The first of several British investigations into the e-mails leaked from one of the world's leading climate research centers has largely vindicated the scientists involved.
The House of Commons' Science and Technology Committee said they had seen no evidence to support charges that the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit or its director, Phil Jones, had tampered with data or perverted the peer review process to exaggerate the threat of global warming — two of the most serious criticisms levied against the climatologist and his colleagues.
In their report released Wednesday, the committee said that, as far as it was able to ascertain, "the scientific reputation of Professor Jones and CRU remains intact," adding that nothing in the more than 1,000 stolen e-mails, or the controversy kicked up by their publication, challenged scientific consensus that "global warming is happening and that it is induced by human activity."
Inquiry: Climate data not manipulated
A mega tsunami in Alaska last year in a fjord visited by cruise ships is a...
The poor and middle pay taxes, the rich pay accountants, the very rich pay lawyers –...
The process of relocating people from New Orleans should start immediately, as the city has reached...
Wildfires burning across the south-eastern US intensified on Wednesday across parts of south-east Georgia, where 50...
