It is currently Sat Aug 23, 2014 4:08 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Roadside bombs
PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:26 am 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 6:59 pm
Posts: 170
Location: n.c.
Over 3/4ths of the soldiers killed are attributed to these devices. To me this just does not make any sense, neither does the war for that matter but is this practice fighting insurgents how ? Can you imagine these soldiers loading up to go out on patrol knowing at any moment one of these could going off. The news this morning said that we lost 90+ soldiers last month because of these. What the hell is the thought process behind this, the level of RS bombs has not decreased its increased an were making progress ! All we are doing is swapping bodies for bombs. :x

_________________
tbolt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2005 12:21 am 
Offline
SuperMember!
SuperMember!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 6:19 pm
Posts: 2533
3/4's is a lot. What a way to hunt for bombs. Using live humans as guinea pigs. It is obvious that stealth is their only way to attack, as like minutemen they seize whatever method they can to instill fear in their enemy. It keeps one on edge constantly, and shatters the nerves. As you said, at any moment.

The British in 1776 felt the same way and wished for the enemy to engage them in conventional form. This tactic of guerilla conflict in Iraq, is because they could never win a war where Americans could call in planes to settle the battle. As in Vietnam, where teams of Americans were sent out to engage and find the enemy and then, call in an airstrike to settle the score. Heavy handed and effective, it forces the enemy to be resourceful and dirty. But all's fair in war and when the rules of engagement are preset, then you must improvise, strike quick and retreat, to engage another day. The object is to kill or injure young men, preferrably white, to dishearten the troops on the ground and those waitng for sonny to return, at home. Seems to be working.

Perhaps progress is not intended, but rather keep things at a distance, you know, suicide bombers, mortar attacks etc. There is no real attempt to drive Americans out of Iraq, just to remind them they are not welcome. They can never organise enough to rise up and take the offensive, but it appears as if they are unwilling to settle it on either side. Just keep it a moral victory for each side and continue the occupation.

As always, it is the young men on both sides who sacrifice their lives for the greater good, whatever that is. If we could probe our leaders minds we would all be wiser to their intent. Until we can, it is the great mystery- Why?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 11:18 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 4:09 pm
Posts: 121
Location: Not in the USA
Why?
Read Orwell's 1984 . The more money spent on war (real or imagined) the less there is to ease the plight of the masses.


Roll on GW. Lydon and Tricky Dick were taught by the VC that the US can't win a guerilla war.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Blue Moon by Trent © 2007
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group