It's not the results of an election that could determine who is prosecuted. It's the reslts of an election that could -- in a dreamy optimistic fantasy anyway -- determine whether laws are enforced. The Justice Department is right now a branch of a political party, hiring and firing on that basis, and - yes - prosecuting on that basis. Any future president must undo that, and must prosecute openly criminal predecessors, regardless of party. But rather than asking McCain to make that commitment, you choose to ask Obama NOT to. Which side of the law are you on? I repeat: Bush is not a candidate this year. He cannot win or lose. Your acceptance of the idea that party loyalty must supercede all else, including both the rule of law and the significance of elections, that it must go completely unquestioned, just like your fantasies about the utility of torture, is the root of the difficulty here.
Torture Supporter Dershowitz Says Not to Prosecute Bush, Cheney, et alia
The Israeli government announced on Tuesday that it had approved a budget of approximately 1.3bn shekels...
The Church of England has voted to hear Palestinian Christians, defying efforts by pro-Israel organisations to...
A global campaign in support of captive Palestinians has urged the International Committee of the Red...
The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) and Khalil's lawyers from Beldock Levine & Hoffman announced the...
