It is currently Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:50 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Greenspan: Social Security is not in 'crisis'
PostPosted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 12:06 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 8:50 pm
Posts: 184
Sue Kirchhoff
USA Today
Feb. 18, 2005 12:00 AM

WASHINGTON - Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said Thursday that Social Security is not in "crisis" as President Bush has declared but emphasized that Congress must quickly address future funding problems in the program and far larger shortfalls in Medicare.

In remarks to a House committee, the bank chief offered a sunny, short-term economic outlook with expanding business activity and low inflation. But he said the long-term picture is clouded by an aging population that will strain Social Security and Medicare and slow economic growth.

Greenspan said lawmakers must get a handle on the problems before baby boomers start retiring in 2008. To help control deficits, he said, any future tax cuts should be offset elsewhere in the budget.
advertisement


"The first priority is to assure that deficits are under control," Greenspan said, warning that major changes are needed to restrain increases in budget deficits. The Congressional Budget Office estimates Social Security and Medicare could soak up 26 percent of the economy by 2050.

In his testimony, Greenspan also suggested Congress limit the growth of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. "(By) enabling these institutions to increase in size," he said, "we are placing the total financial system of the future at a substantial risk."

But the focus of the hearing was Social Security, which Greenspan said is not in crisis. "Crisis to me usually refers to something which is going to happen tomorrow or is on the edge of going into a very serious change," he said. "That is not going to happen."

Greenspan said private accounts funded with a portion of the 12.4 percent Social Security payroll tax would not address the program's solvency. But they could move the program to a pre-funded basis while providing a sense of ownership, and possibly transferable wealth, to individuals lower down the economic ladder "who have had to struggle with very little capital."

However, he reiterated that higher government borrowing to finance the move to private accounts poses a risk of higher deficits and interest rates.

Bush's plan would let workers under 55 divert a portion of Social Security taxes into voluntary accounts to invest in stocks and bonds. The White House has said the plan would cost $754 billion over the first 10 years, though other estimates are far higher.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/ ... pan18.html


-Eva


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 3:11 am 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:11 am
Posts: 5620
Location: western New York
Everything these people touch costs more than they say it will. And that doesn't account for the things they don't even bother to budget for such as this war (and any new ones they are planning).

They are actually working to bankrupt our country--isn't that a wonderfully 'moral' plan?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2005 3:43 am 
Offline
SuperMember!
SuperMember!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 1:53 am
Posts: 2541
Location: Illinois
dori wrote:
Everything these people touch costs more than they say it will. And that doesn't account for the things they don't even bother to budget for such as this war (and any new ones they are planning).

They are actually working to bankrupt our country--isn't that a wonderfully 'moral' plan?


I have come to believe that the goal of the neo-cons is actually to bankrupt our country. Why not? Neo-cons are tired of resistance from the pesky middle class. They are determined to destroy the middle class and bring us to our knees. We are a road bump on their path to world domination by the military-industrial complex.

They have already defeated the middle class in the US. They are shipping our jobs overseas, no one objects, and we are toast. They don't care about national security. These are muti-national corporations.

In fact, they have done such a good job of destroying the ideal of the US middle class, while deluding our citizens, that millions of red state Republicans are shouting and jumping for joy at the demise of the middle class. Of course, they are idiots, but knowing that doesn't help. They've been co-opted, and they are unreachable.

As the world's first true, large middle class (America) is being destroyed by the American neo-con/MIC plan, only the European middle class stands in their way.

The Europeans have been down this path of domination by a military-industrial complex, and they want nothing to do with the neo-cons. Hence the savage denigration of our European former allies by ignorant right-wing Americans, who mindlessly parrot the MIC owned US news media.

How do we stop this Orwellian plan?

I don't know.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Blue Moon by Trent © 2007
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group