There was no scientific malpractice at the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit, which was at the centre of the "Climategate" affair. This is according to an independent panel chaired by Lord Oxburgh, which was convened to examine the research published by the unit.
It began its review after e-mails from CRU scientists were published online. The panel said it might be helpful if researchers worked more closely with professional statisticians.
This would ensure the best methods were used when analysing the complex and often "messy" data on climate, the report said.
"We cannot help remarking that it is very surprising that research in an area that depends so heavily on statistical methods has not been carried out in close collaboration with professional statisticians," the panel remarked in its conclusions.
'No malpractice' by climate unit
Multi-Chem, a Halliburton-owned business that blends chemicals for oilfield production, including fracking, paid no state environmental...
A class of insecticides called neonicotinoids, which are used on a lot of big corn and...
The longer the world waits to act on climate change, the more costly it will be...
