Let us for a minute realize that our government uses code names for many things. They use code names for military operations, espionage operations, CIA operations, law enforcement operations, social programs, etc.
From Operation Iraqi Freedom to Able Danger virtually all government operations are named in code and the more secret the operation the more ambiguous the name. For example â€œOperation Zapataâ€ was the code name for the Bay of Pigs invasion. â€œOperation Mockingbirdâ€ is the name for the secret program where the CIA works with the corporate media to â€œmanipulate and control public perception!â€
So keeping that in mind think back to when George W. Bush received a top secret report prior to 9/11 called â€œBin Laden Determined to Attack.â€ Is it so outrageous to think that â€œBin Ladenâ€ is code? Did you ever think that perhaps the term â€œBin Ladenâ€ is code for â€œrogue group of enemies on the inside?â€
Keep in mind if my guess is accurate everybody in our government can continue to blame â€œBin Ladenâ€ for the attacks of 9/11 and technically not be lying. They can even pass a lie detector test.
We are told that the intelligence agencies from around the world were warning us prior to 9/11 that something big was about to happen. What do you think is more likely: they were all watching terrorists who wanted to harm other countries, like the US, or they were hearing chatter within the global intellegence agencies that they were spying on? Intelligence agencies spy on each other for the most part. I would think their priority would be to look out for themselves as opposed to watching out for the enemies of other nations. Maybe while they were spying on each other they caught wind of the plans to conduct a huge false flag operation and they wanted to make sure Bush knew about it. Maybe they were saying â€œhey, Bush, your guys are going live with a false flag attack and we don’t think that this is not a good idea! Are you ware of this?â€ Seriously, they can not just come out and say it because they would have to pretty much blow their cover and admit to the world that false flag operations exist. So they drape their actions in pseudo reality so that they can say as much as they can truthfully without actually blowing the whistle. So instead of saying â€œyour guys are going too farâ€ they say â€Bin Ladenâ€ is determined to attack.
Then again maybe Osama bin Laden was the coordinating officer for the false flag operation. Maybe he was the operational guy for the rogue group. And maybe when George Tenet says that he wanted to get Bin Laden he was serious because he was trying to stop the rogue group.
In a nutshell I am saying that very few things are actually as they appear when it comes to intelligence operations and we would be fools to believe that the language used in relation to Al Qaeda is as simple as they would have them to belive. If there were ever a time one should read between the lines this is it! Think about it!