...........at it again.

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/02/16/malkin-bill-rights/


what a piece of crap. this woman will stop at nothing to serve or better yet, prostitute herself to the facist/neocon corporate interests that despise the rights that ultimately are protecting her. she just plain doesn't frickin get it.

they hate america and what our forefathers had the wisdom and foresight to put into place in our constitution to protect us from assholes like her and the rest of the garbage now known as the Grand Ole Pedophiles.


the war continues.

and the real terrorists reside on our own soil in thier republiquada camps.

Just another SHILL for those who control / censor the media. She seems "more then willing" to go along with it. As far as I am concerned, people like her in the controlled media, are all criminals. It is as simple as that. They are criminals!

That says it all!

Strange little story about the mysterious switch-up in a recent Malkin piece.

After the New Hampshire votes running, Malkin had an article out entitled, "The Clintons in Crisis".

In the original article, she had this opener:

But it seems to have been tailored without an obvious correction.

The "Comeback Gal" Spin


Interestingly, the discrepancy was caught here:

We still have a chance, a very small window.

I'm not endorsing that tiny window yet, but I think it's name is Barak Obama.

I have not been comfortable with Obama. Disappointing to me, because I wanted to be enthusiastic about our first black Presidential candidate.

But he is taking a lot of money from special interests and I don't see how he isn't being bought out by them. Plus, you can tell me until we both turn blue that he is the same age as Kennedy when he won the Presidency, that still does not make him Kennedy.

I am very uncomfortable about Obama, but as many before me have done, will hold my nose and vote for him if he is the chosen candidate. (And hope my instincts are wrong...)

You spoke my feelings about Obama quite well, dori.

I, too, will vote for him if he is the choice of the Dems, but I won't feel comfortable doing it. He has a looooong, looooong way to go before he's anything similar to Jack Kennedy.

One thing that will help me feel better....or worse.... if this is what comes down the pipe, is WHO HE CHOOSES FOR HIS RUNNING MATE.

I agree that the candidates are all missing something, Just...is it their hollow-sounding promises about how they're for the common American when they're taking tons of money from the special interest groups? It's pretty hard to hide things now from Americans who really want to dig out information about a politician, thanks mostly to the internet. And I for one am glad we have it. It's about the only thing George Bush hasn't been able to control and as such, it's proven to be one of his biggest albatrosses.

I think another one of the reasons we're feeling that we must vote for a Democrat is that throughout far too much of our nation's history, it's taken a Democrat to come in and clean up the mess made by a Repub...and the Democrat who gets to start to clean up Bush's mess has got his/her work cut out for him/her!

We want to feel some hope again. We want to see ourselves as proud to be Americans again. We want to feel proud of the POTUS rather than ashamed of him whenever he goes to another country. We want to hear the POTUS speak and not cringe every time his lips move. We want to see ourselves as being reasonable, thinking citizens who can make a reasonably good choice when deciding who the next leader of our country is going to be. After all, we've looked pretty stupid for the last seven years!

I am not a Democrat and I believe there are others here who are not Democrats. I, like the people who are Democrats, want to vote for whomever appears to be the best choice among those who are the eventual candidates.

And I have a hard time believing that would be an R.

Third parties are a dream, but voting for them can bring us a nightmare.

This isn't a game. Our lives depend on this!