Skepticism of the official story is warranted. However, some people take it to the extreme (attacking those who don't) and claim definitively that there were NO hijackers, and that the planes were not hijacked by the named individuals at all.
This can't be proven.
What we have is a lack of evidence MADE PUBLIC
. This does nto mean such evidence does not exist. It means they won't tell us. Two different scenarios.
You can find a lot of evidence concerning the alleged hijackers here:
[url=http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html]United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui
Criminal No. 01-455-A
Prosecution Trial Exhibits[/url]
There is high quantity. But notice the lack of quality on this massive list.
You can draw your own conclusions. However, just because evidence was not made public, does not mean it doesn't exist.
I have been called all sorts of names from "9/11 Truthers" who should probably call themselves "9/11 Speculators."
I have been burned by assuming too much before. These are highly delicate matters.
Someone mentioned a "16 foot hole" above. Not true. The hole extended to the north 50 feet from that "hole." Bogus claims get us ridiculed in the press.ERROR: 'The Pentagon Attack Left Only a Small Impact Hole'
The waters are so muddy now that one can find several links to support almost anything. The Pentagon wall did not collapse for 1/2 hour. During that time period there was a 16 foot hole punching through three rings whcih amounts to 9 feet of heavily reinforced concrete. The photos were on the Pentagon web site for awhile.
In addition, there was no evidence that was unique to a 757 which weighs 100 tons. The main titanium alloy engines weigh 20,000 pound each. The peice of brightly painted aluminum which was so prominently displayed had not one scorch or burn mark on it. Its separation for the main wreckage made it appear as though it were carried in by hand. The remaining engine from the wreckage was not that of a 757.
You mention redicule from the press? Who cares? We all know who controls the press. Do you expect the perpetrators to fail to throw every switch available while protecting their hoax?
I probably have ten 9/11 DVDs and books scattered about. Of course I can't prove it. The question noyone answers is why was the Pentagon video confiscated from the Sheraton, the convenience store, the Pentagon, and possibly the highway that the 757 flew over?
I'm sure they will release video as soon as they have the technology to make a credible fake. It has been six years now. Six years. In that time, they released exactly one frame which still fails to show a 757.
I think a 757 flew over the Pentagon. I'm not disputing the presence of a 757. But there was no 757 at the crash site.
If they have evidence and with hold it...I would ask what purpose that would serve. Do you expect thinking people to believe something that looks to have taken over 6 years to produce?
Why was the video confiscated in the first place?