Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths
Page 1 of 1

Author:  CB_Brooklyn [ Sun May 11, 2008 9:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths

Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No-Plane-Theory* Myths

by CB_Brooklyn

(mirrored @

From the moment people thought that planes crashed in the World Trade Center, the brainwashing had begun.

The “official” account of Boeing 767s striking the North and South Towers, at 400+MPH and 500+MPH respectively, became glued in peoples’ minds as “fact” because of the “tee-vee”. Good ol’ tee-vee. We all trust the media.

Even in 1938, when Orson Welles directed a special Halloween radio broadcast of the novel “War of the Worlds”, millions of Americans believed Martians were invading earth. Everyone trusts the media! (As a side note, I’d like to advertise a new article by Andrew Johnson: “Mars Anomalies”)

It should come to no surprise how the media affects peoples’ minds and our culture, and the media’s reporting of 9/11 is no exception.

The 9/11 coverup perpetrators had their deceptive propaganda well planned. With their total control over the media they successfully conditioned most into believing their “19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims” story. People were overwhelmed; their brains saturated with the propaganda.

November 10, 2001 - George W Bush brainwashes the world into thinking the idea of “inside job” is crazy: ”Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty.” ... 110-3.html

But the propaganda didn’t stop there. The coverup perps, the experts they are, knew some people would see through their “boxcutter” deception, so they crafted an alternate propaganda… specifically targeting those already suspicious of the “official” story.

Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." ... ocracy.htm

This alternate propaganda is promoted by government plants within the “truth movement”, along with its fabricated evidence (such as molten metal). Of course, the media carefully publicize this “evidence” as a “wacky conspiracy theory”…

November 14, 2005 - Tucker Carlson brainwashes the world into thinking the idea of an “inside job” theory is offensive. Steven Jones promotes the “alternate propaganda”:

Yet, the coverup perpetrators use ridicule to keep the “REAL” version hidden…

December 6, 2006 - Steven E Jones brainwashes the 9/11 “truth movement” into thinking the idea of directed energy weapons and no planes is “crazy disinfo”: “Of late, [Jim Fetzer] refers often to his association now with Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds. These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.”

Jones is one of many in and around the “truth movement” associated with Los Alamos where Directed Energy Weapons are researched. See here to learn how the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media. Jones also suppressed free energy research in ways that mirror his 9/11 coverup:

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
By CB_Brooklyn ... &Itemid=60

Timeline of Events Involving Steve Jones, Crockett Grabbe and Steve Koonin
By Russ Gerst ... &Itemid=60

If no-planes/TV-Fakery were “crazy disinfo”, why didn’t the media use it to discredit the “truth movement”? Here’s a video of Dr Morgan Reynolds on FOX News:

Certainly if no-planes/TV-Fakery were “crazy disinfo”, the media would have invited Dr Reynolds back. Why didn’t they?

On top of that, why didn’t the media report Reynolds’ or Wood’s court cases, represented by Attorney Jerry Leaphart?

Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower. ... deral_case

Docket No. 1:07-cv-04612-GBD
Title: Dr. Morgan Reynolds ex rel. USA vs. Science Applications International Corp. et al.
Venue: United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Judge: George B. Daniels

Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.

Docket No. 1:07-cv-03314-GBD
Title: Dr. Judy Wood ex rel. USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al.
Venue: United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Judge: George B. Daniels

UPDATE!!! While composing this article the author became aware of the following:

New York Times
“For Engineer, a Cloud of Litigation After 9/11”
By Jim Dwyer
February 23, 2008

The relevant quote is as follows (emphasis added):

”… one man has sued on behalf of the United States, claiming that Mr. Gilsanz is part of a vast conspiracy to cover up the truth about 9/11, including the “so-called building failures.” The lawsuit maintains that exotic weaponry actually destroyed the buildings, and that the airplanes were mass psychological trickery.”

Wood and Reynolds have filed two separate lawsuits.

No mention of Wood/Reynolds/Leaphart’s names in the Times article.


Let us review…

The media (i.e. MSNBC):
promote the “official” version as “the truth”
ridicule the “alternate” version as the “offensive wacky conspiracy theory”
shun the “REAL” version and court cases

Plants in the ”truth movement” (i.e. Steven Jones):
promote the “alternate” version as “the truth”
ridicule the “REAL” version as “offensive wacky conspiracy theory”

We can now understand why many “truthers” shy away from no-planes/TV-Fakery. Seems the 9/11 coverup perps tricked the “truth movement” with a well orchestrated plan of deception! Will these theories really “damage” the “truth movement”, or has the movement merely been tricked into thinking so?

Many “truthers” often wonder why the mainstream media hasn’t broken the “inside job” story yet. The reason is simple: The 9/11 perps have not been exposed. (Check the “Suppression Timeline” linked above.)

Only after the real 9/11 perpetrators are widely exposed with the media break!

Will “truthers” finally start promoting no-planes/TV-Fakery? If the “truth movement” can’t admit their mistakes, why should the average person? People will simply continue believing what they feel most comfortable with: the “boxcutter” story. They don’t care about the evidence. Why should they? After all, the “truth movement” doesn’t. Or do they???

How many “truthers” have looked at the no-planes/TV-Fakery evidence lately… evidence that anyone can understand?

Below you will find a ton of evidence. Look it through… you maybe surprised!


This article is quite extensive. A few points covered:

• Learn of the 1999 Washington Post article detailing the military's hologram project.
• Learn of the NYPD official who said the South Tower strike "looked like an evil magician's trick".
• Learn of the FDNY official who said “I never actually saw a plane hit the building. I never saw that. I saw it on television, but I never saw it while I was standing there”.
• Learn that very few people reported seeing airplanes, and even fewer reported hearing them.
• Learn of the mainstream media articles detailing how the military and TV Networks broadcast fake footage to deceive the public.
• Watch the ABC video of Peter Jennings. He knew the airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC played the clip back in slow motion.

Click here for full article: ... &Itemid=60

Author:  Catherine [ Sun May 11, 2008 9:54 pm ]
Post subject: 

Welcome to the board, CB...and thanks for posting all that information. I'll have to take few minutes to read it but I wanted to let you know that we're glad you're here and hope to see you posting often.


Author:  CB_Brooklyn [ Sun May 11, 2008 10:08 pm ]
Post subject: 

Thanks Catherine. I didn't know TVNewsLies had a forum until recently, but have heard of the site long ago...

Author:  Catherine [ Sun May 11, 2008 10:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

We're hoping the TVNL FORUMS will become more active with the new website design. With all the interesting material that is on the main page, it's very easy to overlook the forum link.

If you'd go HERE to introduce yourself to the other members, I'm sure they will want to extend their welcomes, too.

Author:  rooster [ Mon May 12, 2008 5:07 am ]
Post subject: 

welcome cb.

1st i've heard of the fake news footage.

but on the otherhand i was immediately suspicious of how 3 buildings could fall perfectly into thier own structural footprint. for me they looked as though they were brought down via controled demolition.

too many other questions surround the implausibility of the OFFICIAL story of events on 9/11.

the truth is out there but not on the msm.

Author:  CB_Brooklyn [ Tue May 13, 2008 2:27 am ]
Post subject: 

well, not really a "controlled demolition", more like how Dr Judy Wood says: "poof"!


Author:  lefty [ Tue May 13, 2008 10:12 am ]
Post subject: 

There are tons of things that immediately didn't make sense to me.
-How come after the first day or so, the "attacks" on the pentagon are/were pretty much never mentioned again? Why is everything only focused on NY?
-How does someone make a cell phone call in a plane that far up in the air? (Talking about the PA plane dude who supposedly called his mom and identified himself to her...)
-How on earth did NO ONE notice these 3 planes not staying on their actual course and do anything about this divergence?
-How come no one in MSM ever mentions/mentioned PNAC and their clear and obvious connection/planning of the whole "pearl harbor like" attacks?
-How come Bill Kristol is still able to be booked on tv shows and is never questioned about his nefarious involvement in PNAC? (Wait, he has been on the Daily show a bunch of times and I'm fairly sure John Stewart is the only person on TV who has actually called him out on the pnac shit...)

Anyway, the longer I sit here the more questions I have...

Author:  rooster [ Wed May 14, 2008 5:21 am ]
Post subject: 


how is it that the most protected airspace (dc) on the face of the planet was left completely unprotected well over an hour after the bullshit in new york.?

way too many questions about 9/11 that simply do NOT add up or make sense.

and the problem is the coporately controlled msm no longer asks ANY questions.

the OFFICIAL story was conveniently packaged and sold to the sheeple and they readily drank the koolaid.

Author:  Catherine [ Wed May 14, 2008 8:40 am ]
Post subject: 

Well, gee whiz, rooster...don't you know the sheeple would much rather be given entertainment "news?" Don't you know they're more interested in which Hollywood star is having ONE MORE baby, or what Paris H. is doing, or who is Dancing with the Stars? :wink: And the media are more interested in ratings. There is no more journalism within the msm, although Olberman at MSNBC is close.

We get more info from Comedy Central than from any of the so-called news stations. That is rather sad, isn't it?

BUT, we do have the internets! :P

Author:  dori [ Sat May 17, 2008 5:11 am ]
Post subject: 

Not to change the subject, but are Directed Energy Weapons what brought Paul Wellstone's plane down?

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group