Purple Tang wrote:
"Thoughtful" - an interesting adjective when describing the 9/11 demolition. But imagine if I and II would have fallen sideways.
I suspect the plan was to hit Congess with the 4th plane and implement martial law.
I found myself thinking about this a couple of weeks ago.
I'm wondering if it is possible that flight 93 was supposed to hit WTC 7. I mean think about it, WTC 7 was imploded, there is no doubt about it. This tells me that they were expecting significant damage to occur to the building and there is no way they could count on debris from towers 1 and 2 to do enough damage to justify a complete free fall collapse.
If flight 93 would have hit it, to their minds, 3 buildings, all hit by jets, all collapsing the same way. Nice and neat, they can use the same explanation for collapse on every building.
But that's not what happened.
At some point they lost control of flight 93 and they had to shoot it down. (Yes, it was shot down)
They had a problem. Building 7 was still standing, rigged to be brought down.....it had to come down, so the decision was made to "Pull it".
If a plane would have hit building 7, they would have been able to point at all 3 buildings and this would have been their excuse, their reason for 7 to collapse as it did.
Instead they totally ignored building 7 hoping that no one would notice. They had to. Even with the way they attempt to twist physics, they could not lie their way into any possible reason as to why building 7 imploded upon itself. No plane, small fires...total and complete collapse.
Of course this is all just supposition on my part. You could very well be correct. Unless someone becomes "enlightened" and decides to change their ways thus coming forward with what really happened, we will never know.