Examples Of Weakness
July 19th Tehran Times reports the thought crisis of IRGC Major General Jazayeri--
 ..."the UN Security Council issued several resolutions during the eight-year Sacred Defense..., but Tehran rejected them because they had not taken into consideration Iran’s demands."
 Chief among Iran's demands was its " request that the aggressor country [Iraq] be punished...."
 Finally, even though "Resolution 598 did not take into account Iran’s request that the aggressor country [Iraq] be punished, Iran...accepted the resolution...."
 "Iraq’s war against Iran was followed by Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990, which led to the United States’ [The Superpower's] attack on Iraq in 1991...."
 Thus "proving Iran was correct in demanding that the aggressor should have been punished, he [ Jazayeri] stated."
The Major General claims Iran did the right thing in the first place and then The Superpower followed up by doing the right thing (because Iraq did the wrong thing) --and all that proves Iran had done the right thing in the first place!
If that's not prettifying The Superpower, what is?
ACTUALLY, THE SUPERPOWER EMBOLDENED IRAQ TO ATTACK IRAN BY PROMISING IRAQ IT COULD HAVE KUWAIT AS A REWARD.
Which shows the real aggressor was The Superpower.
THE SUPERPOWER'S ATTACK ON IRAQ PROVED IT WAS --AND IS-- A DOUBLE-DEALER.
See for yourself:
‘UN emboldened Iraq to invade Kuwait’
July 19, 2011 http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=244312
July 21st Tehran Times reports the confusion crisis of MP Akbarian, one of the five MPs who want Salehi quizzed in the Majlis.
Hamshahri newspaper interviewed Akbarian:
"Asked about the reason behind...calling for Salehi to be questioned, Akbarian raised some questions:
 Where we are in the Islamic awakening current occurring in Islamic Middle Eastern countries?
 What is our diplomacy in this regard?
 What role do we intend to play?"
The first question presupposes Iran is in the awakening current. It is not.
The second question presupposes Iran's present diplomacy has regard for the awakening current. It does not.
The third question presupposes Salehi intends to play a role in the awakening current. Not in, --against the current.
Let's drop such confused questions and view the current situation as it is:
Iran is buddying up to Superpower puppet Afghanistan
Iran is buddying up to Superpower puppet Iraq
Iran is buddying up to Superpower puppet Pakistan.
This buddying up serves the policy of:
Iranian expansion rather than the policy of Islamic revolution
Iranian detente with The Superpower rather than the policy of Islamic revolution
Iranian peaceful coexistence with Superpower puppet Israel rather than the policy of Islamic revolution.
What else does such a policy dictate?
Buddying up to The Superpower's NATO followers by
 claiming their puppet counter-revolutionaries in Libya are part of the Islamic Awakening
 talking up a fake peace plan under Algerian [= French] guidance.
Sending condolences for traitor Karzai.
See for yourself:
 Persian Press Review / Leading articles
Hamshahri has conducted an interview, etc
July 21, 2011 http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=244445
 'Libya, Yemen dictators doomed to fall'
Boroujerdi, chairman of Iran's Majlis Committee on National Security and Foreign Policy
Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:4PMhttp://www.presstv.ir/detail/189803.html
 Iran top MP condemns Afghanistan terror attack
"I [Boroujerdi, Head of Iranian Parliament National Security and Foreign Policy Commission]...express my condolences about the assassination of the Head of Kandahar Provincial Council Chief Mr. Ahmed Wali Karzai...."http://isna.ir/isna/NewsView.aspx?ID=Ne ... 405&Lang=E