A federal appeals court ruled in July that the Copyright Royalty Board, a panel of administrative judges who set the rate broadcasters pay for copyright licenses, was unconstitutional because of the way its panelists are appointed and the job protections they are given.
The ruling could impact the work of thousands of administrative judges dissecting the details of regulations at U.S. government agencies from the Federal Communications Commission to the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Such judges' hearings replace traditional trials when regulations are at issue. They hear more cases than the entire judicial branch combined, said Arti Rai, a professor at Duke University School of Law.
The Supreme Court dealt President Donald Trump's agenda major blows June 29 when it comes to...
A series of slickly produced videos show agents clad in suits and sunglasses striding confidently in...
When Tycen Proper, 19, finished high school, his family gave him at least $3,000 of “graduation...
State election officials do not expect the federal government to reliably share election threat information during...
