There is also some consternation from concerned citizens about a recent Politico.com story, which reports that the Iowa statewide caucus counting will be moved to an undisclosed location, its author chiding those who question the transparency behind such a move as "conspiracy minded types."
To be clear about this, insisting on transparency is a necessary and patriotic element of running any public election, and ridiculing public citizens who examine transparency is kind of embarrassing. For the reporter. Not the citizens.
The truth is, the counting process, even if it is moved to a secret location, will not destroy transparency if the process I outline at the end of this article is followed.
In order to protect any election, we need to boil the process down to its simplest components, refuse to take our eye off them, and understand the difference between a public election, which is democratic in nature, and a non-public election, which is simply a bit of theatre.
It's been 60 years since the 1964 Civil Rights Act was signed into law.
Across the country,...
When Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch voted Friday to decisively end the deference courts have given...
n what several supporters described as a “night and day” difference from his performance in last...
The Supreme Court ordered a new review of the law behind obstruction charges filed against hundreds...
