There was no scientific malpractice at the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit, which was at the centre of the "Climategate" affair. This is according to an independent panel chaired by Lord Oxburgh, which was convened to examine the research published by the unit.
It began its review after e-mails from CRU scientists were published online. The panel said it might be helpful if researchers worked more closely with professional statisticians.
This would ensure the best methods were used when analysing the complex and often "messy" data on climate, the report said.
"We cannot help remarking that it is very surprising that research in an area that depends so heavily on statistical methods has not been carried out in close collaboration with professional statisticians," the panel remarked in its conclusions.
'No malpractice' by climate unit
According to a new study, California's historic drought was caused primarily by climate change.Researchers at Stanford...
From the ground in this extreme northern part of Antarctica, spectacularly white and blinding ice seems...
It has been compared to Silent Spring, Rachel Carson’s seminal work that shaped US environmental policy....
