It is currently Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:40 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Just Think: McChrystal Would Still be Running the War!
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 7:44 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 11:46 pm
Posts: 14444
Location: NC
Ever thought that if it hadn't been for the Rolling Stone piece, McChrystal would still be running the war? But is Patraeus any better? I'd like to see the wars end...in both Afghanistan and Iraq..then we wouldn't need either of them!

When Rolling Stone Calls the Shots, It’s Time to Negotiate

By Fred Branfman

It is amazing how little commentary there has been on the key issue raised by the McChrystal Affair: Should U.S. war policy be made by Rolling Stone? The very fact that it took a magazine article for President Barack Obama to remove Gen. Stanley McChrystal provides the strongest possible reason for allowing Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Pakistan to negotiate a settlement with the Taliban.


One point must be understood above all: McChrystal was not fired because he disrespected civilian authority, despised his administration colleagues and was running a dysfunctional operation. He was ousted because he allowed the public to find out—the one unforgivable sin for a U.S. executive branch long accustomed to operating its wars with little public or congressional knowledge or accountability, behind a PR curtain maintaining the myth that U.S. foreign and military policy is conducted democratically.


If the Rolling Stone piece had not appeared, McChrystal would still be running the war in Afghanistan, still ignoring e-mail messages from Richard “Wounded Beast” Holbrooke, still feeling betrayed by Karl “Traitor” Eikenberry, still blowing off Joe “Bite Me” Biden and James “Clown” Jones, and still disparaging Barack “Disengaged” Obama.

_________________
Image

"Behind every great fortune lies a great crime."
Honore de Balzac

"Democrats work to help people who need help.
That other party, they work for people who don't need help.
That's all there is to it."

~Harry S. Truman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Just Think: McChrystal Would Still be Running the War!
PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:27 am 
Offline
Hear Me Roar!

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:04 am
Posts: 329
Catherine wrote:
Ever thought that if it hadn't been for the Rolling Stone piece, McChrystal would still be running the war? But is Patraeus any better? I'd like to see the wars end...in both Afghanistan and Iraq..then we wouldn't need either of them!

When Rolling Stone Calls the Shots, It’s Time to Negotiate

By Fred Branfman

It is amazing how little commentary there has been on the key issue raised by the McChrystal Affair: Should U.S. war policy be made by Rolling Stone? The very fact that it took a magazine article for President Barack Obama to remove Gen. Stanley McChrystal provides the strongest possible reason for allowing Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Pakistan to negotiate a settlement with the Taliban.


One point must be understood above all: McChrystal was not fired because he disrespected civilian authority, despised his administration colleagues and was running a dysfunctional operation. He was ousted because he allowed the public to find out—the one unforgivable sin for a U.S. executive branch long accustomed to operating its wars with little public or congressional knowledge or accountability, behind a PR curtain maintaining the myth that U.S. foreign and military policy is conducted democratically.


If the Rolling Stone piece had not appeared, McChrystal would still be running the war in Afghanistan, still ignoring e-mail messages from Richard “Wounded Beast” Holbrooke, still feeling betrayed by Karl “Traitor” Eikenberry, still blowing off Joe “Bite Me” Biden and James “Clown” Jones, and still disparaging Barack “Disengaged” Obama.


Then, you have Mr. Assange from Wikileaks, you protects people like McChrystal, from the "powers that be," that want EVERYONE, to think that these wars are run in a "democratic fashion."

AND HIS ASS GETS THROWN IN JAIL!!

It's a wonderful time to be alive, isn't it!! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Just Think: McChrystal Would Still be Running the War!
PostPosted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 11:46 pm
Posts: 14444
Location: NC
bbbbbut...bbbbbut...we've got to keep those PATRIOTS in there...Leakin' on the government ain't patriotic (wink, wink a a la Sarah Palin).....didn't you know that????? (Tongue in cheek post...sarcastic to the nth degree!) :twisted:

:blackeye:

_________________
Image

"Behind every great fortune lies a great crime."
Honore de Balzac

"Democrats work to help people who need help.
That other party, they work for people who don't need help.
That's all there is to it."

~Harry S. Truman


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Blue Moon by Trent © 2007
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group