It is currently Sat Sep 20, 2014 7:04 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Fed Up in Louisiana
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 5:29 am 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:11 am
Posts: 5620
Location: western New York
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/051307E.shtml

Fed Up in Louisiana By Jonathan Capehart
The Washington Post

Saturday 12 May 2007

Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco (D) went off. Not in a girls fighting, "Hold my earrings!" kind of way. But in a blunt manner befitting a chief executive who endured the worst natural and engineering disaster in U.S. history, who continues to battle Washington for federal assistance, and who is not running for reelection.

We met in Blanco's imposing office on the fourth floor of the state Capitol in Baton Rouge on Wednesday. After watching her testify pleasantly before state legislative committees on behalf of her insurance reform package and for an expansion of Louisiana's Child Health Plus program, I was floored by her "bring it on" forthrightness as she talked about her dealings with Washington after Hurricane Katrina.

"I feel like in the last 3 1/2 years I have put in eight years' worth of work," Blanco said with an exasperated laugh. Her performance during Katrina was roundly criticized and her approval ratings in Louisiana, which rival those of President Bush nationally, never recovered. Rep. Bobby Jindal, a Louisiana Republican who wants to replace Blanco, had a 24-point lead over her in a January poll. Blanco denies that her weak standing played a role in her March announcement that she would not seek a second term.

When I asked the governor if she were as baffled as I by the level of resistance in Congress and in the White House to helping Louisiana with post-Hurricane Katrina recovery (the continuing refusal to waive the onerous 10 percent match required by the Federal Emergency Management Agency comes to mind), Blanco let 'er rip.

"It's all political," she began. "You know, this country's run on politics. But when a disaster comes that is not what you expect, you expect a human reaction, not a political reaction. And I will tell you, there's a void," Blanco drawled, "a total void of human response. And it's extremely discouraging as an American citizen. It makes me angry and extremely disappointed."


So the torturous problems of Louisiana goes on. There is a very long thread from SmirkingChimp on the disaster. It has pieces from the time and first person observations. It was always a favorite--so very human...

Smirky has preserved it. The URLs may change because he hasn't finished his preservation project yet, but these are the pages of the thread.

Omnibus "News of New Orleans" thread:

posts 1 through 250 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/10

posts 251 through 500 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/11

posts 501 to 750 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/14

posts 751 to 1000 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/15

posts 1001 to 1250 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/16

posts 1251 to 1500 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/17

posts 1501 to 1750 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/18

posts 1751 to 2000 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/19

posts 2001 to 2250 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/20

posts 2251 to 2500 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/21

posts 2501 to 2750 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/22

posts 2751 to 2880 http://www.muggedbywhores.com/node/23

I don't expect anyone to read any of this, we are all too busy. But I did want to put it on here in memorial for the people who lived through this unbelievable tragedy.

_________________
Libertarianism

Libertarianism Makes You Stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 6:01 am 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:11 am
Posts: 5620
Location: western New York
One post from the thread mentioned above:

Posted: 2005-09-06 03:40

The following is an Opinion Piece from Haaretz (an Israeli Newspaper):

Let the poor die

By Yitzhak Laor

Why is it that broadcasters stood in the wind, in raincoats, and nevertheless we did not know the dimensions of the disaster when it occurred? What became clear to us in the days after Hurricane Katrina was first of all the deception called live broadcast from the site of the event.

For two decades now, we have become accustomed to digesting information that is only a false image of information. This is not "new," of course. When the United States destroyed Iraq, it allowed the television broadcasters to be only in certain places and to give us an image of the overall picture.

Along came the hurricane, and it testified to the fact that filming does not do what a thousand words do, and a thousand words do not do what scientific forecasts and political analyses and economists' numbers should do. The boring and not always dramatic truth cannot be transmitted well in a live broadcast, not even with the help of satellite maps and charismatic weathermen who explain the exact location of the eye of the storm.

Numbers, especially those of weak populations, buses, readied airplanes, relevant airports - in other words, planning - remain outside the general picture. Moreover, planning today belongs exclusively to economic firms. Only they know, more or less, how to calculate, in the name of profit, the number of people who live in a given area and how many of them are likely to purchase a new product, or watch television, or buy gas for their cars. This does not come across in any live broadcast, because there is no one who has an interest in general information like this. It's inevitable that a developed society built only on economic interests will eventually arrive at a situation like this, of government failure, as was revealed in the United States. If there are no people with economic interests who are interested in preventing a natural disaster, it is not prevented.

Most of the experts on climate know how responsible the developed countries, and particularly the United States, are for the destruction of nature, how they are heating up the globe and to what extent these hurricanes are connected to the warming of the oceans near the African continent. Let Africa be covered in desert, they say in the large business circles in the United States, especially those that voted for President George W. Bush, among other reasons in order to empty the Kyoto convention of content.

Does anyone imagine that there is a difference, as far as they are concerned, between the blacks of the American South and the blacks of Africa? Does anyone imagine there is a difference, as far as they are concerned, between poor blacks and poor whites? Ever since Ronald Reagan became president of the United States, politics in the West has been flourishing under the motto attributed to former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher: There is no society, there are only individuals. This was not only the motto for the dismantling of the welfare state.

Innumerable ideologists have arisen since then and have spoken about the free economy: It does not benefit only the wealthy, they have promised, but "ultimately" it will benefit everyone. Beyond the daily disappointment of hopes, a gradual destruction has been carried out - which has now come to the front of the stage in the United States - of the functions of the modern state: the provision of water and electricity, health, education, culture, even prisons; everything has been put up for sale to the highest bidder and promises profits to investors and minimum expenditures for the taxpayers.

From within all this, the vision of Robinson Crusoe has been reborn: a society in which no one is responsible for anyone else. In the South, where the struggles for riding on "integrated buses" marked the beginning of the struggle for equality in the United States, the world has discovered that there are no buses, there are no trains, there are no public services. The state mechanism, which had been the greatest democratic achievement of all - not the army, but rather the public services - was depicted in all the temples of the new religion as one of the attributes of the Devil, who must be overcome. What about the poor? Let them die.

There is no need to be a villain in order to imagine senior people at the huge real estate firms replanning the South, a huge potential for tourism, thanks to the climate and the beaches. The evacuation of the population has, after all, been done "naturally." How far is this scenario from a possible explanation of the indifference that preceded the storm, from the great delay in the help? It is not far.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I printed the entire piece because the link to the origional did not work.

How many people still care about those displaced from New Orleans?

_________________
Libertarianism

Libertarianism Makes You Stupid


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Blue Moon by Trent © 2007
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group