I disagree with the sun-heating-up hypothesis:
What will it be next, wars over climate change?
I would predict not wars "over" climate change but wars forced
by climate change. We're already seeing, with issues such as retirement and long-term care, that people who have money live and people who don't die.
So I wouldn't be shocked to see genocide by rich people against poor people over dwindling resources in the future. In fact, we're seeing it now, with the war in Iraq. The NWO is murdering people for resources now.
It's all the talk nowadays. When air and water gain parity with oil as crucial resources, is war forced by climate change really so hard to predict?
solution = One World Order / New World Order.
I don't agree with that line of reasoning either, because it's the NWO that has led us down this path in the first place. In other words, the NWO already exists; to postulate its implementation as a solution
to climate change therefore doesn't follow. I don't know of any examples of alternative energy that are being implemented on an NWO scale; do you?
Global warming has finally been explained: the Earth is getting hotter because the Sun is burning more brightly than at any time during the past 1,000 years, according to new research.
Gore's chart went back over 600,000
years. Anyone citing a 1,000 year sample of data really can't compete with that.
Furthermore, if global warming is solely the result of the sun warming up, that's like saying there's no hope, and that we just happen to be the victims of the unexplainable. That proposition is simply too pie-in-the-sky to be taken seriously.
And as far as NWO interests spinning the data, are we really to believe the global oil industry has no interest whatsoever in spinning away data that supports the human responsibility
behind global warming?
In conclusion, we know from the Disclosure Project that an oil-based NWO was obsolete over fifty years ago, and that the spooks have held us in this prison for psychological reasons: they can't accept the simple prospect of living free, much less seeing others live free.
NWO isn't the answer to global warming; radical reform of civilization is. The real question isn't Gore's NWO vs. Bush's NWO. The real question is why is this a world governed by politics
when human life, fundamentally, is a personal, spiritual
experience? The real question is why, when we dial 1-800 for customer service, is there almost always a hapless C.H.U.D. waiting for us on the other end of the line? The debate over the sun vs. oil is merely a symptom of the real problem. The real problem is us, personally, and our utter ineffectiveness as a race.
Every political question is a half-baked reflection of a deeper, self-improvement question. Every political debate is a coded discussion between people who want to be free vs. people who are terrified of being free.