It is currently Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:46 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: PBS and its survival at stake
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 5:38 pm 
Offline
SuperMember!
SuperMember!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 6:19 pm
Posts: 2533
Excerpts from Democracy Now- June 16/ 05

The House Appropriations Committee is scheduled to vote today on drastic cuts to both the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Representative Ralph Regula's proposal would eliminate $100 million in federal funding to CPB and phase out the existance of PBS. For a look at media under fire, we turn to the National Conference on Media Reform.

....CPB is the US-tax payer funded agency that funds public media in this country. The proposal to cut funding was authored by Ohio Republican Representative Ralph Regula and would eliminate $100 million in federal funding to CPB. Regula’’s proposal also calls for all federal funding for PBS to be eliminated in two years... House appropriations subcommittee approved the bill last Thursday.
...Public Television Stations has termed the cuts "so drastic that they will severely impact every public television and radio station’’s ability to provide educational, cultural and informational programming in local communities and throughout the nation." Regula defended cuts as necessary to avoid reductions in federal support for vocational education, job and medical training.

Janine Jackson, program director of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting and the host of that organization’’s weekly radio show, Counterspin.

Malkia Cyril, director of the Youth Media Council.

JANINE JACKSON:.... work stands on the shoulders of a lot of people whose names we don't know and some whose names we may, like Liebling, Sinclair Lewis, I.F. Stone, George Seldes.... . a lot has certainly changed since FAIR was founded in 1986. Back then -- what's changed is most significantly in people's heads. Back then, as long ago as 1986, a lot of smart, politically active people thought of media as an ancillary issue. There was bad coverage, this or that issue but the media system itself was not considered a sort of contestable terrain... implicit sense that better media might flow naturally from some of the other social and economic goals that we wanted to achieve.
....changed now... think differently about media now. Remember how when you used to complain about something you saw on television or heard on the radio? Even people who agreed with you would tell you to just turn it off... don't hear that anymore... increasingly come to telling someone concerned about polluted air, ““Well, just stay inside.”” The impact and influence of media is undeniable.
...change, people both need to see that something is wrong and feel that they can do something about it. And I think we're at that point now with media, and we really should take a moment, metaphorically speaking, to appreciate the sea of change and the victory that that really represents.
... go forward, we keep asking ourselves, media reform for what? Do we want to break up dominant media conglomerations because it just sort of sounds better that there be like a smaller number of companies?
... not that... not an academic exercise. Bad media hurts real people. Better media would help real people... reform means gaining the power to speak and to be heard, and that means taking some of that power from the people who have it now.
...want truly democratic media because 45 million Americans don't have health insurance, lots of them think it's their fault. I want democratic media because black and brown kids go to jail because of what somebody read in the newspaper about super-predators. I want truly democratic media because public television just said that a family with lesbian mothers is unfit to be acknowledged, on the network that you and I pay for. And I want truly democratic media because if we had it, tens of thousands, perhaps 100,000 people who have died in Iraq might be alive today.

MALKIA CYRIL: - media reform is more than a fight for our media; it is a fight for our lives... we face today a Bush-led war on the world with hundreds of thousands of deaths and even more dangerous times ahead. .. media system represents crisis of democracy for the vast majority of population. Our communication rights are one of the many civil rights being rolled back, but not without a fight.

When we speak of media reform, the intentions of the (quote/unquote) ““framers””, and constitutional interpretations offer incomplete answers to the questions, what is a free press, and how is it guaranteed? We have heard that Jefferson and Madison understood the importance of an astute press in creating the foundation for a strong democracy and protection against elite rule. What remains both invisible and undeniable in the debate about U.S. media is the colonial context of its birth. As the founding fathers were documenting their concept of a free press, they were also building a slaveholding capitalist economy and a white nationalist politic that would entrench media policies and practices for centuries to come. Our current media system reproduces and maintains the colonial power relationships of its beginnings. Understanding the role media plays in creating and perpetuating structural racism and class oppression is not a secondary issue. It is central to building an effective and relevant movement for media reform that fundamentally transforms the U.S. system of communications.
By adopting raced, classed, and gendered lens to examine issues of media content, access and infrastructure, we can dispel three dangerous myths. The first myth is that the U.S. media used to be more democratic and has become less so over time. The fact is the U.S. media was born of colonial conquest and imperial intrusion, calling the democratic foundations of this press into direct question. For people of color, women, queer people and young folks, there has never been a free press, and without racial, economic and gender justice, there never will be.
The second myth is that communication rights are inherently individual civil rights guaranteed by citizenship. But what of the millions of undocumented people forced by economic and political conditions to emigrate to this country? What of the millions of incarcerated men, women and children whose citizenship rights are severed by confinement? What are the black, brown, female, queer and young people whose basic civil rights require ongoing movements to secure and even then are always in question? Where there is no real mechanism to guarantee civil rights, citizenship offers no protection or guarantee of communication rights.
The third and final myth we must dismantle is that we can achieve a free press without also working to end racism, sexism, and class oppression. Nothing could be further from the truth. Before the current trends of consolidation, re-regulation in the corporate interest and corporate control, the media was simultaneously a tool for civic engagement and a threat to the life and liberty of marginalized communities, and remains so today. In a free market society, organized by class, race and gender, no press can be truly free unless the people who use it and are impacted by it are also free.
...growing media justice movement, we at the Youth Media Council believes there are five strategic steps we can take to build an effective movement for media justice. One: connect media policy to racial justice. Two: use content battles, access fights and media accountability campaigns to engage new constituencies in the fight for progressive media policy. Three: organize and coordinate from the ground up. Four: use key political moments as strategic opportunities to advance our media policy agenda.
Five: In partnership with Media Alliance and others, we will use the upcoming broadcast license renewal process to challenge corporate control of our airwaves, increase accountability on local radio stations, confront structural racism in the licensing process, and lay the foundation for national opposition to Bush's plan. It is our turn now. It is our time.

Marginalized communities care about media reform because our lives and our freedom are at stake. We care because, from hip-hop to advertising, media corporations stereotype and exploit the culture of youth and people of color for profit, while those same corporations use our families to create and assemble the technology that makes them rich.
... our communities remain producers and consumers of a media system over which they have little to no control. But powerlessness is another dangerous myth we must dismantle. Together, we have the combined strategy and skill to dismantle and rebuild this media system. .... U.S. has used our media to export racism, sell war and destructively declare itself a singular superpower, the problem of the U.S. media is a problem for the entire world.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:50 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:11 am
Posts: 5620
Location: western New York
Excellent!

Media was somewhat better for a few years, but as you say, has never been fair or balanced. Guess that is why Fox uses those words--inside joke, eh?

But until we can deal with the entrenched prejudices of people in charge, nothing will change for the better.

Amazing how so many people can be totally missed by the radar, eh?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Blue Moon by Trent © 2007
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group