A federal appeals court ruled in July that the Copyright Royalty Board, a panel of administrative judges who set the rate broadcasters pay for copyright licenses, was unconstitutional because of the way its panelists are appointed and the job protections they are given.
The ruling could impact the work of thousands of administrative judges dissecting the details of regulations at U.S. government agencies from the Federal Communications Commission to the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Such judges' hearings replace traditional trials when regulations are at issue. They hear more cases than the entire judicial branch combined, said Arti Rai, a professor at Duke University School of Law.
This week, the New York Times awoke from its slumber to publish an extensive investigation on...
A coalition of Democratic-led states filed a lawsuit on Monday seeking to prevent Donald Trump’s administration...
More than 100 organizations that support victims of human trafficking have lost funding since October, leaving...
While Donald Trump’s justice department did not deliver on a legal requirement to disclose all Jeffrey...
