when a so called journalist, or reporter, or TV news reader, blathers on and forces him or herself to come up with questions while they are conducting an on air interview, just for the sake of filling time, my opinion about stupid questions is rendered invalid. When I watch the bozos on TV fill time by forcing themselves to ask questions for the sake of pretending to be journalists I repeatedly find myself uttering, out loud, the phrase “what the f*#K does that have to do with anything?” Some, or I should say most of the questions asked by these on-air talking heads do nothing more than expose the limited intellectual capacities of today’s TV news zombies.

I know most of the on-screen teleprompter readers are vain to some extent. Nobody would want to put their face on TV everyday unless they had some sort of self appreciation. But you would think that a little pride would prevent these vain individuals from wanting to look stupid. One would think that, but one would be wrong. But then again, most Americans have been conditioned to the point of not being able to spot the obvious, even if the obvious comes in the form of a blithering idiot pretending to be a journalist!

The on-air TV clowns are to journalism what the first round rejects are to the American Idol competition. Unfortunately it would take an American Idol/Journalism Edition before the masses of oblivious Americans noticed this! Think about it!

A Mother’s Day Message to George!

Friday, May 11th, 2007

Hey, George! While Laura and Mama Bush are opening their Mother’s Day cards, just take a minute to think about the mothers you’ve sent to fight your freaking wars. And take a nanosecond to think about the mothers of all the troops you’ve used as fodder for your dreams of empire. Yeah, like you give a tinker’s damn….

I doubt that you’re even capable of imagining the kind of Mother’s Day they’re having, George. Life in your sociopathic bubble doesn’t allow for any reality or empathy, so let me clue you in.

Here are some of the numbers, George, if you can handle the math:

- Right now there are 24, 475 women deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan, and close to FORTY PERCENT of these women are mothers. To make it easier for you, - that comes to more than NINE THOUSAND women celebrating a dangerous and miserable Mother’s Day in your illegal and immoral debacle.

- For the record, as of April of this year, 85 women have lost their lives in your bloody quest for empire. It figures that some of them were, or might one day have become mothers. Surely most of them had mothers. Thanks to you, they won’t be celebrating any Mother’s Days ever again. Doesn’t that make you proud?

- And, again for the record, 474 women have been wounded in Iraq as of April, 2007. You don’t dare show us the severity of their wounds, but we can guess that many of these women have been left with massive wounds and missing limbs and emotional scars that they will last for many Mother’s Days to come. Doesn’t that bother you, even a little?

I’ll bet you didn’t know this about military mothers either, George:

According to a report today from the bi-partisan Joint Economic Committee, you’re short about 35,000 child care centers for military families. Nice going, George. You’ve also run short on resources for mental health service to help military mothers and their children. Isn’t that just special?

I suppose you were too busy planning your celebrations with Laura and Mama Bush to do anything about this, George. I know, you’ve had a rough couple of months and just couldn’t get around to it. Never mind, there’s always next year.

But, for just a second, George, imagine what today must be like for Cindy Sheehan and the other mothers who won’t get Mother’s Day cards from the sons and daughters who never came back from your horrible war. Can you do that?

There’s something so wrong with this picture, George. I haven’t even brought up the mothers in Iraq. That’s a whole other story that I’ll talk to you about another time. Right now, it’s Mother’s Day in the USA, George, and you’ve made it a tragic and devastating day for so many American mothers. I hope Laura and Mama Bush have as good a day as the other women I’ve told you about, George. It’s the least they can do.

After all, it’s been four Mother’s Days since you and your PNAC buddies lied us into this mess, George, and you’re all still clueless.

Reference:

Joint Economic Committee Report

-


Bad Behavior has blocked 215 access attempts in the last 7 days.