It is currently Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:15 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:23 am 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 11:46 pm
Posts: 14444
Location: NC
I found this link at Michael Kwiatkowski's forum LIBERAL PRIDE. While it's a January article, it is even more timely now as we all scramble to get our tax returns prepared by the April 15th deadline. Do we need further proof that, even when the Bush administration throws us alms, those at the higher echolon of income still benefit more?

[url=]Missing the target
The Bush tax rebate fails on effectiveness and fairness criteria


Many policy makers and economists now agree that an economic stimulus package is needed to offset the slowdown in the U.S. economy. The Bush administration has floated a $145 billion plan, with $100 billion devoted to a tax rebate and the remainder earmarked for businesses. Final details have yet to be formally announced, but indications are that the president will propose a temporary elimination of the 10% federal income tax bracket. While such a rebate can help boost lagging demand by putting more money in consumers' pockets, the White House plan suffers from very poor targeting, and thus fails on two critical criteria: efficiency and equity.

As the Chart below reveals, over 70% of the rebate goes to the top 40% (income above $47,000) and less than 10% reaches the bottom 40% (income below $27,000). According the analysis by the Brookings-Urban Institute Tax Policy Center, 55.9 million households get no rebate at all from the plan, in part because many households pay no federal income tax. Most of these households, however, do pay other forms of taxes, such as payroll taxes on their earnings.

The economic research on effective stimulus is quite clear on this point: there is a greater bang-for-the-buck from rebates targeted at lower-income households than higher-income ones. As the Congressional Budget Office put it in a recent report:[PDF] "Lower-income households are more likely to be credit constrained and more likely to be among those with the highest propensity to spend. Therefore, policies aimed at lower-income households tend to have greater stimulative effects." Given the well-documented increase in income inequality in recent years, excluding low-income households from the rebate also fails on the criterion of fairness.



"Behind every great fortune lies a great crime."
Honore de Balzac

"Democrats work to help people who need help.
That other party, they work for people who don't need help.
That's all there is to it."

~Harry S. Truman

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Blue Moon by Trent © 2007
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group