Catherine, I've never heard of the AHRC, but it does sound fishy what the judge ordered. But realize, what you're quoting comes from their web site.
I thought at first what might be happening is a "parking" issue. But it sounds like the judge is taking issue with the operation of the web site.
I found this as an apposing view AHRC Exposed
Supposedly, the owners of the web site were found to have committed fraud.
The AHRC was also considered to be a "VEXATIOUS LITIGANT". A wikipedia definition
seems to be descriptive of the term.
So, it sounds like the issue about AHRC is more than just about operating their web site, but, in a sense, how they conduct their business.
*** *** ***
On a side note, related to the original topic, Bernie has a blog
, if he doesn't have job to keep his political observation skills sharp.