Bush’s Loose Ends

Catherine · **Posted:** Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:54 am

Bush’s Loose Ends

By Eugene Robinson

George W. Bush’s presidency seems exhausted and irrelevant, but that’s a dangerous illusion. The Decider remains in command of the world’s most advanced and powerful military force, and he has just a few months to tie up what he might consider loose ends—a thought sobering enough to send Amy Winehouse to rehab.

We can only hope he considers his “denuclearization” agreement with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Il a sufficient legacy. Assuming the deal keeps North Korea from making more nuclear weapons, Bush will be 1 for 3 in dealing with his Axis of Evil. (If you ignore the fact that Pyongyang went nuclear on Bush’s watch, that is.)

As for the other Evils, we know the story: Iraq is a bloody quagmire that has claimed more than 4,000 American lives, and Iran is more powerful than at any time since the fall of the shah. Bush’s legacy on the world stage is defined by Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, secret CIA prisons and waterboarding. His successor will face an enormous task in restoring America’s image and moral standing.

But if Bush is chastened by failure or troubled by doubt, he doesn’t show it. He has said that he expects to be vindicated by history. The danger is that he will decide to give historians more fodder by taking care of unfinished business—especially business that the next president might want no part of.

The biggest question is whether Bush will do what John McCain once jokingly suggested, to the tune of an old Beach Boys hit: “Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran.” Bush has been categorical in saying that Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, even as the Iranians have defiantly expanded their nuclear facilities and sped production of the enriched uranium that would be needed to fuel a bomb. Experts do not believe Iran is close to actually producing a nuclear weapon, but do not doubt the Iranians could eventually succeed. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said repeatedly, if not convincingly, that Iran’s nuclear program has strictly peaceful aims.

Will Bush take the chance that our next president—especially if it’s Barack Obama, but even if it’s McCain—might not see the Iran question in such black-and-white terms? The New Yorker magazine reported Sunday that the Bush administration told Congress last year that it planned to spend up to $400 million to expand covert operations inside Iran—a campaign aimed at destabilizing the government and gathering intelligence on the nuclear program. The administration quickly denied that U.S. forces were “operating across the Iraqi border into Iran,” but did not directly address the main thrust of the story.

It’s not hard to fathom the ominous, potentially catastrophic implications of a U.S. attack on Iran’s enrichment plants and other nuclear installations. Meanwhile, on another front, Bush is working as hard as he can to cement an agreement on the long-term status of U.S. forces in Iraq before the new president takes office. The basic issue being negotiated appears to be whether the United States military will retain much of the authority and responsibility of an occupying power, even as it ostensibly surrenders control to the Iraqi government.

COMMENTS

A Proud Liberal · **Posted:** Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:05 am

Catherine wrote:

Meanwhile, on another front, Bush is working as hard as he can to cement an agreement on the long-term status of U.S. forces in Iraq before the new president takes office. The basic issue being negotiated appears to be whether the United States military will retain much of the authority and responsibility of an occupying power, even as it ostensibly surrenders control to the Iraqi government.

I am sickened by the sham of "sovereignty handover" we had over three years ago. What pure bullshit. Now when Maliki pushes back on these negotiations, we pull a move worthy of the Godfather by invading his home town and killing a cousin. American military in Iraq say it was an intel error. Have I said I hate these guys?

Iraqi officials outraged by U.S. raid in prime minister's hometown

Quote:

BAGHDAD, Iraq — Outraged Iraqi officials demanded an investigation into an early morning U.S. military raid Friday near the birthplace of Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki, saying the operation violated the terms of the handover of Karbala province to Iraqi security forces.

Karbala Gov. Oqeil al Khazaali said U.S. forces killed an unarmed civilian and arrested at least one person in the raid in the southern town of Janaja. The governor's brother, Hassanein al Khazaali, said late Friday that the Iraqi killed in the operation was a relative of the U.S.-backed prime minister.

The U.S. military command in Baghdad had no comment. Two senior aides to Maliki weren't available for comment; one was still in a meeting with the prime minister after midnight. The governor is said to belong to the prime minister's Dawa Party.

Iraqi officials in Karbala said the operation began at dawn Friday, when U.S. aircraft delivered dozens of American troops to the rural Shiite Muslim town of Janaja, which is populated mostly by members of the Maliki tribe.
. . . . .

Bush’s Loose Ends

Who is online