About Those Nuclear Attack Speculations

UPDATED 04-August-2005- Read part 2 by clicking here!

Some rumors eventually prove to be accurate foreknowledge. I hope that this one turns out to be silly paranoia spawned by someone (me) who gets too much email and worries too much!

We hear it every day from our government officials: “It’s not a matter of if, but when!” This phrase of course referrers to the domestic nuclear terrorism that our government tells us in inevitable. Naturally when our our government tells us this we have to respect their words. But when similar information is sourced to independent media the “conspiracy theory” tag is immediately applied. Let’s all hope that we can look back at this note and tag it as well meaning alarm and not as foreknowledge.

Before I fill you in on the information rumor mill regarding supposed upcoming nuclear terror let’s keep a few things in mind:

1. The US government is warning us that a nuclear terrorists attack is imminent. It is just a matter of time.
2. Nuclear weapons have only been manufactured by governments; with the US government being the most prolific producer.
3. The above 2 facts should lead you to realize that nuclear weapons do not get used without some kind of government involvement. Governments are the only entities that have the ability to manufacture nuclear weapons and they have always been in complete control of these weapons.
4. The fact is that no nuclear device has or will ever go off without the knowledge of at least one government that has a nuclear weapons program. We all know about the official nuclear capable nations and we all know that Israel is the unofficial nation to have nuclear capabilities. What is taking place, as was the case with Iraq, is that Iran is being set up as a nuclear threat in the event of a nuclear terror incident. Iran is not a nuclear WMD producer and if they were their technology would be so primitive that they would not be able to produce a small nuclear device that can be delivered by a terrorist. Nations do not jump from having no nuclear capabilities to producing the state of the art miniature nuclear devices. It just does not happen. Only the Soviet Union, the US and Israel would have that capability at this time. Perhaps some of the other nuclear nations can produce such devices but it is unlikely. What is surely unlikely is that Iran can produce them. Keep that in mind.

More background: Any president worth his salt is supposed to try to make the citizens feel safe and secure. George W. Bush and his PNAC warriors have done nothing but try to keep us frightened to death. Without even throwing a rock, by keeping us scared, this administration has terrorized the citizens of out nation and of the world. They are terrorists by virtue of the fact that they keep us in a continual state of fear. George W. Bush and his PNAC handlers use fear as tool to garner support for their otherwise unacceptable agenda. Any time they want to go after some person or some nation they raise the country’s fear factor in relation to that person or nation to unrealistic level so that Americans are frightened enough to permit the administration to do anything and everything to protect us. All this occurs even though the rationale for the fear is unfounded.

As professed by the members of the Bush administration who have taken part in the agenda of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), events the likes of “Pearl Harbor” can frighten the people of this nation into supporting even the most radical agenda of their group. It is the old adage of being protected from a perceived enemy that is at play here. Even though issues such as environmental pollutants pose a far greater risk to the lives of Americans, the perceived threat posed by the media created bogey man known as the terrorist, is being used to scare the people into supporting Bush the “Protector.” Operation Northwoods is a perfect historic documentation of this strategy. This operation was designed to utilize the fear factor to garner support for unnecessary military interventions. Operation Northwoods was a government plan to conduct false flag terror operations on our own nation and blame these events on a foreign country; in this case the country was Castro’s Cuba. The US planned to conduct state engineered terrorism which would then be blamed on Cuba. The result of this operation would be public support for protection by any means necessary against a perceived threat (Cuba in this case). This is not a new concept, and has been used for centuries. Hitler’s self inflicted Reichstag Fire is the perfect example of such state sponsored terrorism. Of course the example are numerous. . If the 9/11 researchers are correct in their suspicions those attacks served as a perfect example of a false flag operation. It had motive, means and response all fitting the blueprints for such a scheme.

THE RUMORS: I get a ton of email each day. I also read a great deal of news from a many sources. What I am hearing these days is very frightening, although it is VERY difficult to believe. It is for this reason I do not post all my information on the main web site. However I do want to share some of the chatter because if any of this information is accurate I want the real story to be heard BEFORE any official cover stories get out.

I repeat this is all chatter…none of which I can corroborate. There is quite a lot of information coming in so I will share some of it with you.

It is believed that Dick Cheney, a known PNAC kingpin, has ordered plans to be drawn up preparing for a launch of a nuclear attack on Iran to be used as a retaliation for a massive terror attack on the US. This information has come from several rather reliable sources. At the same time a stepped up PR campaign to make the public think Iran is developing nuclear weapons is underway.

Obviously Cheney can not launch an attack of any kind on Iran without provocation. I doubt that this nation will allow another Iraq to take place. So according to the rumor mill there are terror events planned that will provide the justification for a new military and perhaps nuclear strike by the PNAC crew.

My sources tell me that there will be one or more events taking place to justify such actions. The events are as follows: (AGAIN, I REITERATE THAT THIS IS UNCORROBORATED RUMOR!)

1. Terror attacks, perhaps in the form of perceived suicide bombings, will take place at venues that represent the heart of America, such as a baseball game or holiday celebration.
2. A US warship will come under attack in the Persian Gulf.
3. Nuclear terror will reach American shores. Small nuclear devices will go off in one or more American cities. These cities are to be large but not key cities like New York or LA. Death tolls of 200,000 per event are predicted.
4. I have received information from 2 sources (both sources claim CIA connections), that Mossad has started to pull their agents out of the US in anticipation of the nuclear events.

Some facts to go along with the rumors:
1. The events of 9/11 took place on a day and at the same time of day that hijacking and terror drills in the northeast (NY specifically) were taking place.
2. The London bombings took place as drills to deal with the exact kind of event were taking place.
3. Nuclear preparedness drills are to take place in the US in August of this year.

Again…this is all just crazy rumor right now. But some rumors turn out to be legitimate foreknowledge. If these or similar events do take place, the word on the street as we know it today indicates that these events would have been state sponsored false flag operations. We should keep that in mind…but hopefully you will be able look back at this little blurb as paranoid induced hysteria.

From the rumor mill…

Note to name calling skeptics: It is the Bush administration and the right wing FOX News types who keep telling us that it is a matter of when, not if. It is these people who maintain the fear levels in this nation. So when people start to speculate and rumors start flying remember that they origniate from the Bush administration. They are the ones who chose to keep us in fear and make us feel that we are not safe. It was a Democrat who said that we have nothing to fear but fear itself. It is the Bush adminisrtation who says we must fear. Blame them for any rumors. They give the world good reasons to suspect them.

More:
Exercise to focus on nuclear terror scenario -Here’s the scenario…A seafaring vessel transporting a 10-kiloton nuclear warhead makes its way into a port off the coast of Charleston, S.C. Terrorists aboard the ship attempt to smuggle the warhead off the ship to detonate it. Is this really a possibility? - Joint Task Force Civil Support (JTF-CS) here is planning its next exercise on the premise that this crisis is indeed plausible.
U.S. warns Iran against violating nuclear deal
They Are Not “Conspiracy Theories” - They Are, in Fact, “Discoveries”
UPDATED:
Someone sent me this after I wrote the above entry:
Israel, Iran, Mossad and a Nuclear False Flag Attack

And this:
Two NASA Scientists Tipped Off In 1987 About U.S. Government Plans To Cause 9/11 - Bin Laden Brothers Tip-Off Two NASA Research Scientists In 1987 About U.S. Government Plans To Cause 9/11; Now Third Person Comes Forward To Verify Scientists’ Incredible StoryBesides the tip-off about 9/11, one of the researchers involved in a government-funded advanced brain development program says she uncovered a secret study called “Global Cleanse 2000″ outlining U.S. Government strategies for intitiating global war and population reduction.

And this:
Former British MI5 Agent Says ‘Many Similarities’ Between London Bombings And 9/11 - Jailed in 2002 for blowing the whistle on payoffs by British MI6 to an Islamic terrorist group to kill Mu’ammar al-Qadhafi of Libya, David Shayler this week talks openly from his home on the southern coast of England about how he feels both the London bombings and 9/11 were most likely staged government events. He claims the free people of the world are at war with an enemy within and either democracy will prevail or a facist rule and martial law will take over.

Added 7/30/05:
Deep Background - In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same for Iran.

Added 7/31/05:
Former CIA Officer - US Plans Nuclear Attack On Iran - Giraldi said that the U.S. nuclear strike against Iran would take place after a 9/11-style attack on the United States, and that the planned attack would be analogous to the unprovoked invasion of Iraq. - The former CIA officer also said that an attack on the U.S. would serve as the pretext for putting the plan into action. - He noted that some Air Force officers are opposed to the nuclear strike plan “but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections.”

UPDATED 04-August-2005- Read part 2 by clicking here!

7 Responses to “About Those Nuclear Attack Speculations”

  1. scaredinamerica says:

    Lots of military planes flying low and slow in Idaho these days..

    Em
    http://scaredinamerica.blogspot.com/

  2. bluey says:

    I just love all this scaremongering about Nuclear whatever. It truly amazes me, and also my friends from the RAAF, why everyone in the world is so prepared to comment on topics they really know stuff-all about!!!
    For instance, there can never be a Nuclear war, or for that matter a Nuclear retaliation. The only act that can be performed involving anything Nuclear is just one detonation, then that’s it! The next detonation cannot take place until the Sun and it’s Sunspot activity distorts the Magnetic Field and reaches the right climax, thereby allowing for detonation.
    The reason there are so many tests around the world (most of which you will never hear about) is an Irish answer: “To Be Sure, To Be Sure”
    Whosoever does not wish to understand this in these simple layman’s terms should do some serious scientific study like ourselves, using no-one else but Bruce Cathie (The first man to complete Einstein’s Theory of relativity) and ALL of his books.
    Ask yourselves why there have never been any scientists commenting on “Nuclear War” because they know it’s a sheer impossibility………….Can Never Happen!
    Your very own Crosby, Stills and Nash told you many times, but nobody over there listens.
    “Paranoia strikes deep, Into your mind it will creep”
    So, get on with your lives, Live them to the max, stop worrying about things you hear from your Authorities, and for God’s sake quit filling the internet with absolute bullshit so we can have room on the airwaves for real stuff like music with some substance, OK?
    I have also died and come back from the “other side”, whatever you wish to call it, and the main message I remember, among others, is that “MOST PEOPLE ON PLANET EARTH ARE TOO BUSY WORRYING WHAT THEY WILL BE DOING FOR THE NEXT 50 YEARS INSTEAD OF WONDERING WHAT THEY WILL BE DOING FOR THE NEXT 50,000 YEARS…………………….So come on people get some lives huh!

  3. mikimouse says:

    The so-called micro-nukes are a reality and in fact are present in the US at this moment, but that’s not to say anyone has anything to fear over it. They’ve been there for a long long time. And contrary to what most people believe, micro-nukes have already been used at least twice in the past five years or so. The Australian Embassy blast. According to one report, “blast overpressure shattered every pane of reinforced laminated glass in every high rise building inside a 500 yard radius, and severely compromised structural integrity”. A very powerful blast. Note the word overpressure. “The Australian Embassy was so badly undermined by the subterranean shock wave that it will have to be demolished”.
    This link shows how it can be done. https://www.osti.gov/opennet/forms.jsp?formurl=films/data/0800031.html
    A visual comparison here.
    http://www.vialls.com/myahudi/images/0_micronuke_composite.jpg

  4. tapirsaver says:

    Apparently “scaredinamerica” is clueless..he/she may want to do a quick google on nuclear weaponry. Hint:Nagasaki

  5. [...] hink I’ve made my point, so on with the rumors: As some of you know, there are many rumors afoot about state-sponsored, false flag, nuclear terror attacks right here in the good old USA. You can c [...]

  6. Craneger says:

    Hello from a newbie! I have three thoughts:
    1) On 9/11 the Pentagon was attacked for credibility, because if all the 9/11 targets were civilian, the true operation might be questioned under those terms.
    2) A low-yield device (approx. 2 to 4 kilotons) would knock out a three- quarter mile radius but still be “small” enough to control the mess. It would look homemade and be untraceable, of course.
    3) Therefore, the most likely focus of a false flag would primarily be a military or other government site, with severe civilian collateral, or other sites attacked (remember the 7/7 bombings in London) with a low-yield device, thereby affording the long-awaited “triggering event” for nuclear intervention against Iran.
    Hey, you guys wouldn’t be fans of Alex Jones, would you??

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Bad Behavior has blocked 631 access attempts in the last 7 days.