dee35ann wrote:
Nov. 12,2007 - Purple Tang said:= If you keep complaining, the neocons may install their brand of gov. in your state.
Ques. 1 - Can you define the word may? The Republican Party has held the greater # of key positions in almost all of our 50 states for the past 12 years and in all 3 branches of the Federal Government, until this last election. I have yet to see the newly elected Democrats do a job they were elected to do. Maybe they have bought into the Republican philosophical cure all (ONE WORLD ORDER or ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT)
for the entire world. Perhaps they are cowards in the truest form. Perhaps they have been convinced "its all going to happen - play along and get a good position to the good life."
My personal defination of either of the above is: Allow no country or nation live according to their laws - make more severe slaves out of the entire population throughout the whole world forcing them to cow-toe to the elite and rich society only.
Ques-2 - Just how long do you think this NEW WORLD ORDER concept has been in the making? Mikhail Gorbachev was the first world leader to come out publicly with talk of a new world order on Dec. 7, 1988 in his address to the United Nations.
About 12 years later, George Bush Sr. jumped on the wagon and before leaving for Helsinki, Finland in early Sept. 1990 to discuss the Persian Gulf crisis, at a summit meeting with Gorbachev, expressed the hope that the foundation for the New World Order would be laid in Helsinki.
Then supposedly in 1993, the New World Order was established as a legitimate national agenda by a Democrat, Bill Clinton. Understand we cannot always buy into anothers opinion and anything we read is full of the authors personal opinion. That is one reason I believe very little of anyone's opinion except my own.
Ques- 3 - If you have a solution to this mess we all have gotten ourselves into - please share it with the rest of us. Besides complaining what else
can we do to correct it?????????
I posted the 'Razz' emoticon to show that it was indeed a razz.
My theory on the impotent democrats is that many are either members of a semi-secretive elite group or they have met the approval of this group.
As I recall the 2006 democratic campaign was essentially led by one person who helped select the politicians from the ground up. Not one renegade. Not one real leader in the bunch. Curious indeed.
I would bet good money that Pelosi is a member of this organization. She is such a lap dog for the PNAC.
The nation has been hi jacked by nefarious leadership. Pure and simple. Thye have tentacles in all key areas of intelligence, enforcement, investigation, banking, energy, military, counter-intelligence (the greater part of intelligence really)...you name it.
People are greedy. Many will compromse their principles for the promise of a better life. National leadership that is steered by ethics rather than greed is the exception. I would say this trend extends below the national level as well.