So 60 Minutes had free access to Bin Ladenâ€™s driver? They expect us to believe that 60 Minutes had access to this most valuable target of the US war on terror, yet the U.S. has not attempted to â€œrenditionâ€ him into one of our secret prisons by now? The host nation of this terror suspect never even gets mentioned by our controlled media? What happened to Bushâ€™s â€œwith us or against usâ€ threat to nations that host terrorists?
Do you know why I think this is the case? I think this is because this asset serves to continue to the myth of the Al Qaeda 9/11 cover story. The FACTS about 9/11 are starting breakthrough to the public and the people who really run this nation are pulling out their big guns (60 Minutes) to counter the evidence of their complicity.
What did this guy prove on 60 Minutes? He told a story. Apparently his knowledge was of no interest to the people fighting the war on terror. They donâ€™t even mention him. So that must mean they want him out there, with all his inside knowledge of Bin Laden and Al Qaeda yet Quakers and peace activists in the U.S. are being watched closely by our men in black.
How stupid are we? How do we not see through this at this point?
Here is what I think about Bin Laden. I think he has not made any video tapes because he is unwilling to go as far as his bosses. I think he wants nothing to do with defaming Islam by forever linking it with 9/11. When Bin Laden made his first public statement after 9/11 he said that he had nothing to do with it. He claimed that he heard that â€œthey say the Atta group did thisâ€ but he could have heard that on TV like everyone else. The only Bin Laden confession came in the form of a fake video and since then he has not been seen. I think he had to be killed because he would talk and let the public know that he was not responsible for 9/11 or he is simply not playing along any more. I have no evidence of this, just common sense based on what has unfolded and uncovered. Think about it!