Why is Wikipedia Censoring Me? -- by James Bacque

Sir-Irate · **Posted:** Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:03 am

Why is Wikipedia Censoring Me? -- by James Bacque
http://serendipity.li/hr/bacque_on_wikipedia.htm

In 1989, I published the first in a series of books about the Second World War and its aftermath. The first, Other Losses, showed the tremendous atrocities committed against enemy prisoners in the prison camps of the US and France after 1945. The next, Just Raoul, was a biography of a hero of the French Resistance who saved many refugees from Nazi death camps. The next, Crimes and Mercies, described the full extent of all allied crimes against Germans, plus the wonderful charity work of Canada and the USA in saving 800 million people, including Germans, Japanese and Italians, from starving to death in the hungry years after 1945. The next, Dear Enemy, illuminated the attitudes of the western allies to Germany from 1945 to now.

Wikipedia reviews and criticizes only Other Losses, and in such a biassed way, that I finally tried to correct their many errors. Starting in March, 2006, I tried repeatedly over many weeks to correct the errors, but found that within a day at first, then within hours, and finally within minutes, some Wikipedian editor had expunged my corrections, replacing them with ever more hostile and denigrating allegations. Friends of mine tried also to correct the flawed Wikipedia article, but found the same situation. Finally we decided that Wikipedia was deliberately censoring my contributions, and that it was pointless to continue trying to present the facts on Wikipedia. After Serendipity (already acquainted with censorship at Wikipedia) heard of this situation I was offered the chance to publish the real story, which appears below.

Wikipedia quotes Stephen E. Ambrose as saying that Other Losses is "... spectacularly flawed ..." without saying that Ambrose also wrote that "You have made a major historical discovery which will ... span the oceans and have reverberations for decades, yea centuries to come. You have the goods on these guys ..."

Wikipedia does not say that Ambrose changed his mind only after he was retained by the US Army to lecture at the War College in Pennsylvania. Nor does Wikipedia mention that in his attack on me in the New York Times, he admitted that he had not done the necessary research to reach the conclusions that he published in that same article. Wikipedia fails to mention that the Ambrose it cites as an authority admitted that he had plagiarized several other authors. Wikipedia does not concern itself with the accusations that Ambrose stole work from a graduate student which he published as his own.

Wikipedia ignores my book, Crimes and Mercies, which goes far towards balancing the record of western actions after World War Two. The book shows the great charity extended by the western allies, chiefly Canada and the USA, towards the starving around the world after WW2, including the Japanese and Germans. Saying that the overwhelming majority of professional historians reject my work, and citing as an authority one historian who has never worked in this field, Wikipedia ignores the support given me by the eminent US Army military historian Col. Dr. Ernest F. Fisher, a former Senior Historian of the US Army Center for Military History, Washington. Fisher, a professional historian for decades, wrote the official US Army history of the campaign in Italy. He assisted me for months in researching documents in the US National Archives, wrote the Introduction to my book Other Losses, and has supported me with public statements for the seventeen years since its first publication. He helped me for many months researching in the archives. >--More-->

http://serendipity.li/hr/bacque_on_wikipedia.htm

DO.g's · **Joined:** Thu Mar 24, 2005 6:19 pm **Posts:** 2533

Since they can't read our minds YET, they have to control what we think!

Quote:

In 1997 James Bacque published his Crimes and Mercies, which showed that more than nine million Germans (mostly civilians) died as a result of Allied starvation and expulsion policies in the first five years after World War II. These deaths were not accidental, but were the result of deliberately genocidal policies instituted by Dwight Eisenhower and Henry Morgenthau. They began planning for this in 1944, before the extent of the atrocities of the death camps became known. (That more Germans did not starve to death or die of illness in the post-war years was due to the humanity of Herbert Hoover and others.) Awareness of this act of genocide has been suppressed for fifty years not only by the Allied governments but also by the German government.

James Bacque: Did the Allies Starve Millions of Germans?

This article and his books really puts a different lens on the way we see history. It really is from their perspective and not the real history. Manufacturing beliefs. It is the one reason that freedom of speech must be open to all possibilities about the events around the holocaust and other post WW2 realities.

From http://serendipity.li/hr/bacque01.htm -

Quote:

I first happened on the outlines of this story while researching my 1989 book Other Losses, about the mass deaths of German prisoners of war in Allied camps. For 45 years, historians have never disputed a massive survey conducted over four years by the government of chancellor Konrad Adenauer, which stated that some 1.4 million German prisoners had died in captivity. What is still disputed by the two sides is how many died in each side's camps. Each has blamed the other for nearly all the deaths.

The fall of the Soviet empire in 1989 provided a spectacular test of the truth: If the KGB archives recorded how many Germans died in Soviet camps, the world would know how many died in the West.

In 1992, I went to the KGB archives in Moscow, where I was permitted to troll the long, gloomy aisles, free to read and photocopy anything I wanted. And there I found the reports from KGB Colonel I. Bulanov and others showing that 450,600 Germans had died in Soviet camps. Given the figure of 1.4 million deaths, this meant that close to one million had died in Western camps.

In addition, the KGB records show that the Soviets had also imprisoned hundreds of thousands of civilians, of whom many thousands died.

This was the shadow of a greater tragedy, the fate of German civilians.

Knowing what we know about extraordinary rendition, was the USSR an early port for elimination? Has anyone ever done an analysis of the percentage of Jews who died in the gulags in Russia under Stalin?

Good article and another example of repression of questions, like so many other examples we have.

Catherine · **Posted:** Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:24 pm

I thought Wiki actually asked for additional information on all their topics at the end of the articles.

nygreenguy · **Posted:** Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:07 pm

Are you James Bacque?

Sir-Irate · **Posted:** Tue Feb 20, 2007 10:16 pm

Cath, - I think what he meant was someone was editing "his" data.

Nygg - Well, when I woke up this morning I wasn't.

Catherine · **Posted:** Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:40 pm

Quote:

Cath, - I think what he meant was someone was editing "his" data.

hmmm...makes sense if someone wanted to "add" or "delete" or "edit" information. I don't know who monitors those kinds of submissions at Wiki...but if I'd submitted something to Wiki that I knew was true, and could prove it was true, I'd be raising hell with them.

Why is Wikipedia Censoring Me? -- by James Bacque

Who is online