There is also some consternation from concerned citizens about a recent Politico.com story, which reports that the Iowa statewide caucus counting will be moved to an undisclosed location, its author chiding those who question the transparency behind such a move as "conspiracy minded types."
To be clear about this, insisting on transparency is a necessary and patriotic element of running any public election, and ridiculing public citizens who examine transparency is kind of embarrassing. For the reporter. Not the citizens.
The truth is, the counting process, even if it is moved to a secret location, will not destroy transparency if the process I outline at the end of this article is followed.
In order to protect any election, we need to boil the process down to its simplest components, refuse to take our eye off them, and understand the difference between a public election, which is democratic in nature, and a non-public election, which is simply a bit of theatre.
The rightwing group Alec is preparing to launch a new nationwide network that will seek to...
The National Rifle Association (NRA) sent a letter to Senate leaders on Wednesday evening urging the...
When a bipartisan Senate panel last week lambasted Swiss bank Credit Suisse for helping rich Americans...
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer has vetoed a hot-button measure that would have permitted businesses in the...
