nygreenguy wrote:
Oh wow, I couldnt disagree more. The truth is
not subjective. There is only 1 truth, and it doesnt change depending on what we want or what we think feels good.
And personal experience is by far the worst thing to base truth on. Imagine if we did base truth on personal experience. Blacks would all be on welfare, all people from the south WOULD be stupid, the earth WOULD have been created in 6 days, there WOULD be WMD's in Iraq.
See, our brains are quite deceptive organs and often times we believe that which is simply not true, or did not happen. (this is why eye witnesses are some of the worst type of evidence). Our personal observation are just not good enough to count as evidence.
Quote:
The belief in God is the most personal of human beliefs. This is where religion fails, its insistence that there is only one truth. Every human must decide for himself or herself, or they abrogate an essential part of their humanity. One of my core beliefs is that God is the only entity that can be all things to all people while not having to be the same to any two.
Well, yeah. Anytime you can fabricate a belief system, you can also control the rules in order to avoid conflict, contradictions, etc... But
any god belief fails to ever be logically consistent, and thusly must be discarded.
lefty wrote:
A Proud Liberal wrote:
Every human must decide for himself or herself, or they abrogate an essential part of their humanity.
I would like to ask for some clarification on this one APL. (The bolded sentence above) Do you mean that considering whether god exists or not is an essential part of humanity or that belief in god is an essential part of humanity?
Lefty I can answer you first—I refer to the belief in the existence of God or the belief there is no God or the beliefs of those that straddle the fence of agnosticism. All three carry with them their implications that humans carry with them in living their lives. In a true pluralistic society, there would be a respect for others that would preclude the proselytization that is rampant among the religious bigots of all stripes.
Greenguy answering your objections could be easy by me saying that my personal beliefs are what they are and your filters (objections) will not change them in any way. I view them as a proselytization of atheism. It was never and will never be my intent to change someone to my point of view but let me try to answer your objections point by point:nygreenguy wrote:
Oh wow, I couldnt disagree more. The truth is not subjective. There is only 1 truth, and it doesnt change depending on what we want or what we think feels good.
And personal experience is by far the worst thing to base truth on. Imagine if we did base truth on personal experience. Blacks would all be on welfare, all people from the south WOULD be stupid, the earth WOULD have been created in 6 days, there WOULD be WMD's in Iraq.
Yes, a person's view of the truth is based on PERSONAL experience, for what else does an individual have with any degree of certainty. Descartes said one must doubt everything first before one can start a base on which to build your belief system. This is where he came up with "I think, therefore I am." Some have become so enamored with this thought that they believe everything beyond themselves is just the product of their imagination.
Experience might be the worst thing because it is the only thing one can use to base your view of the truth (belief system). This is NOT based on what feels good but on empirical hard evidence. I can never know all blacks are on welfare because I can NEVER know all blacks and all the African-Americans that I know personally are NOT on welfare. I can never know all people from the South are stupid because I can NEVER know all Southerners and know some very smart people from the South. I can NEVER know if the world was created in six days for two reasons: first, I was not there and secondly, all the hard scientific evidence I have examined (experienced) says otherwise. The wishful thinking of the Bush war crime cabal is not knowledge or truth, it is patently false by the lack of WMD's in Iraq, there is no empirical evidence of their existence.nygreenguy wrote:
See, our brains are quite deceptive organs and often times we believe that which is simply not true, or did not happen. (this is why eye witnesses are some of the worst type of evidence). Our personal observation are just not good enough to count as evidence.
Well, yeah. Anytime you can fabricate a belief system, you can also control the rules in order to avoid conflict, contradictions, etc... But any god belief fails to ever be logically consistent, and thusly must be discarded.
We all fabricate or build our own belief systems. The word fabricate carries an unfortunate connotation of falsehood. I will answer you with the following statements:
I have experienced the existence of God to my own personal satisfaction that it can never be doubted. That being said, it is NEVER my intention to convince others of this personal truth.
I am convinced that the eyewitness testimony used to convict Nazi war criminals was sufficiently real enough that I have no doubt that the hangings carried out as a result were justified.
I submit to you that IF "But any god belief (system) fails to ever be logically consistent, and thusly must be discarded," that your belief in NO god is a god belief system and needs to be discarded.