New evidence has emerged in Congressional inquiries that throw more light on the extent to which early knowledge and approval of the abuse went to the highest levels. What does a country do when compelling evidence shows its leaders have authorised international crimes?
Buried away in this testimony lies the most dangerous material of all: evidence which may establish that abuses on detainees in Iraq in September 2003, in the period perhaps including the events at Abu Ghraib, were the result of decisions taken at the highest levels of the administration.
At the very least, the next US president must ensure the full facts are established. It will then be for others to decide what follows. But if the US doesn't get its own house in order and restore its reputation for the rule of law, others will surely step in.
Two women reported to be relatives of assassinated Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani who were arrested...
The annual March of Return, which typically draws tens of thousands of Palestinians inside Israel, was...
A display of 20,000 teddy bears appeared on the National Mall in Washington, DC, on Thursday...
Israeli forces dispersed a student protest in the village of Umm al-Khair on Sunday, after barring...
