ECSMOKELOC wrote:
Regarding the video "In Plane Site", I have heard from reputable sources that it is a "fake video". I figure this is in reference to the "pod theory" that has been disproven. What is your response to this? Is this a red herring?
Welcome to the board.
The 1st In Plane Site video raised many questions avout the events based on footage shown on TV. Since the 1st editon a new release came out that includes information about some of the footage that has since been explained.
The biggest critic was the website oilempire.us. I spoke with Mark, the person who did the write up, and he was not able to find one single thing in the IPS video that he could debnunk to me. I also offered to confrence in to our call, Dave Von Kleist, the IPS filmaker. Mark refused. I tried for over a half hour to convince Mark to confron the person that he has been accusing all this time. Mark refused. Dave was ready willing and able to partake in the discussion.
I have viewed the video and it is indeed alarming and it is very straight forward. Loose Change also has some alarming footage. All the footage is from pubic record.
Last week it came to light that the engine found in the street at the WTC was that of a 737 not a 767. This appears to confirm the claims of these videos that it was not passenger jets that hit the towers.
If you would like to get the DVDs from my site I will refund your money if you find them to be scams (minus shipping charges). I assure you they are pretty damn alarming and you will find it hard to counter the points made in these films.
The bottom line is that there appears to be an object on the plane and a flash comming from this object. Nothing has been proven or disproven at this point. Interestingly enough the evidence has been destroyed, which in itself is a crime. The plane parts should have gone to the NTSB. They did not. This does not exactly seem like the actions of people that have nothing to hide.
Welcome to the board.
