Just ignore the SFB. It is his job to try and disseminate the propaganda of the whitewash. He is a mouthpiece puppet of the establishment.
Check out this site. it has Time delays of the 2nd plane going into the building, whisch say a lot about what happened. This is some parts of the site. Check out the complete site if you can stand the treachery of your government.
http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin ... ic.php?t=3
It's funny how even something like 911, which happened before all to see, what happens when you slow all of those Videos down and look at them frame by frame.
There is something that happens in the last fractions of a second on both Tower strikes, that is revealing; More revealing than any of us would like, yet nonetheless the videos and pictures show something else was happening on 911, that none of us could see with the naked eye or perceive. All of the photo's & video are courtesy of ABC NEWS Channel 7, CNN News, the New York Times and the L.A. Times, Camareplanet, MSNBC, The Fox News Channel and CBS Broadcasting.
This picture below from ABC News shows clearly the extra undercarriage equipment this 'special 767' had attached to it; One thing is for certain; Is that this plane is not the same plane that took off from Logan International Airport that morning, as this 'extra' equipment would have given it away in a heartbeat to the ground crews. Another thing is certain as well, yet equally disturbing. The passengers from Flight 175, the ill fated United flight that took off at Bostons Logan International, could not have been on this 767 plowing into the 2nd World Trade Center.
The fate of flight 175 and it's passengers lies elsewhere, but those peoples lives did not end here at the World Trade Center, as this is not the same 767 that took off from Bostons Logan, and it is doubtful this 767 is even of the same 200 series as was flight 175. There is evidence that shows this 767 to be a 767-300 series model, a plane a tad longer and heavier than the 200 series. Either way you slice it, this extra piece of equipment shows even the simple minded that this 767 wasn't ever at Boston's Logan Internaional airport that morning.
Here @ this link, you can view about 100 frames of the CNN/ABC video which shows the undercarriage pod in every frame! The pod can be seen around frame 60 and after. Please download these today as I am going to be removing this link later for Bandwidth purposes --- http://www.thewebfairy.com/911/letsroll ... mptransfer
Here is frame 115; Click to see picture.
Frame 115 Click here
Missile Pod Collage
Make sure you save and distribute! Click below!
http://www.911wasalie.com/images/CNNABC ... mpact1.jpg
Comments on above Image Sequence
In the above sequence of 9 frames, intermittently chosen between 39 and frame 55, the extra equipment on the planes undercarriage is in all of the stills of the video sequence. And in frame 54, CNN/ABC captures the same event as Cameraplanet, just from a different angle. Cameraplanets still of the same missile impact event is captioned in frame 55. (The greenish photo) The only way Aaron Brown could have missed this is because he had his back turned to it while reporting the event. Aaron, in the future, watch the event as you report it.
Notice how in frame 55, the orange fireball is gone, as is consistent with the footage from camerplanet. Also notice something in frame 55 that further supports these observations. Look at the place on the 767 where the right wing meets the aircrafts body in frame 55. In the rear of this area, off the top of the wings is a sheet of smoke making it's way off the planes upper wing area. This is harder to see in the video stills, but when one watches the video a few times, it's absolutely impossible to miss when looking for it. This sheet of smoke would be from the missiles exhaust.
Not only a Smoking Gun but a picture of the Missile! 3 frames!
]Picture of theBullet - Double Penetration[/URL]
http://www.911wasalie.com/images//missi ... ctory1.jpg
As far as I am concerned there is only one smoking gun among hundreds of strong evidences, to show 911 wasn't done by Arab terrorist's, and was an inside job. This proof is in the video's. This isn't tough stuff either. Although rockets are invloved, it's not rocket science, nor does it require a degree in rocket science to be able to watch a video of a plane shooting a missile out of it's undercarriage to be able to tell it's a missile. How can anyone refute proof drawn from publicly available video's from these same news sources? CNN captured the missile pod, as well as the missile ignition and launch and penetration. So did ABC. As well as MSNBC. And if thats not good enough for the most ardent of skeptics, it was captured by Fox and cameraplanet. And if all of that isn't enough to convince someone, this was all captured by millions of Americans with their home VCR's. As I have said elsewhere, this is part of the verifiable and permanent record of September 11th, 2001.
1. Pictures & Video that show an extra piece of equipment on the undercarriage of the 767. It is in every video regardless of the News Network affiliate taping. It is in stills. And it shouldn't be there.
A. It is not landing gear
B. It is not bay doors
C. It is not Landing lights
D. It is not a Flare
E. It is a missile pod.
2. A missile/missiles shooting out from the first plane in the firemans video and striking the North Tower just ahead of striking the building itself.
3. A single Missile shooting out of the 2nd plane into the World Trade Center fractions of a second before the plane strikes the building.
A. This is caught on every video made where the entire plane can be seen, regardless of the News Affiliate.
4. A Controlled Demolition of the World Trade Center using what could have only been pre-positioned shaped charges.
5. Strong evidence that WTC 1,2, & 7 were blown off their support columns by high energy explosives.
A. Shaped charges every 8 -10 floors
B. High Energy Explosives to destroy WTC's 47 support columns in sub basements
C. 3 large pools of molten steel found in the sub-basements of WTC 1,2 & 7
Use of High Energy Explosives 1
Use of High Energy Explosives 2
If I were King George II, I would no doubt have named this 'Last Crusade' this;
"Operation Longshanks III"
http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin ... c.php?t=91
Now in the photograph below, courtesy of ABC there is an extra piece of equipment on the undercarriage of the 767 that shouldn't be there, and couldn't have been there when the plane took off from Logan International Airport. You will see as you watch the video's that it is not a shadowing problem or landing gear. It is viewable in all of the video's from begginning to end. It's a missile pod.
This picture above shows the ABC coverage showing the same strange anomoly on the 767's right side belly; An add on piece of equipment, apparently just smaller than the engines; It also shows in every frame of all the videos, regardless of source.
<META http-equiv="refresh"content="1; URL=http://www.letsroll911.org">
That should keep you busy for a while.