It is currently Sun Oct 26, 2014 4:02 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Iraq Occupation: How Many Lives Per Gallon?
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2005 10:02 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 11:46 pm
Posts: 14444
Location: NC
Dennis Rahkonen: 'Endless Iraq occupation: How many lives per gallon?'

By Dennis Rahkonen, Online Journal

The Terri Schiavo affair and the pope's passing served a useful diversionary purpose for Washington warmongers. Let's get our attention back to the empire-building oil grab that we, the American people, have an abiding duty to end.

Now into the Iraq fiasco's third year, it's admitted there were never any weapons of mass destruction.

We also know George W. Bush is not the son who'll tote the gun, just as he hasn't attended any funerals of American kids he needlessly sent off to die.

Perpetual conflict? Endless occupation? How many lives per gallon?

As of this writing, nearly 1,600 of our troops have been killed and many thousands more severely wounded. Untold numbers require emotional treatment for post-traumatic stress. Tomorrow that grim tally will increase.



More than 100,000 Iraqi civilians no longer breathe the bracing air, because their souls have been liberated from their bodies, courtesy of Donald Rumsfeld's Pentagon. That's almost double our country's loss in Vietnam.

Five billion dollars are squandered on Iraq each month, added to another $134 billion in tax cuts slated for the wealthy. Got unattended potholes in your street, and neighborhood schools being boarded up? Is your quality of daily life crumbling? Do the math.

Just as two wrongs don't make a right, extending a singularly abysmal wrong doesn't miraculously transform it into something worthy.

If anyone on the face of this planet can tell antiwar activists how Bush's unprovoked, illegal, immoral invasion of Iraq substantively differs from Mussolini's rape of Ethiopia in 1935, please reveal what they're missing.

Try to convince them that staying in Iraq beyond any point past yesterday is either wise or decent.

Sleeping down the hall in our households tonight will be children still in school who are oblivious to the wanton horror half a world away.

But the no-exit reality of what neocolonialist reactionaries plainly intend for Iraq and the surrounding area means that, in a few fleeting years, they may well be permanently sleeping under Middle Eastern sand.

We didn't raise our beloved kids to be wasted in greedy corporatists' acquisitive bloodbaths.

For far too long we've allowed a crass manipulation of the 9/11 attack, combined with false patriotism and our own craven unwillingness to challenge what we know to be terribly wrong, to keep us quiet. Our silence has enabled and facilitated an awful human catastrophe.

To a large extent, we ourselves are responsible for a despicable, damned war that virtually everyone in the entire world opposes. Except to a decisively visible degree in Everytown, USA.

All that has to change.

Both in moral terms and in a broad array of material aspects, Bush's folly is flushing our country down the tubes.

A single insistence emanating from the American heartland must begin to echo loudly through corridors of misguided power:

"NO MORE!"

I lived through the Vietnam era, attending my first antiwar rally while bearing a homemade placard declaring: "44,000. Enough!" That's how many Americans had perished up to that time.

Over subsequent years—while a stubborn sector of our conservative citizenry continued to believe in outrageous lies and myths—that death toll soared, finally finding its end in the last name chisled on a sprawling, polished-granite memorial in D.C.

Visit that monument. Gaze at its surface until your focus shifts from the 58,000 names to your own reflected face. Feel the tug at your heart and that awful sensation in the pit of your stomach.

Then try to imagine what a future Iraq War commemoration etched in massive stone will look like. Think of those you know who are presently serving, and those likely to do so before long.

Will it be larger than the existing wall? Will it bear even more names?

Finally, reflect upon the thinly disguised deceit and insincerity you see as George Bush issues pitiful platitudes on the televised evening news.

Ponder the preposterous absurdity of "democracy" being supposedly built for a foreign populace under constant threat of an occupying superpower's ongoing shock and awe and Abu Ghraib style repression. People who can summarily be blown away or tortured for manifesting true, independent desires are, obviously, not free at all. Hitler said he was bringing liberation to the lands he conquered, too.

These inescapable facts must give rise to a Vietnam-era level of radicalization here at home.

A full repeat of that period's mass resistance is clearly called for. From floodtides of protest in the streets to soldiers refusing to fight, with every imaginable tactic in between, the American people must stand up.

Or get shot down . . . over succeeding generations, in a series of rich man's dirty wars for which Iraq is but the bloody, interminable "model."


Dennis Rahkonen of Superior, Wisconsin, was a regional coordinator for the nationwide People's Coalition for Peace and Justice during the early '70s.

Link:
Reprinted from Online Journal:
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/
050305Rahkonen/050305rahkonen.html

Reference: http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u ... mi_ea/iraq



Catherine

_________________
Image

"Behind every great fortune lies a great crime."
Honore de Balzac

"Democrats work to help people who need help.
That other party, they work for people who don't need help.
That's all there is to it."

~Harry S. Truman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2005 6:48 pm 
Offline
SuperMember!
SuperMember!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 1485
Location: Left Coast
Where are the bush excusers to refute this piece? Are they all hiding under their rocks playing with themselves again? When will those same war mongering supporters of the bush invasion of iraq actually participate in it by doing the patriotic thing and enlisting? When Hell freezes over? Or when they are drafted, will they opt for the don't ask don't tell option?

:twisted:

_________________
My Pep Talk For Lefties and Lurkers


I cannot teach anybody anything,
I can only make them think.

~~ Socrates


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2005 9:15 pm 
Offline
SuperMember!
SuperMember!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 6:43 am
Posts: 1015
November 29, 2003

Obnoxious

One of the more shallow memes of the current war goes like this:

"Isn't it shameful that President Bush hasn't attended the funerals of very many of the service men who have fallen in this war?"

Anyone who thinks very hard about this knows this is an incredibly shallow criticism. Otherwise, the great Generals and Presidents of history, such as Roosevelt, Eisenhower, MacAurther, Patton, Lincoln, and Grant would have never done anything with their time except attend funerals.

Still, if you need to know what history shows, then ask a veteran. As Gulf War veteran John Cole notes, no President has ever regularly attended military funerals.

That's right. Franklin Roosevelt didn't. Harry Truman didn't. Dwight Eisenhower didn't. John F. Kennedy didn't. Lyndon Johnson didn't. Richard Nixon didn't. Ford and Carter didn't. Reagan attended more than most Presidents ever did, but still usually didn't. Bush the Elder usually didn't. Clinton did a couple of times, but mostly didn't.

What if we go all the way back to Presidents like Abraham Lincoln, or George Washington? Turns out that they didn't either.

Why? Because if they did, they would do almost nothing else.

The President of the United States is the leader of hundreds of millions of people. Part of his job is to command hundreds of thousands of people in the military. The next time you vote for a President, I hope you think very hard about that, because that's one of the most important things any President ever does.

But one thing he generally doesn't do is attend the funeral of every fallen service man. Mind you, a good one wishes he could attend every such funeral. A good one feels it like a knife in his gut every time a soldier falls. But he can't be there every time a soldier falls. He just can't.

If you don't understand that, then, to be blunt, you lack maturity
link:http://www.deanesmay.com/archives/005577.html

_________________
I believe that God has planted in every heart the desire to live in freedom.
George W. Bush
DESTROY THE QURAN OR BE DESTROYED BY IT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 07, 2005 9:17 pm 
Offline
SuperMember!
SuperMember!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 6:43 am
Posts: 1015
November 29, 2003

Obnoxious

One of the more shallow memes of the current war goes like this:

"Isn't it shameful that President Bush hasn't attended the funerals of very many of the service men who have fallen in this war?"

Anyone who thinks very hard about this knows this is an incredibly shallow criticism. Otherwise, the great Generals and Presidents of history, such as Roosevelt, Eisenhower, MacAurther, Patton, Lincoln, and Grant would have never done anything with their time except attend funerals.

Still, if you need to know what history shows, then ask a veteran. As Gulf War veteran John Cole notes, no President has ever regularly attended military funerals.

That's right. Franklin Roosevelt didn't. Harry Truman didn't. Dwight Eisenhower didn't. John F. Kennedy didn't. Lyndon Johnson didn't. Richard Nixon didn't. Ford and Carter didn't. Reagan attended more than most Presidents ever did, but still usually didn't. Bush the Elder usually didn't. Clinton did a couple of times, but mostly didn't.

What if we go all the way back to Presidents like Abraham Lincoln, or George Washington? Turns out that they didn't either.

Why? Because if they did, they would do almost nothing else.

The President of the United States is the leader of hundreds of millions of people. Part of his job is to command hundreds of thousands of people in the military. The next time you vote for a President, I hope you think very hard about that, because that's one of the most important things any President ever does.

But one thing he generally doesn't do is attend the funeral of every fallen service man. Mind you, a good one wishes he could attend every such funeral. A good one feels it like a knife in his gut every time a soldier falls. But he can't be there every time a soldier falls. He just can't.

If you don't understand that, then, to be blunt, you lack maturity
link:http://www.deanesmay.com/archives/005577.html

_________________
I believe that God has planted in every heart the desire to live in freedom.
George W. Bush
DESTROY THE QURAN OR BE DESTROYED BY IT


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Blue Moon by Trent © 2007
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group