It is currently Sun Apr 20, 2014 11:20 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: KERRY: Fit for Command
PostPosted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 10:19 am 
Offline
Involved
Involved
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:07 am
Posts: 20
Location: Alamance County, NC.
:arrow: To call Senator John Kerry a traitor for opposing the Vietnam war maligns millions of Americans who protested the Vietnam war in the 1960s-70s. Not only that, but it directly contradicts the FBI's own files on John Kerry's anti-war activities following his distinguished service in the U.S. Navy in Vietnam.

The FBI files, which were recently released, describe Kerry as a "voice of moderation" in the anti-war movement. This was the FBI of J. Edgar Hoover, the same FBI that infiltrated anti-war groups and pushed them toward militancy, and their conclusion was that Kerry was a "moderate. Not a flag-burning Communist who went to North Vietnam to pledge his allegiance to the Communists.

Instead, Kerry was a very patriotic American who went before Congress and testified that the war was a lost cause, and that Americans were dying everyday for a war that two presidents had seen as not winnable. The war also happened to have been unjustified and unjust. The U.S.A. obliterated over a million Vietnamese in order that the "dominoes" of Cambodia and Laos would not fall to the International Communist Conspiracy. President Dwight "Ike" Eisenhower announced that free and direct elections would be held in Vietnam in 1956. Those elections never took place, but within a generation, almost two million Vietnamese, untold thousands of Laotians, and hundreds of thousands of Cambodians would be dead, alongside 58,000 American soldiers.

So John Kerry is a traitor for fighting bravely and admirably for his country, while Bush is an American hero for joining the National Guard to avoid being sent to Vietnam and also shirking his duty while in that service. Only a warped logic could produce that view. G W Bush recently said that "Kerry isn't fit to be "Commander in Chief"." Considering the fact that Kerry knows what war is like and also how terrible war is from having served our country in Vietnam, I think that makes him more fit than Bush to be "Commander in Chief". :)




Quote:
"Never, never, never give up!" ~ Sir Winston Churchill


http://www.johnkerry.com http://www.missionnotaccomplished.com

_________________
MOPEDER


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: mopeder
PostPosted: Sun Sep 26, 2004 7:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 11:46 pm
Posts: 14442
Location: NC
Mopeder...excellent post!

:D

If I've not invited you yet, please come over to www.ragereport.com and register to post there, too. It's a very active board, with a chatroom, and many forums to discuss different topics.

I'm often back and forth between TVNL and RR because they're the best, IMHO.. :wink:

Catherine

_________________
Image

"Behind every great fortune lies a great crime."
Honore de Balzac

"Democrats work to help people who need help.
That other party, they work for people who don't need help.
That's all there is to it."

~Harry S. Truman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: No, Bush isn't fit to command
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 1:44 pm 
Offline
Involved
Involved
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:07 am
Posts: 20
Location: Alamance County, NC.
Quote:
"A political candidate who jumps to conclusions without knowing the facts is not a person you want as your commander in chief." ~ George W. Bush (10/27/04)


With George W. Bush, we have a man who failed in two businesses of his own. On taking office, he inherited a huge surplus and turned it into the largest deficit in history.

He is the first president since Herbert Hoover to lose jobs in the national economy.

Iraq is a disaster. He talks tough on terrorism but leaves our chemical plants unguarded and unprotected from terrorists and our shipping containers unscanned by any bomb-searching devices.

Instead of spending the money available to protect us, he uses it to give his contributors (billionaires) a large tax cut.

And he's tough on terrorism? When he walks with a swagger and talks tough, how many terrorists does he scare?

He doesn't even like to read in order to study the issues involved. How can he possibly know what's going on?

He is further threatening one of our oldest and most successful institutions, Social Security, with a "privatization" scheme that will no doubt be as disasterous as his other initiatives.

The only reason he has given for his re-election is in his attempted smear of his opponent, claiming John Kerry is unfit while offering more of the same disasters.

Bush has been proven over and over again to be totally incompetent and unfit for the job. His re-election would be a catastrophe unparalleled in our history.

_________________
MOPEDER


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Blue Moon by Trent © 2007
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group