A nuclear fix to the leaking well has been touted online and in the occasional newspaper op-ed for weeks now. Washington has repeatedly dismissed the idea and BP execs say they are not considering an explosion -- nuclear or otherwise. But as a series of efforts to plug the 60,000 barrels of oil a day gushing from the sea floor have failed, talk of an extreme solution refuses to die.
For some, blasting the problem seems the most logical answer in the world. Mikhailov has had a distinguished career in the nuclear field, helping to close a Soviet Union program that used nuclear explosions to seal gas leaks.
Ordinarily he's an opponent of nuclear blasts, but he says an underwater explosion in the Gulf of Mexico would not be harmful and could cost no more than $10 million. That compares with the $2.35 billion BP has paid out in cleanup and compensation costs so far. "This option is worth the money," he says.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) intends to rewrite limits on toxic waste from power plants, the...
Last year was Earth's warmest on record, according to an international climate report issued Thursday by...
Emergency workers battled on Sunday to contain an oil spill near a joint Kuwaiti-Saudi oilfield in...
Evidence is piling up that this year's sizzling summer in central and southeastern Europe has decimated...
