lefty wrote:
Really he just looks like an old dude.
===========
A lot of times I think it is hard for the general populous to accept "conspiracy theories" because of some of the extremely far-fetched ideas like the one that site is espousing. While I am of the belief that the elite are in control of the world, I do not think that they are part of a satanic bloodline. When fantasy and reality are mixed, its harder for people to accept the truth in any of it and then the whole idea is dismissed as whacko.
Just like the 9/11 truth movement. We all know there was something sinister there, yet a lot in the movement put some really far out theories out that that make it hard for a regular person to accept which leads to the whole idea to become a joke. Sometimes I think those who understand and try to spread knowledge shoot themselves in the foot when they present too much at one time or too many angles that are hard for average people to accept.
I'm of the opinion that the 9/11 movement has as much activity from disinformation agents as from people truly seeking the truth. That is a big reason that I rarely enter internet discussions with them. I have seen the same responses literally dozens of times. I could write part of their 9/11 manual from memory.
I'm not into the bloodlines theory and I said to disregard the text. I google Rockefeller on a daily basis and peruse whatever comes up.
However I will state that the tendancy of the left to ignore the literally mountains of information on the international cabals, all of which Rockefeller heads, does make it a lot easier for them to operate. And he thanks them for that.
On the other hand, the right wing has been all over the Rockefellers for decades. The 9/11 truth movement has also found the vast majority of its strenght and funding from the right wing.
We need both parties.
To cancel each other out when the other party gets too powerful.
Johnsons 'Great Society' is often a pain in the nations butt. As is many parts of Roosevelt's 'New Deal.'
I'd be in favor of a Congress and Executive branch that were split 50/50 with dems and reps. Certainly not 40% representing Wall Street and 25% representing the defence contractors.
If Obama gets too powerful and proves to be equally corrupt to this admin, I will be rooting for the reps in several years. The odds of his admin matching this one in corruption are slim. This one has highly experienced pros.
