Associate Justice Samuel Alito wrote the opinion for a 6-3 majority, joined by the court's conservatives. Associate Justice Elena Kagan wrote a dissent, joined by the court's liberals, that described the majority opinion as "tragic."
The case, the most significant to deal with voting rights to come before the court since 2013, dealt with two provisions of Arizona's voting law approved long before the 2020 election. State officials passed a law in 2016 barring unions and advocacy organizations from collecting voters' mail-in ballots, a practice that critics call "ballot harvesting."
The city of Detroit has agreed to pay $300,000 to a Black man who was wrongly...
South Carolina has implemented one of the most restrictive book ban laws in the US, enabling...
Grief and anger engulfed the city of Utica, N.Y., after a police officer shot and killed...
A Kentucky judge dismissed a lawsuit brought by three Jewish mothers who argued that the state's...
