Mr. Buckshot wrote:
first of all all i said was ,what a nice picture,
Yes you did. I'll give you that.
Mr. Buckshot wrote:
i believe you are the one who took it out of context.
Perhaps this is a bit of projection on your part once again.
But, no, I don't think I took it out of context. Now mind you, that's a subjective analysis. I’m not sure though, that you really understand context.
I personally thought that it was a good example of how converting statistics to a graphic can mislead some folks. I was just trying to help you better understand how the GOP Propaganda Machine gets the job done and puts an air of legitimacy on it.
To your credit, many more educated people fall for this sophistry as well. Now don’t get all huffy. I’m not calling you uneducated. I’m just saying that people who have higher college degrees and stuff get sucked in by this bullshit of the “big red map.” The GOP misleads you on purpose. It’s all part of the game plan. Shhh! Don’t tell anyone, the GOP doesn’t want you to catch on. They’d like everyone to be ignorant. It makes it easier to trick everyone.
Mr. Buckshot wrote:
where did i try to lie.
You see, here you're reaching. I never said that you lied.
This is what I said.
Quote:
Okay, here's a lesson on how to lie with statistics.
Here's your map Mr. Buckshot.
It's a county by county map. Based on a simple formula. Whoever wins, wins it all.
It's not that simple. Don't forget that land mass doesn't vote!
Tell me, where did I say you lied? I said, "this is how to lie with statistics…” I was trying to educate you on how maps, like the one you so graciously posted, can be misleading.
This is how you repay me? By getting all huffy? I was trying to help by showing you how many of your “facts” are skewed by what you perceive as “liberal bias.” And that media bias is hardly liberal.
Who do you think decides what it is you read and do not read? You think it’s Liberals in the media, right? You’ve never considered that it’s the corporations who own the media, now have you? You think that it’s liberals who own all of those corporations? Do you think liberals put people like Mikey Savage on the air? Rush Limbaugh? Do you think liberals pay Annie Coulter or people like Billy O'Reilly?
Mr. Buckshot wrote:
thats about like everything you say
I do my best to elucidate some issues so that you can elevate yourself from your present misconceptions. And you act like I’m a bad guy. I’m sorry if that’s how you feel.
Mr. Buckshot wrote:
your just an angry little child.....BIG PHONY. GO BACK TO YOUR PORN SITES
There you go again, calling me a child. Do you still have those unaddressed issues? Do you feel like a child? I think that you’re projecting here, I mean, calling me a child and all.
Children don’t usually write contemplative and well thought out arguments meant to make you think. Children are usually more about evolving out of the Id. I think that you’re the one striking out here.
Now what’s this all about? You seem to be fixated on pornography. You know, putting this calling everyone children and the fixation on pornography together some folks may make the wrong assumptions about your psyche. You may want to work on that a bit. It doesn’t look good when you rant on about these sorts of things. Perhaps you should go back to ranting that everyone is picking on your postings and leave it at that. Leave out the children and the pornography; it’s distasteful.
Mr. Buckshot wrote:
man if a little old picture angers you that much its nowonder the truth blogs your mind so much.
What is it that makes you draw this fallacious conclusion? It takes more than a run of the mill wingnut to make me angry.
Mr. Buckshot you have shown that you have a tenuous, at best, grasp of reality. What makes you think that you have exclusive rights to declare what is, and what is not truth?