There is also some consternation from concerned citizens about a recent Politico.com story, which reports that the Iowa statewide caucus counting will be moved to an undisclosed location, its author chiding those who question the transparency behind such a move as "conspiracy minded types."
To be clear about this, insisting on transparency is a necessary and patriotic element of running any public election, and ridiculing public citizens who examine transparency is kind of embarrassing. For the reporter. Not the citizens.
The truth is, the counting process, even if it is moved to a secret location, will not destroy transparency if the process I outline at the end of this article is followed.
In order to protect any election, we need to boil the process down to its simplest components, refuse to take our eye off them, and understand the difference between a public election, which is democratic in nature, and a non-public election, which is simply a bit of theatre.
The Supreme Court on Thursday restricted the use of a relatively new law enforcement technique that...
When Tycen Proper, 19, finished high school, his family gave him at least $3,000 of “graduation...
The Supreme Court dealt President Donald Trump's agenda major blows June 29 when it comes to...
A series of slickly produced videos show agents clad in suits and sunglasses striding confidently in...
