Who’s Better Off Without Saddam?

Who’s better off and how are they better off? I would like someone to tell me exactly, in detail, how the world is better off now that Saddam is gone? It seems quite obvious to me that he was MUCH better at keeping violence to a minimum in Iraq.

Sure he killed and tortured the so called trouble makers, but isn’t that what the US is doing now? The only difference is that the people of Iraq were not blowing up on a daily basis and they were not getting caught in any crossfire.

So tell me again how all these deaths, including the 2100 or so Americans, translate into “better off?” Somebody please tell me! Think about it!

2 Responses to “Who’s Better Off Without Saddam?”

  1. ian says:

    Aw come on Jesse, there are lots of people better off, let me see, well Haliburton, Custer Battles, the Carlyle group, BP, on which I must ask, with the likes of BP’s profits up 400% how the hell have they got the neck to put gas prices up.

  2. Jesse says:

    I stand corrected Ian!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Bad Behavior has blocked 216 access attempts in the last 7 days.