MACTANK wrote:
How about letting the Troops just carry on and get picked off one by one by insurgents?
How about just doing nothing and having a beer?
With that in mind al you Bush haters............... Tell me what your wisdom, political knowledge, and Military tactical expertise would advise GW to do.
I am very interested in the answers.
How about Pulling them out and they'll be no targets left to pick off?
How about the boys coming home and having a beer where it is safe?
Well, they could flatten it and kill them all. Yes, they could send 20+ thousand troops and stay in a perpetual war for the long term pick off.
Would you want to go with them and kick some of those doors in? How many more bombings will they be and how many innocent people will die on both sides? It is time to end this!
Do you think they would still be there if Iraq only had olives and not oil?
Track record ---> “Since the Second World War, the US has bombed China, Korea, Guatemala, Indonesia, Cuba, Guatemala (again), Peru, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, Guatemala (third time lucky), Grenada, Lebanon, Libya, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Iran, Panama, Iraq, Kuwait, Somalia, Bosnia, Afghanistan and Yugoslavia - in that order - and in not a single case did the bombing produce a democratic government as a direct result.” ~ Terry Jones
http://mindprod.com/politics/iraqmotives.html#MOTIVES
