Maybe a dictatorship is the best thing for America.
This sounds funny, but you know what? The TYPE of government doesn't matter so much, as the RIGHTS citizens enjoy. Whether the govt. is a dictatorship, democracy, republic, monarchy, or whatever, if the people are left free to pursue commerce w/a minimum of govt interference, the people will be prosperous and happy. We live in a so-called democracy where, as time wears on, we are little more than serfs. On one end of the spectrum you have Tyranny, on the other you have Anarchy. The ideal is Liberty (which is MUCH closer to Anarchy than Tyranny), where govt does little more than protect your life and property, as well as enforce contracts.
set up your own central bank
Why does there have to be a central bank? Why should one, central body/person be able to decide what We The People use as money? If you've studied the history of central banks, you should realize that the INSTITUTION of central banking is the problem.
There is nothing wrong with a fiat currency if it is controlled proplerly
Actually fiat currency itself is VERY WRONG, and throughout history, EVERY fiat currency has failed. The current fiat system we have, now, is supposedly "controlled properly". Why would you want to replace a system w/a 100% failure rate with the same kind of system?
It doesn't even have to be a system backed by gold.
I agree that it doesn't HAVE to be gold and/or silver, but there is no denying that gold/silver is Constitutional money, or the fact that they have the best track record. A 100% gold/silver backed currency has never failed. Also, realize that the usage of gold/silver as money came about due to the will of PEOPLE, not governments. Individuals (i.e., the FREE MARKET), over the course of many, many years decided that gold/silver was the best form of money. In today's high-tech world, there is no limit to WHAT can be used as money. I, for one, would just like to see it taken out of the hands of private bankers AND government, and for the FREE MARKET to determine what should be used as money.
Why not just take control of the country and then phone the bankers up and say:
' We are not going to pay the 8 trillion because we can't. If you don't like it then shove it. We will make you a deal. And, here is the deal......................'
Why not repudiate the debt due to it being illegal and un-Constitutional? Why not charge the Banksters with fraud against the public as well as charge them with being traitors to the Constitution--which STILL carries the penalty of DEATH?