Wheres the plane?????????

justinmoon22 · **Posted:** Tue May 16, 2006 10:46 pm

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/16/pentag ... index.html

Wheres the plane?????? 5 years for this?????? Looks like a missile to me. Wheres the other videos???? I know they have at least ten other shots of this. Where is the 155 ft. long 40 ft. tall plane??!!!!!!!!!

mga · **Posted:** Wed May 17, 2006 3:33 pm

well.....in defense of the video put out by the pentagon, it shows the nose of the plane in one frame and the explosion in the next. you have to remember the pictures taken were by a surveilance camera, which usually only takes frame-by-frame shots, so there are a couple seconds between each frame. the reason for this is the video recorder would have to be changed every 2 hours if it ran continuously. therefore, it takes pictures at intervals and makes it into a video type display.

if the plane is traveling at 400 mph or faster then the camera would grab one shot of the plane as it raced past the view point of the camera.

justinmoon22 · **Posted:** Wed May 17, 2006 7:18 pm

Im sorry. That was not a nose of a plane. That looked like a streak of a missile. I ll be convinced if they show the other cameras.

DO.g's · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2005 6:19 pm **Posts:** 2533

Until they release all the films from all around the pentagon, like from the gas stations, there is no way to tell what the hell that was. Which is exactly why they chose that particular one. I like the way CNN bingocallers state that this clip should allay the conspiracy theorists. If anything it should make us demand more videos to confirm what the government is trying to project/protect here. They could just as easily touch up ther photos with whatever they want, but are probably afraid that if they were detected tampering with the pictures, then their cover would be blown. What a dilemma.

Got Photoshop?

Noah · **Joined:** Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:46 pm **Posts:** 9

DO.g's wrote:

They could just as easily touch up ther photos with whatever they want, but are probably afraid that if they were detected tampering with the pictures, then their cover would be blown. What a dilemma.

Got Photoshop?

Speaking of which, the following film is probably what the footage would have looked like if something like a commercial airliner flew into it...

http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/edi ... eShown.php

DO.g's · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2005 6:19 pm **Posts:** 2533

Noah- I didn't get your video- Page can't be shown at this time- thingy came up. I went searching. Found only garbage sites related to www.signofthetimes.Shitty

I found this one though- http://911review.org/Reports/NEW_VIDEO.html

This is from 2004 and has 5 pages. This is page 2- http://www.911-strike.com/missing-confetti.htm

DO.g's · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2005 6:19 pm **Posts:** 2533

OK I finally got it. It was "signs" with an "s" and a lower case dash.

http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/edi ... eShown.php

Yeah thats a BIG IF. This is an older video, speculating on what it should have looked like.

Check out this video of the pentagon crash.
http://www.freedomunderground.org/memor ... n.php#Main

This is the infamous Purdue U)or P.U. as we call it) simulation.
http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020 ... tagon.html
Always good to put up the real conspiracy theorists attempt to cover up the crime and try to explain how the aircraft could have passed through E,D and C walls. Also check out this site which talks about the impossibility of the Purdue simulation. http://www.911-strike.com/missing-confetti.htm

Noah · **Joined:** Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:46 pm **Posts:** 9

Quote:

Check out this video of the pentagon crash.
http://www.freedomunderground.org/memor ... n.php#Main

This is the infamous Purdue U)or P.U. as we call it) simulation.
http://www.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020 ... tagon.html
Always good to put up the real conspiracy theorists attempt to cover up the crime and try to explain how the aircraft could have passed through E,D and C walls. Also check out this site which talks about the impossibility of the Purdue simulation. http://www.911-strike.com/missing-confetti.htm

Hi DO.g's,

Never saw the Purdue explanation or P.U. (lol!) "analysis" or rebuttal before. The photoshopped picture on 911-strike.com sure is worth a thousand words.

In fewer than a thousand words is this article 'New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved' at
Signs of the Times:

[url]http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials/signs20060517_NewDoctoredVideoofPentagonAttackReleaseConfirmsBoeingWasNotInvolved.php
[/url]

And another good rebuttal of the idea that it was a Boeing hit it is here:

http://abovetopsecret.narod.ru/Above_Top_Secret_article.htm

Noah · **Joined:** Sun Jan 08, 2006 6:46 pm **Posts:** 9

That would be: http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/editorials/signs20060517_NewDoctoredVideoofPentagonAttackReleaseConfirmsBoeingWasNotInvolved.php

DO.g's · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2005 6:19 pm **Posts:** 2533

It really is just a blur isn't it. Smoke and mirrors. I can't believe that is the best they can come up with to prove their point. Are they trying to support the conspiracy side or provoke it more?

There is mention of 2 other camera shots that the FBI won't release. Wonder what they show?

Quote:

Signs of the Times for Fri, 19 May 2006

New Doctored Video of Pentagon Attack Release - Confirms Boeing Was Not Involved
Joe Quinn
Signs of the Times
17/05/2006

The side of the Pentagon is 971 feet long and the "blob" or smoke trail in the above image is no more than 750 feet (250yards) from the camera. Remember the indelible images of those huge planes flying into the World Trade Center towers? The WTC planes were approximately the same distance from the observers on the ground as the "blob" in the above image was from the camera. So why can't we see a large 757 in the above image?

To sum up: At this stage, absent any new future video from the DOD, the U.S. government's "evidence" that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon consists of:
the "nose cone" frame
the white smoke trail or "blob" frame
the explosion at the Pentagon frames.

Convincing stuff, eh? This evidence is all the more suspect given the fact that the FBI confiscated tapes from at least two other video cameras in the area that would surely provide a more complete picture, but they refuse to release them.

A word on the response from alternative new pundits and 9/11 researchers about the new videos: Most appear to agree that there is nothing new in the videos that in any way discredits the sound allegations that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. A few notable editorialists however are attempting to revive the dead horse that is the claim that the "no Boeing at the pentagon" theory is one big government-sponsored Psyops. The theory goes that government spooks are deliberately fuelling the "no Boeing" theories in an attempt to draw in as many researchers as possible - a honey trap for conspiracy theorists if you will - and then, when enough have been lured in, destroy their reputations by releasing a definitive video that shows clearly that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.

Theories within theories. The complexitie of this conspiracy is getting as far fetched as any Sci-fi drama now. Now they want to discredit the conspiracy theorists with another conspiracy to prove that the conspiracy theorists are wrong about this, so they are wrong about the whole days events. Like dominos, they want to see the whole thing come down. They better watch out that their lies don't show that they have conspired to prove something that can lead to the truth coming out. We'll see whos reputations get discredited soon, perhaps come election time this year.

I like that they tell us that this may be the Achilles heel of the days events, and it really could be the one blunder they made and in hindsight the Pentagon attack may not be able to be explained as an attack by Al Qaida but another example of the real terrorist force - Al CIAda.

Thanks noah for getting the right video up there.

justinmoon22 · **Posted:** Mon May 22, 2006 3:47 pm

They're getting their "actual" footage together. We will see a fake pretty soon to squash the conspiracy theorists. It just makes them look worse the longer they take.

Wheres the plane?????????

Who is online